Christian Universalism. What's not to like?

[Hmm]

You said God will get everything He wants, I just proved that He doesn’t.

I don't think we mere mortals can ever prove anything about God. Where were you when He made the universe etc?

 

[Aussie Pete]

What is it about universal redemption that annoys so many Christians? Shouldn’t we be happy that God’s love and mercy are wider, higher, deeper, and broader than we could ever imagine? We all sin at times so shouldn't we welcome the thought that God is not going to annihilate or eternally torment us if we don't “accept,” “trust,” “repent,” “believe,” well enough to appropriate the grace of God?

You would think so but it seems from the recent threads on Christian Universalism that this is not the case. Why is this?

Here are some of the reasons that have been expressed in the threads:

1. ”If everyone is or will be saved, what’s the point in following Jesus?”

To me, anyone who thinks this must see following Jesus as a heavy burden, one that needs the reward of heaven to make it worth the hassle. But shouldn't following Jesus and having a good relationship with him here and now be its own reward?

It's also a misunderstanding of Christian Universalism to think it says that we don't have to receive the saving grace of Christ in order to be reconciled to God and to each other. It just says that if we don't manage to do this in this life there will be boundless opportunities to do so in the next one and that eventually every one will accept forgiveness and repent of their sins... ”that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth" (Phil 2:10)

2. "All my hard work at being a Christian has been undermined".
This is very much like 1. Shouldn't any work we do be done out of love for God, not for any personal eternal rewards?

3. ”If there is an 'us,' there has to be a 'them'"
This may be true about some things such as football: I support Manchester United so I hate Manchester City (I'm from the UK, apologies) but it needn't apply to matters of faith. If we are going to heaven when we die there doesn't have to be a group who go to hell.

These three reasons seem to have something in common and that's judgementalism. They're all essentially saying "Look, I'm a good Christian and my hard work and sacrifices has earned me membership into the very exclusive club of heaven and, sad to say it, but most other people haven't done anywhere nearly as enough as me and so, unfortunately, missed out on the opportunity." This makes you think of the work vs. faith debate ironically but, moving swiftly on from that, isn't it true that being judgemental is wrong and if that's the main reason behind our objection to Christian Universalism, shouldn't we consider that we might be misunderstanding it?

There are biblical arguments that can be made for and against Christian Universalism but there are plenty of existing threads discussing that so, assuming anyone wants to respond!, I'd be more interested in hearing what your gut, visceral reaction is, whether for or against, when you hear the words "Christian Universalism". For me, it's basically relief that God is a loving God and not a monster after all.

The only problem I have with universalism is that it is not true. God has no delight in the death of the wicked and neither do I. I have not always thought this way. I've come to reject universalism after a good deal of study and looking at universalist arguments as objectively as I can. Who would not want to see unsaved parents and loved ones in heaven? The problem is that God is judge and not us.

The more important issue is incentive. It shows the extent of man's fall, but the conviction of sin is essential to get people to repent and receive Christ. Sinners love sin. Watch their hackles rise as they rebel against God's judgement. Lord Jesus said it best, of course. John 3:19

"And this is the verdict: The Light has come into the world, but men loved the darkness rather than the Light because their deeds were evil."

It is the Holy Spirit's job to convict of sin and that through the preaching of the gospel. To tell someone that it's okay, they will be saved anyway, is false. They will brighten up, relax and get on with their sinful and selfish lives. We will have to answer to God for what we do and say in this life.

 

[Hmm]

Another thoughtful post. I have always have to make a really strong cup of tea before I can reply to your posts! I'll have a go...

Yet it also teaches that if people don't, they have another chance after death?
If so, why would they need to?
...
There are also many verses which say that those who don't believe and receive, will perish.
There would be no sense of urgency to preach the Gospel and teach repentance otherwise. Our message would surely be "repent and believe the Good News - but if you don't want to, you will be able to do so when you're dead."

By the same logic, you could ask why is there any sense if urgency to preach to people who are not at the point of death because they can always repent then.

I'm sure we'd both agree that sharing the Good News is important not because people need to reserve a place in heaven but so that they can enjoy a loving relationship with God here and now and help to do His work in this world. Being able to repent on your deathbed or after death does not change that.

