Not really no, mathematicly a fourt dimension is trivial to represent and also used very often in basic engineering, science and so on. For exampel, say that I want to represent temperature in a room in all points, then I need a x, y, z coordinate and also a temperature reading which then becomes the fourth dimension. You can kepp adding data like this to get many dimensions.
Of course not, science deals with many more dimensions than that. Some branches of string theory with as many as 26 dimensions, and the currently popular M-theory with 11 dimensions.
So if science can accept what they can't see as science, why do they automatically rule out God as supernatural?
Gods/magic is by its very nature something that is not possible to adress by science and therefore in the realm of belief.
So a magic show operates outside the realm of science?
Now you are being delibaretely obtuse.
Gods/magic ...
I defend against this blasphemy:
... and I'm being 'delibarately [sic] obtuse'?
As you know what I meant, yes.
... wait...wut?? I thought all things designed/created have a creator... isn't that ID 101?
Ah, so you believe in the something from nothing, school of thought. Your god is sounding more & more less likely.
Not really no, mathematicly a fourt dimension is trivial to represent and also used very often in basic engineering, science and so on. For exampel, say that I want to represent temperature in a room in all points, then I need a x, y, z coordinate and also a temperature reading which then becomes the fourth dimension. You can kepp adding data like this to get many dimensions.
So if science can accept what they can't see as science, why do they automatically rule out God as supernatural?
No person was created.Who is the only Person that can exist without being created?
Who is the only Person that can exist without being created?
No person was created.
Checkmate. Your question failed.
Well, without a more precise definition of what you mean by 'create' it's really hard to say for certain. Does creation include the concept of 'intent'? Does the being doing the creating need to be sentient? If so, then how would you characterize exactly what comprises sentience? Are only humans capable of being 'created'? What about animals? Fish? Bacteria? Viruses? So many edge cases to consider.Let me get this straight.
Are you saying that everyone one of us exists without being created?
So you currently have seven billion answers to my OP?
Of course not, science deals with many more dimensions than that. Some branches of string theory with as many as 26 dimensions, and the currently popular M-theory with 11 dimensions.
While you're certainly correct that popularity does not imply correctness (I can think of a number of examples without working overly hard), that doesn't change the original point. That science is capable of operating with and verifying the existence (or non-existence) of more than three, or even four, dimensions. In fact, I'd suggest that your link actually proves that point.Which means what exactly?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/supersymmetry-fails-test-forcing-physics-seek-new-idea/
Just because something is Popular - the capitol is importantdoesn't mean its correct. Would you agree?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?