This reminds me of a kid I knew who grew up in a very closed, rigid and disciplined atmosphere where she was never ever exposed to anything her parents deemed as innappropriate or corrupt...as soon as she went to college, she started smoking crack and dropped out and got pregnant....
You are referring to an inchoate system, a colourless system. That has nothing to do with community chaperones and communities centered around youths.
When I self-correct certain aspects of my life that I intend to change, I supervise how my progression is going. The same can be said for a community and/or a grassroots' community.
Everyone has the potential to contribute to a community. Everyone has the potential to speak up and demand better resources be alloted to a community. Thinking minimally, this happens on a day to day basis with interested individuals dedicated to teaching youths some of their own cultural passions.
I add the fact that youths' interest can be held to pursue a lifestyle of sexual abstinence when given opportunities to broaden their abilities. Again, a Create-It Courtship is one approach to getting such a feat off the ground.
Laugh at it. Scoff at it. I am used to it. There is good in teaching youths to acknowledge one another's accomplishments. To give them space to figure out what type of life partner (if at all) exhibits an essence characterized by know-all empowerment of what does not need to be said or described is a goal we should all back. It is good for youths to contribute to the growing years of other youths to watch them build up their emotional intelligence.
There is a difference between acknowledging and respecting other youths for their contributions and being falsely attracted to them, thereby leading to peer pressure to entice sexual relations. Instead of having possible sexual relations with a youth, or variety of youths, and then later settling for one for a while or so, the art of courtship is taught through the sponsoring (and building up) of community chaperones with Arts projects.
Perhaps some choose to dumb down the concept because of this or that. That has been the case when often some want to change wrongs for rights in a situation. For example how best to manage the geriatric population. Why not give quality homestyle care instead, as certain online journalists have written, fancy but ghetto care? Such employees who have spoken up for residents of long term care and say a need for a resident to be in his/her own room with a sitter/activities person or CNA for parts of the day would be beneficial, but (because such resident is barred from his/her room for safety reasons) the concerned employee is not taken seriously. Such corporates are consistent 9 times out of 10 to keep staffing down.
To also add, there is not one thing wrong with competing with other communities/groups who oppose those who promote abstinence options for
quality resources.
All the arguments in the world can not dump the concepts I propose (CCs, Create-It Courtship, Arts Projects). However, bad teachers can. Promoting an abstinence option, providing quality sex-ed workshops (that cover a broad range of reproductive health material and are directive toward youths respect for how they choose to learn to respect one another) requires the skill and attention of committed community chaperones. Parents and other community members are constantly in and out of the workshops in order to motivate and support. In other words, sex-ed does not have to be dependent on the state. Sex-ed can be taught in the community as well.
Focus on youths first through Arts based programs, where youths market their own programs to their peers and younger members of society, potentially reaching those who are kept from socializing. It is their community to build.