Also, repentence is often a difficult and painful thing to do. If you have rejected God and his values throughout this life, wouldn't the sheer amount of delusion and pride mean that it would be even painful in "hell" and who would want to go through that?

There are also many verses which say that those who don't believe and receive, will perish.

Me too - because it's false.
But some people give the impression that God creates people just to send them to hell, and that it is his will to do so.

Is there any real difference, if God sends people to ECT, whether does so because He created them with this express purpose or because they failed to live up to the mark in someway before they died. Whether or not both scenarios are equally abhorrent, are they not both abhorrent?

God has already provided what we need to see him clearly.

Does everyone really get a chance to know God? What about people who go to church to learn about Him and never go back because they are told that God sends unbaptised babies to hell? The first church I ever attended told me this. Rejecting a god like this is not the same thing as rejecting God.

Hell is a state without God - he is not, and cannot be, in hell.

I agree, if there is a realm of existence where God is not present, not to mention one that lasts forever, then God would have failed to achieve His desire to restore all creation. I think where we disagree is that you would think hell can exist independently of God whereas I think nothing can exist outside of Him. I therefore do not believe in an eternal hell.

We ARE only saved through Christ - all those who do not have Christ are not saved.
But I see no evidence that people can die unsaved, without Christ, in their sins, then meet him, repent
and everything will be fine.

Not to repeat the many verses that have been posted in this and the other universalist threads about God being all in all and about Him restoring all people and all of His creation universalist, isn't the Harrowing of Hell not some evidence?

 

[Clare73]

That's true (original sin) for the mainstream western traditions but not for the Eastern Orthodox church which has the more meaningful concept of ancestral sin.

I find the more meaningful concept to be God's declaration negating ancestral sin in Ezekiel 18:20; Jeremiah 31:29-30; Galatians 6:7.

 

[Clare73]

I don't think we mere mortals can ever prove anything about God. Where were you when He made the universe etc?

We can prove what his word written presents, just as Jesus did in Mark 12:23-27; Matthew 12:1-8, Matthew 19:3-6, Matthew 21:12-13,
Matthew 21:15-16, Matthew 9:11-13.

 

[Clare73]

Another thoughtful post. I have always have to make a really strong cup of tea before I can reply to your posts! I'll have a go...
By the same logic, you could ask

why is there any sense if urgency to preach to people who are not at the point of death because they can always repent then.

That's all you got? . .an assumption that we will always know when that is.
You know what ass-u-me means, right? To make an ass(of)u(&)me.

I'm sure we'd both agree that sharing the Good News is important not because people need to reserve a place in heaven but so that they can enjoy a loving relationship with God here and now and help to do His work in this world. Being able to repent on your deathbed or after death does not change that.

Also, repentence is often a difficult and painful thing to do. If you have rejected God and his values throughout this life, wouldn't the sheer amount of delusion and pride mean that it would be even painful in "hell" and who would want to go through that?





Is there any real difference, if God sends people to ECT, whether does so because He created them with this express purpose or because they failed to live up to the mark in someway before they died. Whether or not both scenarios are equally abhorrent, are they not both abhorrent?



Does everyone really get a chance to know God? What about people who go to church to learn about Him and never go back because they are told that God sends unbaptised babies to hell? The first church I ever attended told me this. Rejecting a god like this is not the same thing as rejecting God.



I agree, if there is a realm of existence where God is not present, not to mention one that lasts forever, then God would have failed to achieve His desire to restore all creation. I think where we disagree is that you would think hell can exist independently of God whereas I think nothing can exist outside of Him. I therefore do not believe in an eternal hell.



Not to repeat the many verses that have been posted in this and the other universalist threads about God being all in all and about Him restoring all people and all of His creation universalist, isn't the Harrowing of Hell not some evidence?

 

[BNR32FAN]

Mat 19:26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

That’s a completely different message in a completely different chapter to completely different people about a completely different subject. You can’t just grab verses out of thin air and place them wherever you want. That’s not how rightly dividing the word of God works. If your going to quote verses from other chapters they need to be presenting a somewhat similar context. Your trying to use this verse as if it were possible for Jesus to contradict what He said in Matthew 12:31-32. God cannot lie and He does not contradict Himself.

