• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Christian Scientists of the past

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,844
7,867
65
Massachusetts
✟394,673.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The video successfully rebuts the claim that all Christians are and always have been too stupid to be successful scientists. Mind you, I've never heard anyone make that claim, but anything is possible I suppose.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Why are they all so old?
Because more recent eminent scientists who are also Christians are generally not creationists and the producer of the video did not want to bring it up?
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
The video successfully rebuts the claim that all Christians are and always have been too stupid to be successful scientists. Mind you, I've never heard anyone make that claim, but anything is possible I suppose.

My undergrad chemistry T.A. made that claim.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,426
7,164
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟423,819.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Interesting that Galileo was mentioned. His story illustrates what I exceedingly dislike about religion. Which is not personal faith. It's creeds and dogmas of churches, and claims that ancient scriptures are infallible. Science has had issues with infallibility too. But good science is self-correcting. It will admit when it's wrong, and will change long and dearly held doctrines when the evidence demands it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
My undergrad chemistry T.A. made that claim.
My undergraduate chemistry prof was a member of a religious order and no one who knew him doubted his faith in Christ, but he was certainly not a creationist.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
My undergraduate chemistry prof was a member of a religious order and no one who knew him doubted his faith in Christ, but he was certainly not a creationist.

About half of the biology department at the university I attended went to the same Methodist church.

In my experience, other scientists really don't care what religious beliefs other scientists may or may not have. The only time they care is when a scientist's religious beliefs get in the way of their science.

The metadebate conflict that you may be alluding to is the question of how someone can believe something on faith in one area of their life (religion) yet demand evidence in another area of their life (science). I guess we could argue back and forth on how they do it, but it remains a fact that in the majority of cases there is this dichotomy between religious and professional approaches.

It is also true that in any group of people you will have a standard bell curve for things such as tact, civility, and empathy. I don't doubt that there are atheist scientists who think no Christian can be a true scientist. I have met more than a few scientists who sit at greater than one standard deviation from the norm on many different types of scales. Being a scientist doesn't stop you from being flawed, but we wouldn't have it any other way. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
It's a small Roman Catholic liberal arts college in the SF bay area.

Yeah, I assumed RC. "Small" probably means it's a teaching college, i.e. they teach students for the purpose of conferring degrees rather than the larger universities (R1, R2) that focus on research.

Nothing wrong with that. I just wondered. I've tried connecting to a few organizations for research purposes.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Yeah, I assumed RC. "Small" probably means it's a teaching college, i.e. they teach students for the purpose of conferring degrees rather than the larger universities (R1, R2) that focus on research.

Nothing wrong with that. I just wondered. I've tried connecting to a few organizations for research purposes.
You're right, though some of the profs did significant research. When I was there (over half a century ago) the head of the bio department, also a brother, was considered a leading expert on the evolution of bats. He wasn't a creationist, either. :)
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
He wasn't a creationist, either.

Though very open to new and challenging ideas I'm sure.

My financial security took a nasty turn for the worse in 2016. But, in years past I financed an arts program at a university and I was looking to branch out into financing some of my biology interests since I don't have the skills to do it myself.
 
Upvote 0