Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
quote:
So in order to defend this position, you have to back yourselves into the corner of lawlessness..
Why do you write that ?
but then you have to consider the idea that if it was written in his heart, why bother to write it out? because we have fallen from our true purpose as much as they did when they took the sabbath from a day of relationship and being with God and turned it into a day of fear of breaking the rules. (But this is again, MHO)The law was written on the hearts of men before it was written on stone. Cain could not be guilty of murder if the law had not existed.
Rom 5:13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
(BBE) Because, till the law came, sin was in existence, but sin is not put to the account of anyone when there is no law to be broken.
Sin was in the world before the written law existed. So why was Cains sin accounted for? The law was written on his heart.
you can keep the commandments and the law and never fulfill them... that's what he did... not end them, but actually fulfill what was intended (without hiding behind fences and protection)Why do some Christians remind others to honor their father and mother, or some of the other commandments. But when the Sabbath is mentioned they say "We are not obligated" do you guys say that out of laziness?
I dont mean to be rude, but thats what it seems like. Of course none of us never always kept the Sabbath, probably never at all. However, that doesn't mean we shouldn't start.
Remember this little verse?
Matthew 5:17-19
"17Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
19Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
There is also this verse:
Revelation 12:16-17
"17And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."
You cannot ignore those scriptures that easily. Yeah, I know, its not that convenient to keep the Sabbath. But I think you guys can survive without turning on an oven for a day.
actually, if you look up the "days" thread in the messianic area you'll see that it's more likely he was raised on Saturday... not Sunday... making the Sabbath the Sabbath, and the Lord's day as well.Here's an excerpt from the article, "The Grace of Christ and the Law of Moses" located in the recently published Orthodox Study Bible, p. 90 (Thomas Nelson, 2008):
The Law was given for a purpose, which has now been fulfilled in Christ. We are no longer bound to the letter of the law, but it was given to make us aware of our disobedience, or difficulty to be obedient to God. We now have the Holy Spirit as an aid to convict us. Keeping the Sabbath was a rule created to show man how hard obedience is for us. Now the Holy Spirit shows us that, so the keeping of the Sabbath is no longer a legalistic rule we must follow. Instead we celebrate the Lord's Day as holy, since it was the day of the week God chose to be raised from the dead. It's a celebration of the victorious Christ who destroyed death for us, so that we could be received into Heaven.
Basil
It was a joke, of course. At least, we assume that the rules were being kept.If you read the post that caused that comment you should understand why
do you not believe what presents itself as "the church" is not corrupted? those who are truely the church even have some members who have not opened their eyes to the truth and most church practices miss the mark on the true purpose of Christ to begin with... so I'd say "church" as a building and organization and group of people is surely corrupt, but the body of Christ as the church, is not.Sorry, I always get a little nervous when people start suggesting the Church has been corrupted.
tulc(it's a pet peeve of mine, I hope I didn't offend you)
but then you have to consider the idea that if it was written in his heart, why bother to write it out? because we have fallen from our true purpose as much as they did when they took the sabbath from a day of relationship and being with God and turned it into a day of fear of breaking the rules. (But this is again, MHO)
If you don't keep them out of love for love is the fulfilling of the lawyou can keep the commandments and the law and never fulfill them...
But does the bible say this? Does the bible divide the law into certain "civil" or "ceremonial" parts? And when was (a certain portion of) the law extended to apply not only to gentiles, even to believers, who are not only supposedly DEAD to the law, but heirs to Abraham, who lived by FAITH?
No, the bible is clear, and Jesus even made a point of it, saying that He came NOT to abolish the law, that in fact not an IOTA of it should pass until it was all fulfilled. To claim that you as a gentile and/or born again believer is under a certain part of the mosaic law is simply indefensible from the bible. IF you are under the law, you are under the ENTIRE law. If you are NOT under the law, you are not under ANY of the law. Like Abraham, who is our spiritual forefather. He wasn't under the law. I don't see exactly why so many of you WANT to be under the law, anyway.
The question is, What does it mean to be under the law? Being under the law does not mean abiding by the law.If you are NOT under the law, you are not under ANY of the law. Like Abraham, who is our spiritual forefather. He wasn't under the law. I don't see exactly why so many of you WANT to be under the law, anyway.
You left out one of the most important verses.
Col 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
Col 2:15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
Col 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of a holy day, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
Col 2:17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.
The handwriting of ordinances being abolished is what led to the statement in verse 16. Thus we need to understand what the handwriting of ordinances are. Simply put it contains the ordinances and sacrifices written by Moses hand. They contains the feast days on which to offer sacrifices which are the sabbath days apart from the 7th day Sabbath contained in the Commandment. They contain eating and drinking regulation during special feast and meat and drink offering for sacrifices. They contain high holy days where the priest would atone for the sins of the people. The handwriting of ordinances is spoken of in Hebrews.
Col 2:17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ
Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshipers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
Heb 10:3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.
Heb 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Heb 10:8 Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law
No actually I don't believe its been corrupted (if by corrupted you mean they don't keep the Sabbath?)do you not believe what presents itself as "the church" is not corrupted?
...and I wouldn't agree with you.those who are truely the church even have some members who have not opened their eyes to the truth and most church practices miss the mark on the true purpose of Christ to begin with... so I'd say "church" as a building and organization and group of people is surely corrupt,
I'm sorry I should have been more clear on that. When I refer to the Church the body of Christ is who I'm talking about.but the body of Christ as the church, is not.
I do?
tulc(do you mean holo?)
I do?
tulc(do you mean holo?)
Is somebody confusing you tulc??
Another cuppa is ALWAYS called for!Maybe another cuppa coffee will help.
I understand it can get confusing on here!PS--I know the message was supposed to go to Holo, wonder why PK doesn't???
Is somebody confusing you tulc??
Maybe another cuppa coffee will help.
PS--I know the message was supposed to go to Holo, wonder why PK doesn't???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?