When did I say any of these things that you attribute to me? Please read more slowly to understand and quote any passage that is not clear. False witness is a sin, in fact it's mentioned in the 10 Commandments.

Right here

The age to come (usually called eternity) is millions and millions of years. Anything can happen.

Right here your saying that the word aeon refers to millions of years instead of actual eternity and your statement “anything can happen” suggests that they can be forgiven, when Jesus specifically stated that they will not be forgiven, they will never be forgiven, they have committed an eternal sin. Luke 12:10 Matthew 12:31 Mark 3:29.

 

[BNR32FAN]

God does get what He wants. He doesn't want to save those who don't believe in Him. "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son. That whosoever believeth in Him shall not perish but have eternal life." Those who believe. Sure God would love it if everyone believed, but they don't, therefore, He does not want those who don't. That is why all who are not written in the Lamb's Book of Life perish in the end.

But He does want all men to be saved and come to the full knowledge of truth and that none should perish. 1 Timothy 2:3-4 and 2 Peter 3:9 specifically state this. I didn’t say He wants to save everyone who will not repent. He wants everyone to repent so that they will be saved but unfortunately everyone will not.

 

[Der Alte]

@Hmm
Christian Universalism. What's not to like? It is unscriptural? I have repeatedly asked for one verse, two or more would be better where the Father, Himself, or Jesus, Himself, states unequivocally that all mankind will be saved, righteous and unrighteous, even after death or words to that effect.
.....Some years ago I was flying from California to the east coast. The man next to me was reading the Bible. He was not in uniform but I started a conversation by saying "You're a military aviator." He looked at me startled and said "Do I have a sign on my forehead or something?" I said "No. you are wearing military issue aviator glasses and have a short military haircut." I told him I had been a helicopter pilot in Viet Nam. Then I said, "I have read that book I like how it ends."
How does it it end? Is all mankind saved, righteous and unrighteous alike, even after death?

Revelation 21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
Revelation 21:5 And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
Revelation 21:6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
Revelation 21:7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.
Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.​

One continuous narrative.
Vs. 4 “there shall be no more death.” After this there should not me any more death.
Vs. 5 “I make all things new.”
Vs. 7 “He that overcomes shall inherit all things.’ This makes a distinction between those who overcome and those who do not overcome.
Although vs. 4 says no more death in vs. 8 eight groups of people are thrown into the lake of fire which is still the second death.

Revelation 21:27 And there shall in no wise enter into it [the new Jerusalem] any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.​

If there is nothing remaining which defiles, works an abomination, makes a lie etc. this verse is unnecessary.

Revelation 22:7 Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.​

According to UR at this time everybody should be keeping the prophecy of this book. This verse assumes the opposite there must be some who are not keeping the prophecy.

Revelation 22:11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.​

Instead of saying that everyone will be saved the angel said “He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still:”

Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Revelation 22:15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.​

This passage distinguishes between those who do the commandments and who have the right to the tree of life and those who don’t do the commandments and don’t have the right to the tree of light.
Five verses from the end of the book there are still dogs, sorcerers, whoremongers, murderers, idolaters, and liars outside the city and there is no mention of salvation after this.
Do you think maybe John got it wrong?

 

[BNR32FAN]

I don't think we mere mortals can ever prove anything about God. Where were you when He made the universe etc?

We can if we believe His word.

 

[zippy2006]

Mind-reading is pretty anti-intellectual too. That's not what I think and I've never said that anywhere.

I didn't read your mind, I read your OP. The fallacy present in your title is merely elaborated in your OP. If you think I am wrong then provide a quote from the OP where a logically valid argument for Universalism is presented.

 

[Andrewn]

That’s a completely different message in a completely different chapter to completely different people about a completely different subject.

What I quoted was the Lord's explanation of "who can be saved?" His answer was that God is powerful enough to save people. Do you think that God can save rich people but cannot save other kinds of people?

When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?” Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.” Matthew 19:23–26

Right here your saying that the word aeon refers to millions of years instead of actual eternity

I said that the age to come is commonly called eternity. In other words:

The age to come = Eternity = infinity = millions and millions of years.

Hopefully, this is clear enough.

