I mean the state of their heart is to choose/depend on the world, the guy they will know perfectly well is the beast. It tells god exactly what the state of their heart is...the state that you yourself say is what he is after.
Everyone already depends on their economy as a means of buying and selling to acquire supplies for survival. Taking a chip wouldn't change this any more than changing from furs to paper currency changed this. This does not indicate the state of a person's heart toward God and man, it indicates they need to survive, and care for their families, in a working economy. Jesus did not denounce governments or economies, He stated the opposite. Luke 3:14
You're trying to make this into a state of heart matter by claiming that everyone who would take a microchip in order to survive does so with full knowledge that they are factually betraying God, and choosing a "beast man" over God; but this is nonsense. This means that these people will all be willingly choosing damnation and I'm confident no one willing chooses damnation.
The only scenario that could actually occur is a microchip being required to buy and sell, you and others claiming it is the 'mark of the beast' causing people to wonder if you are right or wrong, without actual knowledge. The ones taking the chip would clearly be of the group that doesn't believe you're correct, and why should they? God isn't providing clear answers in your scenario.
What interpretation does such clear scripture need? It can't be any clearer, and one can only not see it if they choose not to.
It's so clear that there are hundreds of interpretations. And if you are honest, you would confess that you aren't certain that your interpretation is correct. But the fact is that your interpretation is based on a conclusion that is not in the bible, but is a product of your own need to "guess" at what the scripture means, and, hope your guess is the right guess. I know what good teaching is, and I know that God - the greatest of Teachers - would never teach in such a way. Our answers must always come from the bible, and not from our own imaginations.
A few things in the bible are not so clear, this is far from one of them. What part of mark/forehead/right hand is confusing to you?
So is a chip in the left hand acceptable? A chip in the shoulder area? Jesus said, "You must eat My flesh and drink My blood"; do we literally do this? This is a very clear set of words, is it not? But I presume though the words are themselves clearly understood, the understanding of the words is not literal.
In the bible, there tefellin are on the right hand and forehead, which contain the Word of God in them. This is a clear correlation to the mark of the beast, and is no doubt what is being alluded to by John. It is our understanding of the Word of God, and our actions through that understanding that are the sign of the state of our mind toward the Word of God. A man either understands the Word of God literally, and wordly, or he understands them, spiritually. The first is the mind of the beast (without spiritual understanding) and the latter the mind of the Christ.
So what if you are wrong, and people are listening to you, and because of you, take the mark and get everything the Bible claims they will for doing so? Do you not realize the seriousness in this?
I do indeed realize the seriousness of all of this. I mean no offence to you at all, and hope you understand this, but I'm confident that your understanding is, worldly, and erroneous. For many basic and simple reasons that you're not yet taking into account. For instance, the fact that your teaching contains the unstated teaching that God is an incompetant teacher who doesn't properly define His terms to give us sure understanding, but leaves us in the dark to "pin-the-guess-on-the-understanding" and hope we have guessed correctly. We must look inside the bible for understanding, not outside the bible. You are reading the words, then looking outside of the bible and trying to discern what is being said. But this is not how a competent teacher would work. He would either give us sure means to understand, or would not bother recording the words at all.