Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evolution is a demonstrable, observable process. The process of evolution involves the changes to gene pools over time.
-_- you could be referencing two different things with the irradiating flies, and neither of them were evolution experiments.
So you make no differentiation between evolution and adaptation? I suppose if you call everything evolution you can see it where you want. Evolution was to be demonstrated by eradiating fruit flies over many generations. Did it work? No. has evolution, then, been observed? No.
There have been a number of fruit fly experiments trying to force evolution. All have failed.-_- you could be referencing two different things with the irradiating flies, and neither of them were evolution experiments..
Misrepresentation of the experiment used to determine what genes did in this paragraph:There have been a number of fruit fly experiments trying to force evolution. All have failed.
Nothing makes me elite.What makes you elite?.
The fact that you do not consider it to be a myth is just a testament to your determination to ignore how it is viewed by Biblical scholars, linguists, and a bunch of other specialist, many of whom are committed, educated Christians. You also choose to ignore that it's mythical quality does not stop it being true.I don't consider it to be a myth, I consider it to be foundational doctrine. The first three chapters of Genesis are referenced over 200 times in the New Testament alone.
1. The Bible is not a myth.
2. There is a difference between evidence and scientific evidence. I never said the Scriptures were scientific.
3. Natural law is subject to God's authority. The 333 miracles listed in the Bible show that. The miracles God performs in our personal lives also show it.
4. Miracles are violations of natural law. They are not exceptionally rare. This forum is full of people who have experienced things which cannot be explained scientifically.
Can you demonstrate that a single miracle ever happened?In a world subject only to natural law no miracles would ever happen. Even one miracle disproves the notion that we live in a purely physical world.
Once you have personally experienced the supernatural, you understand that those who claim it doesn't exist are the truly uninformed.
The men around Elisha knew that tossing a stick into the water would not make an ax head float, yet the Lord performed a miracle through Elisha. How would you go about validating this miracle? If it can be replicated, then there is a scientific explanation. If not, it's a true miracle.
Or 3) you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Suppose you see two shadows traversing a hallway. There are no people there to make the shadows. The lighting is overhead, so any shadow should be on the floor only, not 3 dimensional and vertical. You're wide away and know what you see. Instinctively, you know they are evil spirits. You can feel their malevolence.
Nobody else is in the room, nobody sees them. How to you validate that scientifically??
Four people are in a house when all four hear footsteps upstairs. They go up to see who is there. They all report the same cold, creepy feeling, but nobody is upstairs. The footsteps stop and later resume when they are all downstairs again. How to you validate that scientifically??
You live in a world of your own construction, where every happening conforms to the laws of physics. The trouble is, you are divorced from reality.
And yet, despite having personal experience with the unexplainable, you still pretend it doesn't exist.
You've been shown the existence of the supernatural and unexplained
I think I will continue to believe God's word over yours.
So you make no differentiation between evolution and adaptation?
I suppose if you call everything evolution you can see it where you want.
Evolution was to be demonstrated by eradiating fruit flies over many generations. Did it work?
has evolution, then, been observed?
Having read some posts here, and been very disappointed by the level of debate, I'd like to challenge the Young Earth Creationists here.
Can you tell us what the roles of population and species are in the modern theory of evolution?
I do this to see if those debating evolution actually understand evolution.
If one jumps from a skyscraper, will one not plummeth to his/her death every single time?
Do you think that there is a possible pathway for someone to jump naked from a skyscraper and land unharmed?
Sorry Dogmahunter, it really makes me chuckle every time you say "plummeth" it sounds like you're going all "King James Version" on us.
(I feel weird bringing up your English skills, as they're probably better than mine, but there's no H on the end mate).
YEC does not care much about evolution. It is a question to wrong audience.
Sorry Dogmahunter, it really makes me chuckle every time you say "plummeth" it sounds like you're going all "King James Version" on us.
I would say that YEC:s dont care much for physical reality.
They do.
Evolution is not a physical reality.
The theory of evolution is a description of how physical reality operates, thats a fact and not debatable.
Theory is not a fact.
A scientific theory explains the facts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?