Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Businesses don't fire people over religious reason. Businesses fire people if they fail t meet their standards. Because businesses care about money, not you the employee. If you aren't benefiting the business you are no longer needed.
edit: does anybody know if Texas an at-will state?
This is not a transgender child. She's gender fluid from what I've read and My daughter who is Gender Fluid switched from playing with dolls to Tonya trucks and I remember her coming to me and asking me why she was a girl around the time she was in 1st grade.
I would research things further than what you have heard before condemning these people for doing anything other than not being you.
Businesses should be allowed to fire you for any reason they chose or you agreed they are allowed to in your contract.I understand but sometimes the business must adhere to no discrimination policy as per federal guidlines.
a business may not feel they are discriminiting, but the governement may sue and win because the out ward appearance is that there is discrimniation.
Dude you don't even know what peer review is and my link refutes averything your links have said.no such thing as gender fluid, or even transvestite.
it is simply confusion.
and peer review indicates this.
now I recommend getting hormone tests done, if the daughter has more estrogen, then she is rightly a daughter, and more testosterone, then she is male.
or a he.
both are provided at conception and the body chooses as per DNA instruction which hormone to supply.
it is the best scientific thing to do with gender confusion.
don't start hacking and chopping off organs simply because of a confusion.
this is why john's hopkins stopped doing the surgery.
I have learned simple rules for quoting sources.
my first tier of reference is someone with a phd in related field.
by second tier is a peer reviewed or referreed journal citation.
my third tier is a peer reviewed from a phd in related field.
ultimately anything other than the third tier has weaknesses as far as being authoritative.
as far as Intelligent design and evolution, that too applies the same way.
I have personally over a dozen referreed journals regarding intelligent design.
there is one called
Evidence Of Design In Bird Feathers And Avian
Respiration
a summary review of this particular journal is found at evolutionnews.org:
Peer-
Reviewed Pro-Intelligent Design Article Endorses Irreducible Complexity - Evolution News & Views
again the same quality of citation I give, I require from others.
if you don't have scientific explainations for your views, then it really is not science.
science relies on observation on a fundamental level.
if you don't have observation it canot be called a hard science, or emprical science.
hard truth, or fact.
the rest that is not hard science or fact relies on non science or faith.
so if you do not have any citations for your view, then I can argue that you simply have faith in your perspective.
sort of like how someone has faith in an unseen God.
(which I would agree to)
You haven't posted anything scientific.very well, I will keep posting my science and you can debate about things that interest you, which obviously is not (science).
Name your sources if you have and put links to them instead of posting that you have.I quoted several authorities, one of which I believe wrote dozens of peer review and was quite influential at johns' hopkins university, the first university to attempt sex reassignment.
I will not do your homework, you will have to search for them.
I posted them at least 2 times, maybe three.
so please do your own homework regarding this matter before again posting assumption.
because unless you have an advanced degree in the area of study, you nor I are an authority, and all else is oppinion.
(as far as your link, I will check it out)
no such thing as gender fluid, or even transvestite.
it is simply confusion.
and peer review indicates this.
now I recommend getting hormone tests done, if the daughter has more estrogen, then she is rightly a daughter, and more testosterone, then she is male.
both are provided at conception and the body chooses as per DNA instruction which hormone to supply.
it is the best scientific thing to do with gender confusion.
don't start hacking and chopping off organs simply because of a confusion.
this is why john's hopkins stopped doing the surgery.
You've just been reported for insulting members here. You can not write well and that is a fact. If you can't accept that after three people have kindly told you then I don't know what to say.yes, it is.
what if I said you were illiterate?
and therefore we should wait for you to learn to read before you go on the major things of science.
would that not be an attack on you character?
it would be an ad hominem attack, on a minor level, but the major issue would in fact not be ad hominem but a straw man.
they are two legs of a bait and switch tactic, I see it nearly every day in one form or another.
when I am doing debates full time.
(note: I am not saying you are illiterate, it was an illustration)
now homosexuals and transvestites try to shock their system by artificially changing these figures. But many times the body will simply correct, sometimes it may take years but eventually it will auto correct. if you just let it do it's thing.
edit: does anybody know if Texas an at-will state?
Yeah, seriously! You seem to want some lines blurred and seem so tolerant of someone wanting something, but you don't seem to accept the fact that once a line is crossed, then other demands can be made. First, people want to say they're the opposite sex. Second, they want everyone else to identify them as the opposite sex. Third, they want everyone else to allow them to do whatever they please, even if it violates the law. So then they want laws changed, even if it makes people in society uncomfortable for the sake of their own comfort.
Businesses don't fire people over religious reason. Businesses fire people if they fail t meet their standards. Because businesses care about money, not you the employee. If you aren't benefiting the business you are no longer needed.
edit: does anybody know if Texas an at-will state?
that is stupid law I think. Businesses shouldn't have to bend over backwards for your conversion. You should just find another job that already accommodates you. Why put that sort of stress on the employer? You agreed to their policies. They have to change them for you? sounds selfish to me.Most states are "at will" and Texas is as well.
In regards to a person's religion getting in the way of doing their job, if the company can not make a "reasonable accommodation" to their religion, the employee can be fired.
A reasonable accommodation would mean, the accommodation does not interfere with critical elements of the job and or business.
For example, there was two muslims that recently won an EEOC claim, because they did not want to deliver alcohol, because it was against their religious beliefs and they were fired. It was found, the company could have made a reasonable accommodation by having other drivers make the deliveries, without it negatively impacting the business.
Now, if this company didn't have a lot of other trucks and or drivers to make the deliveries, the accommodation may not have been reasonable and the firing would have been legit.
Transition and being transgender have nothing to do with homosexuality.
Dr. Paul McHugh is not a good authority on gender dysphoria. Sorry to say, the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association disagree with his assessment on the proper treatment.
John's Hopkins University stopped doing the surgery because of a poorly framed study designed to shut the program down because that's what Dr. McHugh wanted.
For the record, WPATH is staffed by people with degrees as well, so disregarding their documentation is inappropriate.
You haven't given any citations. You've given links to articles. You really aught to learn what you are talking about before you try and post this stuff. It really is annoying.
You haven't posted anything scientific.
Dude you don't even know what peer review is and my link refutes averything your links have said.
Name your sources if you have and put links to them instead of posting that you have.
And this study at Johns Hopkins has been refuted so It Is no longer valid.
Homosexuals don't take cross sex hormones.
Transvestites (or cross dressers) don't take hormones either.
That you list those two in this topic shows a lack of understanding on the issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?