The occult is real, but harry potter is cartoonish. Theres no proof people in the occult fly on brooms.
The occult is real, but harry potter is cartoonish.
Harry Potter is like portions of many classic children's stories, King Arthur and Merlin, The Wizard of OZ, etc. all rolled by into one.The occult is real, but harry potter is cartoonish. Theres no proof people in the occult fly on brooms.
A well-read student of the classics would quickly recognize Rowling's influences. Tolkien, Lewis, Dickens, Austen, Trollope, and Greek mythology are prominent elements in her books.
Well, you might contrast Harry Potter with The Lord of the Rings, where the inherent magic of Elves is positive, but sorcery by human beings is not. I don't support a Harry Potter ban, btw, but I think parental supervision is probably required.
Rowling uses a different approach.
and I siriusly mean it
If that's a joke, and not just a spelling error, it's very, very funny.
Well done Raven! 10 points for Slytherin. And some butterbeer for the road.
The argument against Harry Potter (such as it is), is that the "cartoonish" occult in books (if it is described positively) makes people more open to the real occult.