• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Christ's Nature

eutychus

the phlegmatic one
Feb 7, 2004
615
60
41
Louisville
Visit site
✟31,062.00
Faith
Calvinist
Politics
US-Others
Thinking about this today:

What exactly was the nature of Christ? Man? God?

And if his nature was of both man and God, then how come God could exist witht he totally depraved nature of man. Would that then lead to Jesus' having the nature of redeemed man?

Insight wanted, and much appreciated. :)
 

frost

Active Member
Jun 24, 2003
260
9
Visit site
✟445.00
Faith
Christian
I'll take a stab. I think he had both natures within him. However, his human nature was not "depraved," as ours for he never had the propensity to sin. While he was both God and man, he was somewhat limited as a man. For instance, when asked about the end of the age, he said, "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." I've also heard it said that our sinful nature comes from our father. Since Jesus had no earthly father, he didn't have our sinful nature. I've not studied that a great deal but found it to be an interesting idea.

blessings...
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
eutychus said:
Thinking about this today:

What exactly was the nature of Christ? Man? God?
Christ had a fully human nature and a fully divine nature. His natures were not separated, nor were they intermingled.

And if his nature was of both man and God, then how come God could exist witht he totally depraved nature of man.
His human nature was wrought by immaculate conception, i.e., Mary's pregnacy was the result of divine providence, not the seed of man, through which we are inculcated with a sinful nature.

Would that then lead to Jesus' having the nature of redeemed man?
Jesus was not redeemed because He was neither born with a sinful nature nor did He ever sin.

Insight wanted, and much appreciated. :)
Hope that helps. The duality of Christ's nature is not something that we can fully comprehend because, other than Him, we have nothing to relate it to.

God bless
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
frost said:
While he was both God and man, he was somewhat limited as a man. For instance, when asked about the end of the age, he said, "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."
One little side note on this, there are many examples of revelation in the Gospel that are specific to the human nature of Christ, which was finite. When the Bible speaks of Christ exhibiting human characteristics, such as weeping and, as in the case of the quote above, a lack of knowledge, It is speaking of Christ's human nature. The unity of the Godhead is such that, as they are of the same essence, all three members have the same knowledge and purpose. So, when Christ said "only the Father knows the day" He didn't mean the Father knew something He didn't know in His divine nature. He meant that He did not know it in His human nature. As I mentioned before regarding the distinction between Christ's divine nature and His human nature, not only is there no intermingling of attributes, there is also no transference. Certain traits, like omniscience, omnipotence, eternality, etc., are incommunicable divine attributes.

God bless
 
Upvote 0

frost

Active Member
Jun 24, 2003
260
9
Visit site
✟445.00
Faith
Christian
So you think that even though Christ said he didn't know the day or the hour, he really did? I agree that, "The unity of the Godhead is such that, as they are of the same essence, all three members have the same knowledge and purpose." But that statement relates to an eternal perspective. I believe when Christ was a human being on Earth, in physical time, he did not have all knowledge, nor was he omniscient and omnipotent. Now that he's glorified of course he has those qualities (and had them before the foundation of the world.)

 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
frost said:
So you think that even though Christ said he didn't know the day or the hour, he really did? I agree that, "The unity of the Godhead is such that, as they are of the same essence, all three members have the same knowledge and purpose." But that statement relates to an eternal perspective. I believe when Christ was a human being on Earth, in physical time, he did not have all knowledge, nor was he omniscient and omnipotent. Now that he's glorified of course he has those qualities (and had them before the foundation of the world.)
The Son always had a divine nature, even in the incarnation. I'm not saying that Christ lied. I'm saying that the knowledge of the hour and the day were knowledge that he knew only in His divine nature and, as omniscience is an incommunicable attribute, this knowledge is not transmitted to His human nature. When He said He didn't know the day and the hour He was saying that He didn't know it in His human nature.

God bless
 
Upvote 0

Imblessed

Reformed Baptist with a Quaker heritage
Aug 8, 2004
2,007
111
53
Ohio
✟25,256.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Reformationist said:
The Son always had a divine nature, even in the incarnation. I'm not saying that Christ lied. I'm saying that the knowledge of the hour and the day were knowledge that he knew only in His divine nature and, as omniscience is an incommunicable attribute, this knowledge is not transmitted to His human nature. When He said He didn't know the day and the hour He was saying that He didn't know it in His human nature.

God bless

strangely enough reformationist, I actually understood what you just said and it makes sense!!! :D
The underlined part is what did it for me. Wow, I never thought I'd even come close to understanding how Jesus could be both God and man at the same time and still "not know" things, but I think you actually may have brought me a step or two closer.......:clap: Thanks!


