Hi, Julie. What do you disagree with in post #9? I'm not going to argue with you, I just want to understand where you're coming from...
Upvote
0
Only the giver can repent of a gift. But we are promised God is forever faithful. What of OUR faithfulness? Are we promised that? No.No no no, the verb here is used objectivly to us. The people of God cannot repent of it, it is NOT saying that. Please read the verse and just break down the sentence.
Actually, Outspoken, the passage says, "If ...after having RECEIVED KNOWLEDGE OF THE TRUTH"---please read Heb10:29, 35 (our CONFIDENCE is JESUS---Heb10:19, 6:19-20---do not throw away JESUS!)---do you really think Hebrews' writer supported OSAS? No...EXACTLY BEN!!! If God presents himself before you and you say no, you are left with no sacrifice because you refused God's salvation. Knowledge doesn't save ben, faith does...
You've lost me. Take the three choices above, and apply them to 2Pet2:20-22---which one fits? Do they "again become entangled in the defilements and overcome, worse than BEFORE they were saved", but still go to Heaven? Or is this just a meaningless warning about THAT WHICH CANNOT HAPPEN ("hyperbole")? Or is it a real warning? (You can't argue that "they were NEVER SAVED"---it uses the EXACT SAME WORDS as chapter 2---the ch2 people are described word-for-word as the ch1 SAVED). Which applies? 1, 2, or 3? Did Peter hold to OSAS? No.Wow, you're so bad
You're a bad man , go to your room. There ya go, perfect example.
There is no worry---"Perfect love casts out fear" (1Jn4). BUT---He placed His Spirit IN us, because of BELIEF (Eph1:13); do we have a choice to CONTINUE to believe? We just read 2Tim2:11-13---how about what Jude said in verse 21? "KEEP YOURSELVES in the love of God, waiting anxiousy for the mercy of Jesus TO ETERNAL LIFE!" Did JUDE hold to "OSAS"? No.He placed His Spirit within you to keep you and to preserve you (John 14:16-17; II Cor. 1:22); so you should be REJOICING in Christ, not WORRYING about losing Him!
Yes the struggle is there---but Paul doesn't say "you can never BE saved in the FIRST PLACE---Paul very clearly says, "Keep standing firm and do not RETURN to a yoke of slavery; if you seek to be justified by law, you are SEVERED FROM CHRIST, you are FALLEN FROM GRACE." Ga5:1-4 Doesn't one first need to BELONG, BEFORE he can be SEVERED? Can't only the SAVED, become FALLEN FROM GRACE? You cannot fall from that which you never had...Jesus said to the Jews, if you believe in me, You will have eternal life.
Paul said, if you throw away what I have told you (come under the law) you cannot be saved.
You can either see this struggle, or you can't.
It's there.
Yes we can. If we both ("OSAS" and "OSNAS") agree on the FOUNDATIONS of salvation, IE it being FELLOWSHIP with CHRIST, changed hearts, "BORN AGAIN"---then we can fellowship in PERFECT LOVE AND HARMONY...We can disagree in Christian love.
Exactly---salvation is by belief, by RECEIVING CHRIST. Now please read 2Jn1:7-9: "Many deceivers have gone into the world; ...watch yourselves, that you not lose what you have accomplished, but may receive full reward ('Reward of the INHERITANCE'---Col3:24); anyone who GOES TOO FAR and does not ABIDE in the teaching of Christ, HAS NOT GOD!" Lay aside your anger, your argument, your theory---and simply tell me which number did John intend here? !, 2, or 3? Did John intend that "you can go too far and HAVE NOT GOD, but still be SAVED"? Did John mean "this is MEANINGLESS 'cause you CAN'T go too far"? Or did he mean it as a sincere warning? Or is there a FOURTH possibility, maybe he was talking to UNSAVED? Why then "watch yourselves that you not go too far"? Would that make sense?You will not go to Hell, for you have been saved by believing on the record that God gave of His Son (I John 5:11-13, .).
I read it to be contrasting only TWO views:He means that even when we loose faith, he keeps us, ie OSAS a christian doesn't deny christ, though he does sin.
Ah----you choose "DOOR #2". Are you CERTAIN that you wouldn't rather trade it for the box that Carol Merril is now holding???I choose this, but you have a few things wrong according to context. 1. its only faithless 2. God is the founder of faith, thus its talking in an us way, as in on our own, ie we get trampled working on our own power. Thus when we fail, christ still accepts us and we are still saved.
True---but certain words convey more than mere knowledge. The verse that "piqued" the local Baptist minister, was 2Pet2:20. "EPIGNOSIS"---it's not any ordinary knowledge. It implies, EXPERIENCE. As a Greek expert told me, "Epignosis can NEVER mean mere head-knowledge---it is experiential, SAVED knowledege." And this is what the Baptist minister also saw in the Greek, when he said: "The pain of being an honest man, it DOES say full knowledge..." (He then admonished me to not sew dissention in his flock---which of course was NEVER my intention, but it was an EXCELLENT admonishment---we are to LOVE, not DIVIDE!)As the knowlege issue, faith saves, that we can be sure of biblically, knowledge does not.
