Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Letting homosexuals adopt children is child abuse. Good thing for this little girl that she's a girl, not a boy, because then that abuse might extend to the homosexuals sodomizing the boy.
Yeah, seriously! You seem to want some lines blurred and seem so tolerant of someone wanting something, but you don't seem to accept the fact that once a line is crossed, then other demands can be made.
So then they want laws changed, even if it makes people in society uncomfortable for the sake of their own comfort.
Homosexual is not the same as child molester. This post is beyond ignorant.
Let me clarify my problem with my understanding of your position: You are suggesting that a medical doctor, without psychological training, be able to evaluate the credentials of a therapist chosen by the parents based upon his subjective criteria, arbitrarily dismiss the diagnosis of the therapist and assign the family to another therapist of his choosing. Then, if the parents don't agree with the doctor, report them so the government can do the same.
All based on a very loose determination of the child being "abused".
And you wonder why I might have a problem with it?
Men can currently go into women's restrooms. As far as I'm aware, that has never been illegal.My third point being: They want everyone else to allow them to do whatever they please, even if it violates the law. So then they want laws changed, even if it makes people in society uncomfortable for the sake of their own comfort. Doesn't changing the law to allow men into women's restrooms sound very much like what I just said? So it's very much relevant, because it is exactly what is being suggested.
But taking a little girl and trying to turn her into a boy is definately child abuse.
The fact that 2 homosexual men would do this to a little girl is not surprising to me. It is one example of the abuse that occurs when homosexuals are recognized as "married" and then are allowed to adopt children.
But taking a little girl and trying to turn her into a boy is definately child abuse. The fact that 2 homosexual men would do this to a little girl is not surprising to me. It is one example of the abuse that occurs when homosexuals are recognized as "married" and then are allowed to adopt children.
I can guarantee you, if two male parents had their young child visit a doctor for a checkup and they insisted the doctor call a girl a boy, red flags would come up and the doctor would be obliged to contact CPS.
Now, an investigation may show the child is not being damaged, but whenever a child is involved in something of his nature, it would raise questions.
Let me get this straight.
You don't think your average primary care physician, when presented with a concern about a child, is not capable of referring the child to a therapist with qualifications to work with and evaluate children?
No evidence whatsoever has been brought to this discussion that would indicate they are forcing anything on the child.
From the OP:
The transgender agenda...
There is no religious right to force your beliefs on the child.
It's pretty disguising when people defend perverts abusing children. So, it's your argument a young child can give consent? Pedophiles around the world want to give you a hug.
There is no right to force your beliefs on the other children in the school or their parents. But the LGBT crowd will insist on doing just that.
No evidence whatsoever has been brought to this discussion that would indicate they are forcing anything on the child.
Are you drawing this conclusion solely on the basis that they are gay, or are you withholding the evidence you are using to decide that?
I remember a case where the parents did the opposite, that you are describing. Then the teen killed her self. Leelah AlcornThere's a famous case where parents tried to force a normal kid to be trans. It never stuck and he eventually killed himself. I can't remember the case unfortunately.
It has more to do with recognizing abnormal and knowing when to investigate, to assure the child is ok.
People who are "mandatory reporters" who are presented with this type of situation and didn't prompt an independent investigation, could and would lose their license, if something bad was to happen to the child.
When a child is examined in a doctors office and they have unusual bruising, there is also no evidence directly pointing to the parents. Even if the child is asked, they will likely initially protect the parents, even if they are being abused, because they likely fear them.
Now, chances are, a mandatory reporter is going to investigate this bruising further, because of the concern it causes them and a need to find out the source. It may be, the child plays rough and got the bruising that way, or it could be, the child is being abused and you can't get to the bottom of it, without further investigation.
Same applies to young child presenting themselves (or parents saying the child should be called as the opposite gender). It would cause some concern and need to be investigated further.
The tricky thing is-who/what defines neglect? I don't know of any law that explicitly states allowing a child being transgender is neglect. Situations like this seem like legal grey areas.
No one is claiming neglect, when there is reason to investigate further. They are simply saying, something is giving them concern and it needs to be investigated. It would be up to the investigation, to determine if there is any type of abuse going on.
There is no right to force your beliefs on the other children in the school or their parents.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?