• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Catholic Faith

Status
Not open for further replies.

geocajun

Priest of the holy smackrament
Dec 25, 2002
25,483
1,689
✟35,477.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Blazen said:
But I thought Baptism was for those who already have faith in Christ, how does a newborn that is born in sin and has no acknowledment of Christ, able to be baptized?
The same way a newborn is able to move around - by their parents who walk for them.
 
Upvote 0

LongingForLight

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2004
794
57
42
✟23,738.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Blazen said:
But I thought Baptism was for those who already have faith in Christ, how does a newborn that is born in sin and has no acknowledment of Christ, able to be baptized?

Turning to the Catechism for this one . . .

1250
Born with a fallen nature and tainted by original sin, children also have need of the new birth in Baptism to be freed from the power of darkness and brought into the realm of the freedom of the children of God, to which all men are called. The sheer gratuitousness of the grace of salvation is particularly manifest in infant Baptism. The church and the parents would deny a child the priceless grace of becoming a child of God were they not to confer Baptism shortly after birth.

Also, part of the Catholic baptism ritual is where the priest asks the parents, "What do you ask of God for this child?" (My wording may not be the official wording - sorry). The parents respond, "Faith". In baptism, we are asking God to grant the gift of faith.

Also from the Catechism:

1231 (last half)
. . . By its very nature infant Baptism requires a post-baptisimal catechumenate. Not only is there a need for instruction after Baptism, but also for the necessarry flowering of baptisimal grace in personal growth. The catechism has its proper place here.

Finally, when the infant grows up, he or she will receive a chance to acknowledge its faith and confirm his or her status as a Catholic in the Sacrament of Confirmation. Baptism is only the first step to joining the Catholic Church.
 
Upvote 0

Blazen

Active Member
Mar 2, 2004
33
0
✟143.00
Faith
Christian
But I though each person is their own and must find faith in Christ on their own.

Acts 8:36-38 Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, "See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?" Then Philip said, "If you believe with all your heart, you may." And he answered and said, "I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God." So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him.
 
Upvote 0

geocajun

Priest of the holy smackrament
Dec 25, 2002
25,483
1,689
✟35,477.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Blazen said:
I do not "desire" to return to the Catholic Church. I do not know which route to follow. But since my path had began towards the Catholic faith, I decided to look for answers through it first in hope of being closer and content with God.
Can I recommend a book for you?
What Catholics Really Believe-Setting the Record Straight: 52 Answers to Common Misconceptions About the Catholic Faith

I am recommneding this book because it seems fitting for the Question and Answer style approach your taking here to learn about the Catholic Church.
 
Upvote 0

geocajun

Priest of the holy smackrament
Dec 25, 2002
25,483
1,689
✟35,477.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Blazen said:
Thank you for your suggestion, but I would still like to learn from you guys.
sure, stick around and keep asking questions, but I highly recommend you also do some research on your own, such as visiting www.catholic.com/library.asp and reading the tracts there.
 
Upvote 0

LongingForLight

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2004
794
57
42
✟23,738.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Blazen said:
I do not "desire" to return to the Catholic Church. I do not know which route to follow. But since my path had began towards the Catholic faith, I decided to look for answers through it first in hope of being closer and content with God.

Yay! That's a good start. After all, if Catholicism is the truth (and I believe it is :)), then it should be able to stand up to any amount of open, honest scrutiny. I'm a big fan of asking questions - I ended up here when I decided to renew my faith by finding answers to the questions that were stumbling blocks for me. Someone here posted on a topic I was interested in, and Google turned up these chat boards.
 
Upvote 0

LongingForLight

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2004
794
57
42
✟23,738.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
geocajun said:
sure, stick around and keep asking questions, but I highly recommend you also do some research on your own, such as visiting www.catholic.com/library.asp and reading the tracts there.

Good advice. Do be careful in your research, though. There are a lot of radical opinions out there. If you run across something weird on the 'Net, you can always come back here and share it for clarification. I found a lot of weird stuff before I ended up here.
 
Upvote 0

ShannonMcCatholic

I swallowed a bug
Feb 2, 2004
15,792
1,447
✟45,743.00
Faith
Catholic
Blazen said:
I do not "desire" to return to the Catholic Church. I do not know which route to follow. But since my path had began towards the Catholic faith, I decided to look for answers through it first in hope of being closer and content with God.

Okay, I understand!! May I also recommend finding a Catholic Church and just going in once a week for an hour and just sit and pray in front of Jesus truly present in the Eucharist. Jesus is there Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity- and if you go seeking answers and go open to whatever path God has in mind for you I know He wil speak to your heart and tell you where He wants you! If you really truly want to know what He wants- it must begin with prayer. But keep asking questions as well! Many people on this board are herebecause they started having their objections to the Catholic Faith answered and it all began to jive- so to speak. Many blessings to you!
 
Upvote 0

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
52
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
Blazen said:
But I though each person is their own and must find faith in Christ on their own.

Acts 8:36-38 Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, "See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?" Then Philip said, "If you believe with all your heart, you may." And he answered and said, "I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God." So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him.
Indeed they do! But look at the Bible for a second: Mark 9:19-24 and Matt. 9 we see instances where the faith of the parents brings healing to the children!!!

Infants are baptized because baptism is the new circumsion (cf. Col. 2:11-12). In Acts we see whole households baptized (this would include children). Peter even said in Acts 2:39, "For the promise is to you and to your children and to all that are far off, every one whom the Lord our God calls to him."

