• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Coccyx - tale of a creationist disinformation post

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
If you're so adamant in believing the Bible is wrong that you have to stoop to ignoring framework narratives and drumming up something about the Bible's chronological layout, then I submit you have a hardened heart.
I got the impression that Ophiolite thinks that you are wrong, not the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,381
10,244
✟293,303.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
If you're so adamant in believing the Bible is wrong that you have to stoop to ignoring framework narratives and drumming up something about the Bible's chronological layout, then I submit you have a hardened heart.
Please note that I have been consistent in my questioning of your interpretation of the Bible. That position will remain hard until you provide sound evidence and a well constructed argument to justify your interpretation.

Perhaps I'll pay more attention to framework narratives when you acknowledge the extensive use in metaphor in the Bible, including Genesis. It might also help if you abandoned this ludicrous attachment to the KJV. It is a literary gem, but not the best basis for a sound Christian theology.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,306
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That position will remain hard until you provide sound evidence and a well constructed argument to justify your interpretation.
I'll pass.

I've cast my pearls.

I think I've given sufficent reasons to believe Genesis 1 and 2 are not contradictory.

And if you want to be a Suskind about it, go ahead; don't let me stop you.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,306
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I got the impression that Ophiolite thinks that you are wrong, not the Bible.
Let's ask him, shall we?

Opholite, are Genesis 1 and 2 contradictory creation accounts?
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Let's ask him, shall we?

Opholite, are Genesis 1 and 2 contradictory creation accounts?
If they were, why would that make the Bible "wrong?" It seems to me it would only make your assumptions about the Bible wrong.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,306
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If they were, why would that make the Bible "wrong?"
I'll take that as a rhetorical question.

You can't be that dense.

For the record, does the Anglican denomination teach verbal plenary inspiration and preservation of the Scriptures?
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I'll take that as a rhetorical question.

You can't be that dense.

For the record, does the Anglican denomination teach verbal plenary inspiration and preservation of the Scriptures?
No, the Anglican Communion is older than those doctrines and in any case, does not teach Sola Scriptura from which they derive.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,306
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, the Anglican Communion is older than those doctrines and in any case, does not teach Sola Scriptura from which they derive.
Okay ... thank you.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,381
10,244
✟293,303.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Let's ask him, shall we?

Opholite, are Genesis 1 and 2 contradictory creation accounts?
They contain contradictory elements. If we view the early chapters (perhaps all) of Genesis as myth and metaphor then those contradictions are unimportant and merely reflect the merging of two marginally different oral traditions. On the other hand if we view those chapters as the literal truth then the contradictions assume major significance and can only be resolved by highly questionable manipulation of the type you practice/support. I repeat I have made no comments on whether the Bible is right or wrong*, merely observed, repeatedly, that I think your interpretation is very definitely and demonstrably wrong.

*The question as to whether the Bible is right or wrong is a meaningless question. It is analogous to asking if the works of Shakespeare are right or wrong, or if the Declaration of Independence is right or wrong, or even more akin to the question asked by son more than thirty years ago, "Daddy, why is yellow?"
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Contradictory or paradoxical?

Or is paradox resolution a forbidden subject in academia?
No, but in this case it does not seem particularly necessary. They are two different stories; two different kinds of stories. No useful purpose is served by trying to force them into being a continuous narrative.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
-_- that doesn't work out quite right because Genesis 1 unambiguously states that birds and other animals were created before Adam, and Genesis 2 unambiguously states that birds and other animals were created after Adam.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,381
10,244
✟293,303.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Contradictory or paradoxical?

Or is paradox resolution a forbidden subject in academia?
If I had meant paradoxical I would have said paradoxical. I follow the principle that one should say what one means and mean what one says; that includes the practice of careful attention to choosing the most apt words throughout.
 
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,306
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If I had meant paradoxical I would have said paradoxical. I follow the principle that one should say what one means and mean what one says; that includes the practice of careful attention to choosing the most apt words throughout.
Well then that explains it.

You think something is contradictory when, in fact, it is paradoxical.

FYI, the Bible has an impressive list of things that are paradoxical.

2 Corinthians 12:10b ... for when I am weak, then am I strong.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,306
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
-_- that doesn't work out quite right because Genesis 1 unambiguously states that birds and other animals were created before Adam, and Genesis 2 unambiguously states that birds and other animals were created after Adam.
And I'll ask again:

How many unambiguous times was Adam placed into the Garden?

Obviously one means "had placed," but it says "placed" because it is rewinding and moving forward again.

I stocked the shelves with buns, then put bread next to them.

In fact, I got to go home early, since I stocked the shelves with bread and buns ahead of time.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
But it doesn't answer the question of why you need Gen 1 & 2 to be one continuous narrative.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,306
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,308.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But it doesn't answer the question of why you need Gen 1 & 2 to be one continuous narrative.
It ... is ... a ... framework ... narrative.

The way a marriage ceremony is conducted today is patterned after Genesis 2.

In fact, Genesis 1 and 2 make up a good set of guidlines to follow.

(Adam has a job, is mature, etc.)
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,381
10,244
✟293,303.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Well then that explains it.

You think something is contradictory when, in fact, it is paradoxical.

FYI, the Bible has an impressive list of things that are paradoxical.

2 Corinthians 12:10b ... for when I am weak, then am I strong.
That quote appears to be paradoxical. The Genesis contrasts are contradictory. If you choose to assert otherwise you need to provide a more detailed and reasoned post than any I have ever seen from you. If it helps I expect you just to change the topic and move on. (I wonder who do you think you are fooling with that technique? It's certainly not me.)
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
No, obviously it says two different things but you can't reconcile that with your beliefs. You shouldn't have to change word meanings to make it make sense, AV, but you do.
 
Upvote 0