Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Depends on the bacteria. Most of the old bones they find are from people that were killed at a young age. Often from a spear or arrow head. Young people do not have a lot of bacteria and the bones tend not deteriorate. Often they are doing a routine investigation of a murder only to find out the person was killed man thousands of years ago. This is also true of some of the Monks that purify their body of bacteria. When they die they tend not to deteriorate.
fargonic, the evo-version of the bible creates its own errors.
With Global Warming they are finding bones as the ice melts.
Don't you understand that deposition rates are variable and that sediments can be deposited fairly rapidly by short-lived local disasters such as storms and floods? This does not mean that all sedimentary rocks were deposited rapidly.
There are plenty of sedimentary successions that do not contain fossils, or whose fossils occur only in thin beds covering small areas. Perhaps these rocks were deposited so slowly that their dead organisms were destroyed before they could be fossilised. If you argue that the presence of fossils in a rock requires rapid deposition, I can argue that the absence of fossils requires slow deposition.
Haha that's a little pathetic, but ok. Do what you want mate, when people are going ad hominem it just proves my point.
If evolution has nothing to do with the organization of the fossil record, then people like -57 shouldn't have any trouble explaining its organization, with evidence, as would be on topic here.
Is your claim to atheism based on facts?Once again, I don't lie. I have no need to since the facts support my claims. Also it is against the rules to accuse others of lying here.
I've explained it in a previous post in this thread. I believe I presented 5 methods...and the evos ran. What can I say?
The rate of burial can vary quite a bit. Once again it is apparent that you have no understanding of the idea that you are arguing against.
So you are telling me you can't explain the chemistry? OK. Got it. I'm curious if you read the book you linked to and it was compelling for you....why can't you explain the chemistry?
Is your claim to atheism based on facts?
That is a rarity. For most land fossils we only find single bones at a time. You are listening to lying sources again.Fossils are often found in the "death throse" position. The animals show signs of asphyxiation....head thrown back, hind limbs bent, tail extended. This stronly suggest rapid burial under muddy layers of now-hardened sediment which thwarted bacterial decay and predators. But then again you evos already knew that.
Yes, it is. And your question indicates that atheism is another subject that you do not understand. Let me help you. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in a god or gods. I can assure you that it is a fact that I lack such a belief.
Atheism is a religion.
That is a rarity. For most land fossils we only find single bones at a time. You are listening to lying sources again.
Far more than you do. Why do you make these rather ignorant claims? If you have evidence let's see it. Otherwise we will know that you are sadly ignorant and misinformed.As I said in anearlier post...you don't get out much..do you?
Floods...now you're catching on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?