• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Cannabis is not a sin?

selfinflikted

Under Deck
Jul 13, 2006
11,441
786
46
✟39,014.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat

 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,776
18,699
✟1,484,958.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Chemicals that alter your mood/perception are bad, mmmkay? Even naturally occurring ones.

Serotonin, adrenalin and dopamine clearly need much tighter controls place on them and activities that produce them.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,821
29,491
Pacific Northwest
✟826,378.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Here in the state of Washington we've legalized marijuana. I can, if I so desired, drive downtown to one of the recreational stores and purchase a couple grams or an edible. It is legal to do so for my own recreational use, just as I can go and pick a pack of cigarettes or buy a six pack of beer.

So now the question, of these three things which is likely the most harmful:

1) Tobacco
2) Alcohol
3) Cannabis

If anyone answered 3, cannabis, then you're a silly person. Because if you haven't learned by now how dangerous smoking cigarettes can be then have a date with the Surgeon General. How about alcohol?

Now I do smoke cigarettes, and I'm trying to quit. It's a gross, expensive habit and--I can assure you--that each time I go a day or two without a smoke I feel physically and mentally awful. That's addiction. But no, smoking cigarettes is not sinful. Why isn't it sinful? Because sin isn't doing things that are gross or physically unhealthy (otherwise you should think twice the next time you order pizza or pick up a can of Pepsi).

Smoking cigarettes, dumb? Yes. Sinful? No.

How about drinking alcohol? We have the added problem that alcohol abuse is not just a hazard to one's own body but can--and has many times--led to a hazard for others. Alcoholism is a disease that does not just impact a person's own life but others as well. That said responsible consumption of alcohol isn't a problem and millions upon millions of people are able to sit back with family and friends and consume a couple beers or a couple glasses of wine and it's not a problem.

Is alcohol sinful? Well if you believe that then I don't know how to tell you this, but Jesus didn't just drink wine, Jesus made wine for a party once; and then He used wine and gave it to His followers the night He was betrayed telling them to drink it because it was His blood and Christians have been doing that ever since. You might also need to explain why God commanded the Israelites in Deuteronomy 14:26 to buy food and liquor and celebrate together.

So now we have cannabis. So let's see while ingesting any combustible material (smoke) is bad, cannabis benefits (compared to tobacco) from not being addictive or having a cocktail of chemicals which increase the likelihood of cancer or serious illness. While you shouldn't get behind the wheel of a vehicle while high, you also shouldn't get behind the wheel while intoxicated or even really tired. Sleep deprivation messes with your head.

So cannabis is sinful why? Well if you live a place where it is illegal then you are breaking the law. But, as I said I live in a state where it's legal, so what about where it's legal?

I can't think of anything. If the argument is that it's sinful because it has an effect on the body and the mind, then you need to also claim sugar, caffeine, and whatever it is they put in those gross energy drinks are sinful substances. Also we should make sleep deprivation sinful because going without sleep is quite mind-altering as anyone who has ever suffered from insomnia can let you know. We should also categorize exercise or pleasurable activities whether listening to music, looking at beautiful artwork, or really anything fun or enjoyable because all those things release mind-altering chemicals from the brain.

In Christianity sins aren't things that we decide to moralize about because of arbitrary reasons, that's just legalism and moralism and is, if we take Scripture seriously, its own sin. Sins, instead, are actual things--things we say or do--which violate God's commandments, specifically God's commandment to love Him and love our neighbor. Things like greed and malice, things like hate and pride. Selfishness, gossip, profaning our neighbor's reputation, bearing false witness, murder, holding grudges, etc. Also in the things we fail to do, through inaction, failing to love our neighbor, failing to love God, failing to live righteously in accordance with God's will.

There's real sin, and real sin is a problem.

But there is this nasty little habit that some churches and many Christians find themselves in which instead of actually dealing with real sin and the problem with real sin (greed, malice, selfishness, arrogance, pride, ignoring the plight of the poor and the hungry) simply invent moralistic rules in order to invent a system of moral power either to manipulate others or else create a sense of personal holiness and piety (and the two are rarely mutually exclusive).

And so instead of addressing real, actual personal and social evils we like to invent new ones to rage against instead. It's a lot easier to feel morally superior when we start telling people what they can eat, drink, watch, or wear; it's a little bit harder when we have to confront the reality that we have failed to love our neighbor as we ought, that we have been bad neighbors and friends, that we have said nasty things, done nasty things, and thought nasty things against our fellow man. Because that means we'd have to admit that we, ourselves, are sinners, and that it is we--not the person over there--that must repent, confess, and admit our wrong. We would much rather ignore the harsh realities of justice and what is right and good and our failures to be just and good toward our neighbor; because we are sinners who would much rather point out the splinter in eye of another instead of address the log stuck in our own. We would much rather judge other people then be judged and acknowledge that we are judged.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,776
18,699
✟1,484,958.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Please tell me that I can still eat a steak

Only if your only motivation is to ingest nutrients, are not going to go above your family calorie allotment, have well controlled cholesterol and do not gain even a slightly altered state of consciousness doing so.

Your request to do so is highly suspicious to say the least and warrants investigation if not intervention to assure you are not doing something purely for enjoyment rather then utility.

Expect a knock/the door to fly off its hinges followed by your restraint and treatment shortly.
 