 

[Der Alte]

“aionios” occurs 69x in the N.T.
“aionios” is translated world only 2 times in the N.T.
“aionios” is translated “eternal” 42 times in the N.T.
“aionios” is translated “everlasting” 25 times in the N.T.
Jesus used “aionios” twenty eight [28] times. Jesus never uses “aionios” to refer to something ordinary/mundane which was not/could not be “eternal.”
= = = = = = = = = =
In twenty four [24] of the following verses aion and aionios are defined/described as eternal, everlasting, eternity etc, by paralleling or juxtaposition with other adjectives or adjectival phrases.
= = = = = = = = = =
…..Some people argue that “aion/aionios” never means eternity/eternal because they sometimes refer to things which are not eternal.
However, neither word is ever defined/described, by other adjectives or adjectival phrases, as meaning a period of time less than eternal, in the New Testament, as in the following verses.
…..Jesus used “aionios” twenty eight [28] times. He never used “aionios” to refer to anything ordinary or mundane that was not/could not be eternal.
…..In the following ten verses Jesus defines “aionios” as “eternal.”

[1] Luke 1:33
(33) And he shall reign [basileusei, Vb] over the house of Jacob for ever; [aionas] and of his kingdom [basileias, Nn] there shall be no end.[telos]​

In this verse the reign/basileusei, the verb form of the word, is "aionas" and of the kingdom/basileias, the noun form of the same word, "there shall be no end.”
“Aionas” by definition here means eternal.

[2] John 6:58
(58) This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.[aionios]​

In this verse Jesus juxtaposes “aionios life” with “death.” If “live aionios” is only a finite period, a finite period is not opposite “death.” Thus “aionios” by definition here means “eternal.”

[3] John 10:28
(28) I give them eternal [aionios] life, and they shall never [aion] perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.​

In this verse Jesus parallels “aionios” and “aion” with “[not] snatch them out of my hand.” If “aion/aionios” means “age(s), a finite period,” that is not the opposite of “[not] snatch them out of my hand’” “Aionios life” by definition here means “eternal life.”

[4]John 3:15
(15) That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal [aionion] life.
[5] John 3:16
(16) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting [aionion] life.​

In these two verses Jesus parallels “aionion” with “should not perish.” Believers could eventually perish in a finite period, thus by definition “aionion life” here means eternal or everlasting life.

[6]John 5:24
(24) Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting [aionios] life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.​

In this verse Jesus parallels “aionios” with “shall not come into condemnation” and “passed from death unto life.” “Aionios” does not mean “a finite period,” by definition here it means “eternal,” unless Jesus lets His followers come into condemnation and pass into death.

[7]John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting [aionios] life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.​

In this verse Jesus juxtaposed aionios life with “shall not see life.” If aionios means an indefinite age that is not opposite “shall not see life” By definition aionios means eternal.

[8]John 4:14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never [ου μη/ou mé] thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting [aionios] life.​

In this verse Jesus paralleled aionios with “shall [ου μη/ou mé][fn] never thirst.” If aionios means an indefinite age that is not opposite “shall never thirst.” By definition aionios means eternal. See footnote [fn] on “ou mé” below.

[9]John 6:27
(27) Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting [aionios] life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.​

In this verse Jesus juxtaposed “aionios meat” with “meat that perishes” If aionios means an indefinite age that is not opposite “meat that perishes.” By definition aionios means eternal.

[10]John 8:51
(51) Very truly [amen amen] I tell you, whoever obeys my word will never [ou mé eis ton aiona][fn] see death."​

In this verse Jesus juxtaposes “unto aion” with “never see death.” By definition “aion” means eternity.

[Character Limit. Continued next post]

 

[Der Alte]

[Previous post continued]

Paul used the word “aionios” eleven [11] times. In the following 12 verses Paul defines “aionios” as eternal.

[11]Romans 5:21
(21) That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal [aionios] life by Jesus Christ our Lord.​

In this verse Paul juxtaposes “aionios life” with death. “A finite period life” is not opposite death. “Aionios life” by definition here means ‘eternal life.”