Shasbat!* We agree! I didn't think we did...Nope, it is saying 2 very different things. 1. if we disown him, he will disown us I read it to be contrasting only TWO views:
1. we deny christ he denies us..this is no secret, reject the gift and you are rejected
I can't see how "losing faith" and "denying Him" can be two separate things. You seem to be saying, "the FAITHLESS shall enter HEAVEN"---how then does that accomodate, "For by grace through faith are you saved"? As for "EQUATING TERMS", there are MANY descriptions of salvation:2. we loose faith, he remains faithful...here we see how OSAS works, he holds us up even when we fail.
Yes, but keep reading: "And this I pray, that your love may abound still more and more in real knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve the things that are excellent, IN ORDER to be sincere and blameless for the day of Christ..." Sincere and blameless? Isn't this saying exactly the same thing as the verse we just read, Col1:23??? Just after the verse you used to support PREDESTINATION (vs6), Paul prays for us to ABIDE IN SALVATION! (vs9) "That your love abound ...to be sincere and blameless for the day of Christ!"Phl 1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform [it] until the day of Jesus Christ:
"Archegos" means what it means. It means AUTHOR to you (and I say this most respectfully, please always understand my love for you and all my brothers) ...because it needs to, to be in support of "OSAS". ALL of the WARNINGS are changed to "hyperbole" (to support "Predestined-Election"), all references to OUR OWN FAITH somehow get changed to "THE FAITH HE IMPOSED on us!"Actually in this context I would say the definition of "author" is more approprate then leader. He is the beginning and end of it, that's what the verse is saying.
OK, I do not have a doctorate in Greek. But I have talked with those who HAVE---and the opinion is unanimous among them---epignosis of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ can NEVER mean "squatters"---only SHALLOW but UNSAVED knowledge. Besides, there are those two identical considerations, SAME LETTER---separated only by a few paragraphs; the FIRST description (ch1) includes "of the same faith as us"---undeniably as saved as Peter. The SECOND description (ch2), word for word the SAME (except "defilements" replaces "corruption")---but you assign DIFFERENT MEANING? Do you see why I say "your understanding is because you NEED it to support 'OSAS' "? Not meaning to be insulting nor insensitive, what-you-say just seems to me to be "Scripture bending to fit preconception", rather than "conceptions molded to fit Scripture."YOu misunderstand, you can experience God at that point in your life, you are confronted with the choice to accept him or reject him, that's exactly what its talking about, but at no time are you a "christian" during this experience.
"Same exact words, but not the same exact meaning?"
But we cannot infer this whenever we WANT it to mean what WE want it to! Just as in Rom5:18, the two identical "ALL MEN" must be reinterpreted for the SECOND to mean "Oh not ALL but only SOME"! Conception bending for Scripture? Or Scripture bending for preconception?*sigh* I showed you this already with my example of the word bad. A word can mean 2 opposite things.
Help me to understand, how a warning that we KNOW is powerless and worthless, can "keep us on the path"? And if the writer knew that the OTHERS knew the warnings were useless, would they have been written in the first place?but they are warnings ment to keep you on the path, not to say they can be realized.
Originally posted by Job_38
Can Christians lose their salvation? Now that's an important question. Can I be sure that I'm really saved?
Most Christians have probably had moments of doubt about their salvation. After all, we've all entertained thoughts and have committed acts that we knew were displeasing to God. We've all experienced that sense of remorse and sometimes questioned the reality of our salvation afterwards. Backsliding can no doubt cause such feelings to arise, and should hopefully move us to repentance (1 John 1:9).
However, when it comes to the issue of eternal security, the Bible makes it absolutely clear that those who have been saved will never be lost. Jesus emphatically pointed this out in the Gospel of John when, in reference to believers, He said, "I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand..." (John 10:28). In this passage, Christ explicitly declared that no one who has received eternal life will ever lose it.
Furthermore, in such passages as 2 Corinthians 1:22, and Ephesians 1:13, the apostle Paul indicated that the Holy Spirit acts as the very seal of God's ownership of the believer; He serves as the guarantee of our inheritance to come - namely, eternal life (John 5:24; 1 John 5:13). In describing our inheritance the apostle Peter used some very powerful words - words like "imperishable," "undefiled," and "unfading" (1 Pet. 1:5). With these words He underscored the everlasting assurance believers have with respect to God's gift of salvation.
Now I know what you're asking: "What about the Christians who have completely abandoned their faith?" Well, judging by what we're told in Scripture we can only conclude that they were never saved from the start. You see, while "once saved, always saved" is true from God's perspective, man only looks at the outward appearance and thus cannot always accurately assess who is really saved in the first place. The question therefore is not whether someone lost their salvation, but whether they had ever had it at all. As Romans chapter eight says, "there is nothing that can separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord" (v. 28-29). He is the very source of our salvation.
And remember, eternal life that comes to the believer through faith in Christ is not life for two weeks, two months, or even two years; eternal life is everlasting life. It begins at the moment of conversion and stretches on through the eons of time.
THAT'S the one I was looking for to post in the other thread!!!1 Peter 1:5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
"SAVING FAITH", and "SAVING BELIEF" are identical and interchangeable. Please show me a verse, any verse, that says "SAVING FAITH" or "SAVING BELIEF" is imposed by God?Our faith is a gift of God, so I'm guessing he does
The Greek for "EARNEST", is "ARRHABON". What does "arrhabon" mean?22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.