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

Oafman

Try telling that to these bog brained murphys
Dec 19, 2012
7,107
4,063
Malice
✟28,559.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Labour
Nobody expects the Dopamine Inquisition
 
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
speaking of mind altering---anyone like hot chilies???---I use them for pain control also! Sounds contradictory, but the "burn" of the chilies releases the bodies own natural endorphins. It's as close to getting high as I have ever gotten! It has to be very hot, like tearing up hot. Then it settles down and then this "mellowness" hits. My pain recedes and I just feel better. When I have a flare up, my husband will make habeneros and jalapenos --preferably in a bean and cheese burrito. I will be crying from the heat, but not from my pain. I don't understand it, you'd think my pain alone would release the endorphins, but I guess my pain is so constant and high that it takes the extra heat of the chilies to kick in my endorphins--
SSOOOOOOOOO----is there a movement going to start to ban hot chilies and is eating them a sin now???

But just to keep one thing in mind--our bodies are the temple where God resides. Anything that dishonors it, would be wrong---including overeating.
I think we need to make the distinction of medical and non-medical use. We take all sorts of medicines that are harmful to our bodies in order to correct or help live with a problem. I do not intend on spending my life crying and screaming in pain all the time--not sleeping, not being able to think,--the pot gives me a life. To deny someone that right is, to me, a cruel sin.
 
Upvote 0

JustMeSee

Contributor
Feb 9, 2008
7,703
297
In my living room.
✟38,939.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

If you don't believe in organized religion, why in the world are you listening to Mormons?

You should consider what your god may order and local laws.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,789
5,564
46
Oregon
✟1,110,548.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
So, smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol to excess is a sin, (of which I guilty of the former, and I consider it a "sin" on my part and do not try to "justify" it, but acknowledge it as a "sin") Anyways, smoking cigarettes, or drinking alcohol to get drunk ARE SINS, but smoking pot to get "high" is not?
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,821
29,491
Pacific Northwest
✟826,378.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

One can't get drunk off of tobacco. So that point is rather moot.

While I advocate drinking responsibly it might be nice if we at least understand that no matter how much alcohol one has consumed, a little bit is still affects the mind and the body; in fact virtually all substances have some sort of effect.

I am hard pressed to conceive of how one can moralize in a black and white fashion on what is fundamentally a gradient. What does, however, make sense is what seems like a very common sense warning in Scripture against the excesses of alcohol consumption.

Given the nature of the beast, I am hard pressed to see how cannabis is much different. If you can't smoke pot responsibly then don't, if it's causing a problem in your life, then stop. Just like alcohol.

At the end of the day I remain deeply concerned with vain rule-making for the sake of morality control.

Here's an example, as a child I was routinely told about the dangers of things such as Dungeons & Dragons, of certain fantasy television shows (the two big ones I wasn't allowed to watch was He-Man and the Smurfs), and likewise I grew up in an environment that taught that all alcohol consumption was sinful (because Jesus drank grape juice) and likewise there could be little more dangerous than marijuana.

All the messages lots of kids got back in the 80's. "There are witches sacrificing children and cats to Satan in the woods!" etc.

As I got older several things:

1) It was all bullcrud.

2) The moral-religious justifications for many of these things were created completely out of thin air: Dungeons & Dragons could result in demons taking over your life; if you get buzzed on beer demons can get inside of your head. Neat question: According to who? How? What possible biblical or theological justification, in Scripture or otherwise, from which to reach that position?

3) It's all so very, very modern. It may seem to a lot of non-religious folks like it's just carry-over from medieval superstition and the like; but so much of it is just so incredibly new. Even the whole "witch hysteria" better describes not the middle ages but the modern period: For most of the middle ages Christian clergy and theologians regarded the belief in witches as both heretical and superstitious, the author of the Mallus Maleficarum has to spend considerable effort to defend his position on the dangers of witches and witchcraft to a religious audience that for most of history regarded such ideas as nothing more than folk traditions from rural populations to be rejected not encouraged. And witch-hunting was banned in most of Europe, Charlemagne passed laws which made witch-hunting a crime punishable by death; ya know, because murder.

Further, teetotalism is rarely found in the Christian tradition except through the voluntary asceticism of certain monastics. It is otherwise a phenomenon that seems to chiefly have arisen out of post-Protestant pietistic traditions--most notably taking a strong foothold in the Wesleyan tradition which, through the Second Great Awakening which saw the real birth of the American Revivalist tradition was also a steeping of the American religious landscape into certain streams of the Wesleyan tradition which in that period gave birth to the Holiness Movement (from which later arose Pentecostalism), a religious tradition that became profoundly entrenched in the United States, so much so that by 1920 it was actually possible for the Temperance Movement in the US to get the government to sign a constitutional amendment prohibiting the sale and consumption of alcohol for thirteen years.

Religion in America still hasn't recovered from the 19th century, and in a lot of cases through the concerted efforts of certain groups, movements, and persons of clout has continued to do strange things to Christianity up and into the 21st century.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Welcome to the forums!

I think all mind altering drugs should be legal, and available to people of all ages (parents should supervise the dosage for small children). I used to sneak cigarettes and beer before I was of legal age and I could never see the sense to it.

I do have question. If you don't believe the words of Christ or his disciples how can you say that you are a Christian?
 
Upvote 0