[12]Ephesians 3:21
(21) to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever [tou aionios] and ever! [ton aionion] Amen.​

In this verse Paul parallels “tou aionios ton aionion” with “throughout all generations.” "Age(s)" a finite period cannot refer to "all generations." By definition “tou aionios ton aionion” means forever and ever.

[13]Romans 1:20
(20) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal [aidios] power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
[14]Romans 16:26
(26) But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting [aionios] God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith:​

In Rom 1:20 Paul refers to God’s power and Godhead as “aidios.” Scholars agree “aidios” unquestionably means eternal, everlasting, unending etc. In Rom 16:26, Paul, the same writer, in the same writing, Romans, refers to God as “aionios.” Since God’s power and Godhead is aidios/eternal vs. 1:20 then God, Himself is eternal/aionios. Paul has used “aionios” synonymous with “aidios.” In this verse by definition “aionios” means eternal, everlasting.

[15]2 Corinthians 4:17-18
(17) For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal [aionios] weight of glory;
(18) While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal;[proskairos] but the things which are not seen are eternal [aionios]​

In this passage Paul juxtaposes “aionios” with “for a moment,” vs. 4, and “temporal,” vs. 5. “Age(s)” an indeterminate finite period, it is not the opposite of “for a moment”/”temporal/temporary” “eternal” is. “Aionios” by definition here means “eternal.”

[16]2 Corinthians 5:1
(1) For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal [aionios] in the heavens.​

In this verse Paul juxtaposes “aionios house” with “earthly house which is destroyed.” Is God going to replace our destroyed earthly house with a house which only lasts a little longer and will be destroyed at the end of an age? The aionios house is not destroyed, the opposite of “is destroyed.” Thus, “aionios” by definition here means “eternal.”

[17]1 Timothy 6:16
(16) Who only hath immortality, [aphthartos] dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting [aionios]​

In this verse Paul paralleled “aionios” with “immortality.” If “aionios” is only a finite period, God cannot be “immortal” and only exist for a finite period at the same time. Thus “aionios” by definition means “eternal.”

[18]Galatians 6:8
(8) For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; [fthora] but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. [aionios]​

In this verse Paul juxtaposes “aionios” with “corruption.” “Fleshly” people reap “corruption” but spiritual people reap “life aionios,” i.e. “not corruption.” “Age(s), a finite period, is not opposite of “corruption.” Thus “aionios life” by definition here means “eternal/everlasting life.”

[19]Romans 2:7
(7) To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, [apftharsia] he will give eternal [aionios] life.​

In this verse Paul parallels “aionios” with “immortality.” If “aionios” is only a finite period, believers do not seek for “a finite period,” and “immortality” at the same time. But they can seek for “eternal life” and “immortality” at the same time. Thus by definition “aionios life” here means “eternal life.”

[20]1 Timothy 1:17.
(17) Now unto the King eternal, [aion] immortal, [aphthartos] invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever [aion] and ever [aionios]. Amen.​

In this verse Paul parallels “aion” with “immortal.” “Aion” cannot mean “age(s),” a finite period and immortal at the same time. Thus “aion” by definition here means “eternal.”

[21]Romans 5:21
(21) That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal [aionios] life by Jesus Christ our Lord.​

In this verse Paul juxtaposes “aionios life” with “death.” A “finite period life” is not opposite “death.” “Aionios life” by definition here means ‘eternal life.”

[22]Ephesians 3:21
(21) to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever [tou aionios] and ever! [ton aionion] Amen.​

In this verse Paul parallels “tou aionios ton aionion” with “throughout all generations.” "Age(s)" a finite period cannot refer to "all generations." By definition “tou aionios ton aionion” means for ever and ever. The doubling of words for emphasis is a Hebraism see e.g. “king of kings,””Lord of Lord,””Hebrew of Hebrews,””Amen, Amen.”

[23]Hebrews 7:24 but because Jesus lives forever [aion] he has an unchangeable [aparabatos] priesthood.​

In this verse “aion” is paralleled with “unchangeable.” If “aion” means “age,” Jesus cannot continue for only a “finite period” and simultaneously be “unchangeable.” Thus “aion” by definition here means “eternal.”

