YeshuamySalvation said:
Yeshua My Salvation > the origin of the circumcision made by hand comes from men not from God, the circumcision that was given to Abraham came from God not from men.
1 Cor 7:19 19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.
Yeshua My Salvation > from first glance Paul statement seems to be contradictory, first he saids "Circumcision" is nothing, and "uncircumcision" is also nothing, but the keeping of the "commandments of God" which does not exclude circumcision sounds funny, What he means In other words, one does not have an advantage over the other, yet, he says, we must keep the commandments of God. "Which also includes circumcision".
sounds like a cotradiction but it's not, rather there is an allusion to circumcision for the purpose of a sign of conversion having been substituted by baptism, but circumcision remains as a hygienic requirement. Paul is stating that circumcision is not enough, we must circumcise the foreskin of our hearts [Deut.10:16; Deut.30:6; Jere.4:4] by Keeping all of the commandments of God and not just circumcision alone.
Blessings
Greetings YMS,
I agree with the rest of your post

Good Preaching brother.
But...

A few things I'm finding hard to understand.
Either cir' of the Flesh came from G-d or from man. I believe that it came from G-d. I think your splitting hairs there. The
circumstances by which circumcisiom is undertaken can either be of Man or of G-d.
As I see it now (But I am still searching), is that G-d never required Cir' of the Flesh of a Stranger that is over 8 days old. Of the Homeborn, if Cir' is not undertaken at the age of 8 days, then there must be a "remedy of the breach".(Josh 5:2)
This is why Paul states in Gal 5:2 "Behold I Paul say unto you, that if ye be Circumcised*, Messiah shall profit you nothing."
*ie: He is speaking to grown Gentile/Galation men.
If we hold the stance that Cir' of the Flesh is a requirment in order to Keep Pesach, then we are undoing Pauls whole ministry.
He goes on to say Gal 5:4 "In Messiah Yeshua neither Circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but Faith which worketh by Love"
Now we know that Circumcision
does availeth to those who are the Children of G-d. So what is Paul talking about??
I believe he is saying that you Gentiles were "once afar off", but are now made near by "the circumcision that is made without hands". That Old man is now gone. You are a "new creature".
He goes on to say Gal 5:3 "For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole Law."
Once again, we know that everyone that calls himself a Child of G-d is indebted to keep the whole law. So what is Paul stating?
What I feel that Paul is stating is as follows: If you go
back and perform cir', then you must go
back and perform the rest of the commandments! If that means that you've had and affair, then you must be stoned, if you've murdered, you must be stoned etc. In other words you have not attained Salvation by Grace. You are trying to go back and fix up the unfixable.
My argument remains that Torah
first states that Circumcision is perfomed on a Child of
eight days old Ex 17:12.
If we then read anything more than a "
Man child of eight days old" into Ex 12: 45 & 48 then we are
"adding to the words of this book" and, as Paul States we are enforceing upon the New believers a burden that "Neither you, nor our fathers could bare".
My definition of Circumcision of the
Flesh is: Removal of the Forskin of a
Man child of eight days old. And I believe that there can be no other rendering found within Torah.
Sorry, I'm Kinda getting a litte passionate about it all

. LOL.
Ohh and by the way, for you who are wondering, I'm not trying to cover my back, I am the full deal "If ya know wadda mean".
Well, I look forward to your responses. I am kinda tired so it all might read a little "Disjuncted".
G-d Bless,
MattyJames