( the problem is, I don't think I'll ever be able to get that understanding across to others.....LOL)
 
Upvote 0

frost

Active Member
Jun 24, 2003
260
9
Visit site
✟445.00
Faith
Christian
Reformationist said:
The Son always had a divine nature, even in the incarnation. I'm not saying that Christ lied. I'm saying that the knowledge of the hour and the day were knowledge that he knew only in His divine nature and, as omniscience is an incommunicable attribute, this knowledge is not transmitted to His human nature. When He said He didn't know the day and the hour He was saying that He didn't know it in His human nature.

God bless
I agree completely Ref, I guess we were saying the same thing in different ways. Even though he was divine, he was also human and thus did have restrictions such as lack of knowing the exact hour and day. Those restrictions, however, did not change who he was. His Father knew, and since he and his Father were one, he, in a sense did know yet at that time he (his human nature,) didn't know the exact day/hour. It really all boils down the explanation of the Trinity which is not an easy one for us to grasp.

blessings...
 
Upvote 0

Fotina

Regular Member
Sep 17, 2004
687
78
✟1,217.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Reformationist said:
The Son always had a divine nature, even in the incarnation. I'm not saying that Christ lied. I'm saying that the knowledge of the hour and the day were knowledge that he knew only in His divine nature and, as omniscience is an incommunicable attribute, this knowledge is not transmitted to His human nature. When He said He didn't know the day and the hour He was saying that He didn't know it in His human nature.

God bless
That sounds dangerously like you are separating the divine from the human in the one person of Christ.

I think the explanation is somewhere in the verse that speaks of Christ "emptying Himself and taking the form of a slave".

peace
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Imblessed said:
strangely enough reformationist, I actually understood what you just said and it makes sense!!! :D
The underlined part is what did it for me. Wow, I never thought I'd even come close to understanding how Jesus could be both God and man at the same time and still "not know" things, but I think you actually may have brought me a step or two closer.......:clap: Thanks!


( the problem is, I don't think I'll ever be able to get that understanding across to others.....LOL)
LOL! If I gave you the impression that I fully understand the concept of the duality of Jesus' nature please forgive me. It is a doctrine, much like the Trinity, that is taught but far beyond our ability to fully comprehend. :)
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
frost said:
I agree completely Ref, I guess we were saying the same thing in different ways. Even though he was divine, he was also human and thus did have restrictions such as lack of knowing the exact hour and day. Those restrictions, however, did not change who he was. His Father knew, and since he and his Father were one, he, in a sense did know yet at that time he (his human nature,) didn't know the exact day/hour. It really all boils down the explanation of the Trinity which is not an easy one for us to grasp.

blessings...
That's exactly right and exactly what I meant. As for the Trinity, well, "not an easy one for us to grasp" is putting it lightly.:) ;)

God bless
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Fotina said:
That sounds dangerously like you are separating the divine from the human in the one person of Christ.
Actually, in my first post in this thread, I said the opposite of that:

Reformationist said:
Christ had a fully human nature and a fully divine nature. His natures were not separated, nor were they intermingled.
God bless
 
Upvote 0

Imblessed

Reformed Baptist with a Quaker heritage
Aug 8, 2004
2,007
111
53
Ohio
✟25,256.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Reformationist said:
LOL! If I gave you the impression that I fully understand the concept of the duality of Jesus' nature please forgive me. It is a doctrine, much like the Trinity, that is taught but far beyond our ability to fully comprehend. :)

Naww, I know you better than that! You just managed to put it in a way that helped me 'understand' it just a wee bit more, that's all.
 
Upvote 0

Reformationist

Non nobis domine sed tuo nomine da gloriam
Mar 7, 2002
14,273
465
52
✟44,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Imblessed said:
Naww, I know you better than that! You just managed to put it in a way that helped me 'understand' it just a wee bit more, that's all.
Well then, that's good. Glad to have helped. :)

God bless
 
Upvote 0

theseed

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
6,026
132
Clarksville, TN
Visit site
✟75,788.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
eutychus said:
Thinking about this today:

What exactly was the nature of Christ? Man? God?

And if his nature was of both man and God, then how come God could exist witht he totally depraved nature of man. Would that then lead to Jesus' having the nature of redeemed man?

Insight wanted, and much appreciated. :)
Chirst is both God and Man, his humanity is came by an act of creation by the Holly Spirit. So he remained untainted by sin. God helped proved this by having him born of a virgin.
 
Upvote 0