• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Can't find a church - need to get baptized

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,865
✟344,561.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
But I think Catholics would accept minimalist-pouring (what you're calling sprinkling) as valid still? Even if not best liturgical practice.

From talking to Catholic priests, the water would have to at least touch the skin. Thus (what I call) sprinkling of newborns might be OK, sprinkling of older children (with more hair) would not be. Pouring with a cup or other utensil would always be OK.

AFAIK actual Catholic responses range from accepting Protestant baptisms to doing "conditional rebaptisms," with the formula, "If you have not been baptised, I baptise you..."
 
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,963
20,240
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,740,968.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Well, yeah, if the water doesn't even touch the skin I don't see how you can call that any kind of baptism.

We're supposed to accept each other's baptisms (in water by Trinitarian formula) but you can always find someone who wants to go the extra mile in distancing their extra specially holy group from everyone else. :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,865
✟344,561.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
but you can always find someone who wants to go the extra mile in distancing their extra specially holy group from everyone else. :rolleyes:

I don't think that it's a question of being "especially holy;" it's the fact that different theology leads to different practice.

And the fact that some packages of ideas fit together better than others. For example, baptism by sprinkling a tiny amount of water works if you're baptising really tiny newborns -- which there are several quite different reasons for doing.
 
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,963
20,240
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,740,968.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I don't think that it's a question of being "especially holy;" it's the fact that different theology leads to different practice.

No, I meant even when there are official agreements in place between denominations to accept one another's baptisms, you can always find some member of the clergy who thinks that's not good enough and wants to re-baptise.
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,865
✟344,561.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, I meant even when there are official agreements in place between denominations to accept one another's baptisms, you can always find some member of the clergy who thinks that's not good enough and wants to re-baptise.

Oh, yes, I'm sure that's true.
 
Upvote 0