[24]1 Peter 1:23
(23) For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, [aphthartos] through the living and enduring word of God. …
1 Peter 1:25
(25) but the word of the Lord endures forever.[aion] " And this is the word that was preached to you.​

In verse 23 Peter parallels “word of God” with “imperishable.” The same writer, Peter, in the same writing 1 Peter, verse 25, writes the word of God “endures eis ton aiona/unto the eternity. ” The word of God does not endure only a finite age long but imperishable. Thus by definition “aion” here means “eternity”

[25]1 Peter 5:10
(10) And the God of all grace, who called you to his eternal [aionion] glory in Christ, after you have suffered a little while, [oligon] will himself restore you and make you strong, firm and steadfast.​

In this verse Peter juxtaposed “aionios” with “little while” Jesus does not give His followers a finite period of glory then they eventually die. Thus “aionios” here, by definition, means “eternal.”

[26]Revelation 14:11
(11) And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever:[eis aionas aionon] and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.​

In this verse “aionas aionon torment” is paralleled with “no rest day or night.” If “aionas, aionon” means “a finite period” at some time they would rest, “Aionas, aionon” by definition here means “forever and forever.”
= = = = = = =
Footnotes ου μη/ou mé
●The double negative [ου μη] signifies in nowise, by no means. Θεωρήσῃ[theōrésé], denoting steady, protracted vision, is purposely used, because the promise contemplates the entire course of the believer's life in Christ. It is not, shall not die forever, but shall live eternally.[Vincent word studies]
● ④οὐ marker of reinforced negation, in combination w. μή, οὐ μή has the effect of strengthening the negation (Kühner-G. II 221–23; Schwyzer II 317; Mlt. 187–92 [a thorough treatment of NT usage]; B-D-F §365; RLudwig: D. prophet. Wort 31 ’37, 272–79; JLee, NovT 27, ’85, 18–23; B-D-F §365.—Pla., Hdt. et al. [Kühner-G. loc. cit.]; SIG 1042, 16; POxy 119, 5, 14f; 903, 16; PGM 5, 279; 13, 321; LXX; TestAbr A 8 p. 85, 11 [Stone p. 46]; JosAs 20:3; GrBar 1:7; ApcEsdr 2:7; Just., D. 141, 2). οὐ μή is the most decisive way of negativing something in the future.
Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000)A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian Literature.(3rd Ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
● The combinations with οὐ μή also be noticed as, ουδεν οὐ μή (Lu. 10:19); οὐ μή se σε άνο ουδ ου σε εγκαταιπο (Heb. 13:5); ουκετι οὐ μή (Rev. 18:14). There is no denying the power of this accumulation of negatives. Cf. the English hymn "I'll never, no never, no never forsake."
Grammar Of The Greek New Testament In The Light Of Historical Research
By A. T. Robertson, M.A., D.D., Ll.D., Litt.D. p.1165.

 

[Hmm]

Paul used the word “aionios” eleven [11] times. In the following 12 verses Paul defines “aionios” as eternal.

How did he manage to spread 11 uses of the word over 12 verses?

 

[Der Alte]

How did he manage to spread 11 uses of the word over 12 verses?

I didn't say that did I? I don't know about other folks but I have found it very helpful to actually read something before trying to respond. Read #13 and #14 very carefully.

 

[Hmm]

Yes of course.

 

[Hmm]

I didn't read your mind, I read your OP. The fallacy present in your title is merely elaborated in your OP. If you think I am wrong then provide a quote from the OP where a logically valid argument for Universalism is presented.

The OP's coherent IMO but I'm open to learning if you'd care to tell me where it isn't.

You say you're interested in logic so here's something that's puzzling me and perhaps you could solve it for me. You state that you're a Catholic. Now, the Catholic view is that we should hope for the restoration of all. So how is it logical to believe that and at the same time think that it would be irrational and mere wishful thinking if the restoration of all was actually true? I can't work that one out

 

[zippy2006]

The OP's coherent IMO but I'm open to learning if you'd care to tell me where it isn't.

No you're not. I already did and you ignored it, as usual.

Again, feel free to point to a non-fallacious argument for Universalism in the OP.

Now, the Catholic view is that we should hope for the restoration of all.

No it's not.

 

[Hmm]

No you're not.

No it's not.

These are very persuasive and logical arguments but we need to get back OT.