• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Catholic Teachings.... Backed by Scripture??

Status
Not open for further replies.

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
24,090
14,564
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,484,694.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Have there ever been any Nuns on CF? It appears a lot of them are pretty smart.
Many of the nuns at a convent near Ormylia in Greece are highly educated. Most of the nuns we met had university degrees. At least one was a doctor.
 
Upvote 0

Erose

Newbie
Jul 2, 2010
9,009
1,471
✟75,992.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"Consistent with?"

Is that supposed to mean "not addressed at all in the Bible but allegedly not in direct conflict with it?" ;)

The question then becomes this: Is it correct to invent doctrines using as the justification for doing so the idea that if it's not in the Bible, "anything goes?"

You mean like Sola Scriptura perhaps?
 
Upvote 0

Erose

Newbie
Jul 2, 2010
9,009
1,471
✟75,992.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Assumption of Mary



If Mary was 100 when she was assumed -- then... maybe post Bible.

But as it is - it appears to be without Bible support.

in Christ,

Bob

The Bible does not record everything that occurred during that period, it is a collection of inspired writings not a Summa, nor a catechism; as the many passages that assume the readers already know certain things.

Outside the Gospels, whose accounts end at the Ascention, the only historical book we have is the Book of Acts, which probably did end before the Blessed Mother's death.
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,057
1,804
60
New England
✟622,036.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So why participate in this thread? The OP states that a Catholic was going to defend Catholic doctrines biblically. Seems like a waste of time if the doctrines are not in fact biblical, don't you think?




The Mormons claim the same thing.

^_^

Indeed they do you should listen to them debate one another...

I have this book, and I have a guy...

My guy is better than your guy, my book is better because my guy says it is.

Quite funny!

In Him,

Bill
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,057
1,804
60
New England
✟622,036.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You mean like Sola Scriptura perhaps?

Sure..

But first you must demonstrate you have the correct understanding of the historical Christian doctrine called Sola Scriptura.

If you would like another thread I would be more than happy....

In Him,

Bill
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
BBAS 64 said:
But first you must demonstrate you have the correct understanding of the historical Christian doctrine called Sola Scriptura. l
Why? Pretty much everyone who debates against catholic teachings here quickly demonstrates that they do not understand those.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Assumption of Mary
Originally Posted by ebia
Given that it's a post-biblical event (if it happened) why would you expect it to be in the bible?
If Mary was 100 when she was assumed -- then... maybe post Bible.

But as it is - it appears to be without Bible support.

in Christ,

Bob
Speaking of which, how many Marian doctrines are enough?

http://www.christianforums.com/t7533697/#post56714947
Cardinals Hoping for a 5th Marian Dogma
To Declare Mary as Mother of Humanity

Five cardinals have sent a letter inviting prelates worldwide to join them in petitioning Benedict XVI to declare a fifth Marian dogma they said would "proclaim the full Christian truth about Mary.".....

Brings to mind a strategy used by many today.

Repeat something often enough, even if it is not true, whatever it is believing that if people hear it repeated over and over and over that more and more will believe it and that will make it true.
.
 
Upvote 0

concretecamper

I stand with Candice.
Nov 23, 2013
7,504
2,923
PA
✟343,636.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So why the Catholic preoccupation with making the claim that all of the Catholic church's teachings are biblical? It would seem to me that if you and church think that doctrines can come from outside of scripture then it should not matter if they can be defended with scripture, right?

Would you care to answer the question? The question is: Where in the bible does it say that you must believe what is only in the bible?
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0

concretecamper

I stand with Candice.
Nov 23, 2013
7,504
2,923
PA
✟343,636.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Perhaps then u should start another thread instead of dogging my OP and trying I rabbit trail it into one of yours.

You are the one who start a thread to highlight which Catholic teachings were not in scripture. All I did was ask to prove your premise that "all teachings must come from scripture". and to prove that point, you must show me where it says that is scripture.

I will give you the answer...you can't because scripture does not teach that.

1. Your presupposition is that all teachings must come from scripture.
2. That presupposition is from an authority outside of scripture.
3. That authority may be your pastor or someone in your family.
4. So your entire way of looking at scripture is from a law of man.

And you claim Catholics have man made doctrines....then welcome to the club my friend!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2nuPVTU4Z4&list=PL3w5A_ld90eCY6qIb0a0mu1VXKfZ8kl57&index=36
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

concretecamper

I stand with Candice.
Nov 23, 2013
7,504
2,923
PA
✟343,636.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Originally Posted by SwordoftheLord
Perhaps then u should start another thread instead of dogging my OP and trying I rabbit trail it into one of yours.
You are the one who start a thread to highlight which Catholic teachings were not in scripture. All I did was ask to prove your premise that "all teachings must come from scripture".
and to prove that point, you must show me where it says that is scripture.

I will give you the answer...you can't because scripture does not teach that.

1. Your presupposition is that all teachings must come from scripture.
2. That presupposition is from an authority outside of scripture.
3. That authority may be your pastor or someone in your family.
4. So your entire way of looking at scripture is from a law of man.

And you claim Catholics have man made doctrines....then welcome to the club my friend!
The SDAs ask the same thing concerning the Sabbath.
They ask for one verse from the Bible that shows it was abolished:

http://www.christianforums.com/t7622199/
Where was the Sabbath Abolished?

If the Sabbath was abolished, there would be many verses and much text to show it, yet there is none...........

The Ten Commandments are the only thing that God personally spoke and then personally etched His Law into stone tablets with His own finger. Yet there is not one clear scripture or commandment from Christ or even a direction from a apostle to abolish the Sabbath anywhere in scripture, just a couple of erroneous assumptions.........It was never abolished or changed to Sunday by the authority of God so no such scripture exists..

And they view the RCC in Revelation as the WoB, and the spinoff Protestants as her daughters, because they changed the sabbath to Sunday from Saturday......

http://www.christianforums.com/t4249495-4/
harlot of Babylon and her harlot daughters

Originally Posted by damo73
Does the seventh day adventist church teach that the catholic church is the harlot of Babylon and protestant churches are her harlot daughters and that they the SDA are the one true church.
Here is the thing...

True repentance means turning away from sin. Sin is the transgression of the law.

The Sunday church goers say the commandments don't matter. While they would not condone murder, theft, adultery...somehow the 4th of the 10 commandments is no longer binding.

The change from 7th day Sabbath to Sunday (1st day) as the day of worship has no scriptural authority. The Roman Catholic Church openly admits it. And many reformation pioneers admitted it. They (Catholic church) held it as the proof of that the church traditions are above the Bible. And RCC challenges the protestants who claim to be Sola Scritura to keep the 7th day Sabbath holy. See Rome's challenge: ROME'S CHALLENGE - WHY DO PROTESTANTS KEEP SUNDAY?

How can the protestants claim to be saved by the grace of God yet blatantly ignore one of God's eternal commandments?

The Roman Catholic Church claims to be the Mother Church of all protestant churches and rightfully so. The Council of Trent condemned the protestant reformation on the grounds of protestants contradicting themselves by choosing to keep sunday
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
37,099
5,116
On the bus to Heaven
✟147,402.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Would you care to answer the question? The question is: Where in the bible does it say that you must believe what is only in the bible?

lol No where in the bible does it state that you must believe only what is in the bible. The Mormons believe many things that are not in the bible and so do the JWs. However, the option that you bring to the table is "T"radition but there are many "T"raditions, so which one is co-authoritative with scripture? Yours? EO? OO? Mormons? Others?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.