Placing blame in the wrong area is what you mean.
Of course to make such a claim you would need complete knowledge of all pro life people.
I'm not actually placing blame at all; I am counting for consistency in what they try to maintain is "compassion for the baby" which seems to completely dissipate when the child gets to a certain age.
I think you may need to read what I wrote a little closer. I certainly made no claim that all pro life people are like that.
Why don't we deal with what we do know. Pro Life Christians are the most giving of money, time and resources of all Christians. Here's why.
Statistics to bolster this claim?
1)You think "after care" services extend through the life of a child redleghunter? You have a child for longer than 1 year. Anti-safe abortion providers so frequently forget that babies are around longer than a year and many of those families would need support for much longer than that. So to argue "look how well we are supporting new parents" really doesn't take the place of caring and providing LOVE and ATTACTMENT throughout the whole child's life and equating them is totally disingenuous in my mind.
2) To an extent, your argument here bolsters my point. My argument was about ADOPTION as a viable option for
unwanted babies. YOU are talking about
wanted babies getting more support. And while that's great, for the sake of our talking points that's like comparing mandarin oranges and grapefruits
That should answer the usual red herring comment we get of "you are pro birth and not pro life."
How can it be a red herring if it's true?
I know full well about the existence of numerous christian aid organizations around the world which provide subsistence to the poor.
But, and this is a big but, that, in no way, answers the point.
1) Despite the good work being done, it is insufficient. What aggrevates me is when Christians seem to think"Well, I donated to these organizations, so it is no longer a problem". Your donations only keep the problem from getting bigger. Donating to these organizations is wonderful and please don't stop. But don't be so misguided into thinking that your donations are solving the problem. The problem still exists. Your 100$ donation to the food bank will help out a family of 5 for half a month maybe, but it doesn't take ALL the hunger in your home town away.
2) The argument comes down to equating the raising of a child down to simply fiduciary requirements. That is to say, if you have money, you can raise a child. "I donate money, therefore I am helping unwanted children".
Talk about a missed message.
Unwanted children need to feel wanted. Having parents that don't want them and remind them of that, sometimes verbally, but every day in their neglect and/or ambivalence to their existence, is NOT replaced by making sure those kids had at least one square solid meal a day. If Christian pro-lifers insist on maintaining that label, then I would suggest they start showing love to the unwanted babies that ALREADY exist in the system and give those poor unwanted babies a LIFE full of love.
And that is why I'd rather see more pro-life people adopting. There are several pro-life people in my church who have adopted several kids. I disagree with them vehemently but man oh man do I respect the fact that they LIVE and LOVE that ideal instead of simply holding someone in contempt without trying to use the opportunity to put MORE love in this world.