Historically we know that baptism was done since the beginning of the church by the records of the Church Fathers.

http://www.catholic.com/library/Infant_Baptism.asp
http://www.catholic.com/library/Early_Teachings_of_Infant_Baptism.asp

It is the parents' responsibility to raise a child in the faith. That's the same in OT and NT. That is why a parent brings the child into the Church through Baptism. Otherwise, may I ask, does it say in the Bible that your child must wait until a certain age to be baptised? It does not!

The verses that state, "Believe and be baptized" are for adult converts... of course they have to do this. Just as they would have if they were gentiles converting to the Jewish faith they'd need to be circumsized once they converted. But if they had kids, the kids would be circumsized as infants.
 
Upvote 0

Bastoune

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2003
1,283
47
52
New York, NY, USA
✟1,694.00
Faith
Catholic
Blazen said:
I do not "desire" to return to the Catholic Church. I do not know which route to follow. But since my path had began towards the Catholic faith, I decided to look for answers through it first in hope of being closer and content with God.
Always remember: he Bible only exists, thanks to the Catholic Church who preserved her, through whom the Holy Spirit has always worked, and will continue to work until Christ comes again in glory.

Basically, Protestant theologies are all based on personal interpretations on the Bible, which the Catholic Church produced. As Vincent of Lerins stated: “Here, perhaps, someone may ask: ‘If the canon of the scriptures be perfect and in itself more than suffices for everything, why is it necessary that the authority of ecclesiastical interpretation be joined to it?’ Because, quite plainly, sacred Scripture, by reason of its own depth, is not accepted by everyone as having one and the same meaning. . . . Thus, because of so many distortions of such various errors, it is highly necessary that the line of prophetic and apostolic interpretation be directed in accord with the norm of the ecclesiastical and Catholic meaning” (The Notebooks [A.D. 434]).

Realize that none of the original texts of the OT and NT exist. Luckily, the Jews would carefully preserve the texts of the OT, but even between various copies, “variances” occurred. In the first two centuries when the NT was being copied, writing materials were reeds or quills, and sheets of papyrus, which were cut into strips and dried, then laid down vertically (side by side) with a horizontal layer placed on the top and the whole arrangement was gummed together and then “sand-papered” (actually, oyster shells). The sheets were about 10x5”, glued together into strips which could be rolled up. Sadly, these sheets did not last very well.

In AD 300, these sheets were put into a “book” form, that is, simply laid together with a cover to protect them. But these early collections seldom or never contained the whole Bible, since the canon of Scripture for the NT was still being determined. About this time also, the copies were made onto parchment rather than papyrus. (It wouldn’t be until about 800 that a real type of “paper” could be imported from Asia.)

Fewer than 20 papyrus rolls, and 4,000 parchment and paper copies made before the days of printing press, containing parts of the NT still exist. Nearly half of these were lectionaries used for liturgical purposes. All of these have many copyist and editorial mistakes. However, scholars say that only one-tenth of one percent of writing errors (either through copying, or from dictation/stenography) would make any change in the meaning.

The scarcity and incompleteness of manuscripts and stenographic transpositions, made it very hard to “look up” anything in the Bible. Until the 13th Century, the Bible was not even divided into chapters. The archbishop of Canterbury, Stephen Langton, did that for the Latin Vulgate version of the Bible. The division of the Scriptures into verses did not take place until after the invention of printing, and this was first attempted in the 16th century by the Domincan Order.

All copyists and the people who paid them were members of the Catholic Church. All the Popes and early scholarly authorities of the magisterium who determined what books were to be allowed into the Bible were… members of the Catholic Church.

Given the fact that EXCLUSIVELY the Catholic Church compiled, copied, protected, distributed, canonized the contents of the Bible we have today, then we can be sure that the Catholic Church would neither do nor teach anything contrary to them, for it would have been easier for the Church simply to have altered the books of the New Testament to suit her own “evil, corrupt agenda.” But you accept the Bible as the Word of God. Thus, wherever you differ from the Catholic Church, perhaps you will have to admit you really have no certainty that you are understanding and interpreting the Scriptures correctly. If your interpretations do not reflect those of the men who compiled, preserved, and canonized the Bible, I am willing to bet that it is not those Catholic Christians who were misguided, but you who are.

 
  • Like
Reactions: ps139
Upvote 0

Blazen

Active Member
Mar 2, 2004
33
0
✟143.00
Faith
Christian
Okay I'm back. So back to the whole baptizm thing. You must be baptized to be saved, correct? I was baptized so am I saved? Where does it say clearly that you must be baptized to be saved in the scriptures? When read throught the scriptures I clearly thought that salvation was through accepting Jesus Christ, through faith not sacrements or anything like that.

Romans 10:9 If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.

Please help me see this more clearly, thanks.
 
Upvote 0

Michelina

.
Site Supporter
Nov 6, 2003
13,640
663
✟19,733.00
Faith
Catholic
Blazen said:
Okay I'm back. So back to the whole baptizm thing. You must be baptized to be saved, correct? I was baptized so am I saved? Where does it say clearly that you must be baptized to be saved in the scriptures? When read throught the scriptures I clearly thought that salvation was through accepting Jesus Christ, through faith not sacrements or anything like that.

Romans 10:9 If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.

Please help me see this more clearly, thanks.

Ok, Blazen. Jesus told us to Baptise. Obedience to Him is priority #1. Of course, if one who does not believe is baptised, it doesn't "take". Salvation does begin when one believes and when one accepts Jesus as Lord and continues through obedience in all things.

Salvation is a gift from God (Grace) just as Faith is. The most important thing on our side of the ledger is Obedience. "If you love me, keep my commandments."
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.