Arcangl86
Newbie
- Dec 29, 2013
- 12,143
- 8,377
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Green
I never claimed that they won a majority. I simply pointed out that the largest amount of people have voted for them in all but two elections in this century, which seems to go counter to your claim that they have somehow alienated themselves from the average person by nominating lawyers. You seem to be forgetting that the elections are between three or four people, not two, so winning an outright majority isn't needed to win the popular vote.Arcang: “And it's worth pointing out that in the last 24 years, the Democrats have only lost the popular vote twice.”
Your starting point is a bit arbitrary. If you go back 32 years, Bill Clinton received 43.0% of the popular vote in 1992 and 49.2% of the popular vote in 1996. That doesn’t show a Democratic majority, it shows the opposite.
As I have said before, at least since 1968, and possibly earlier, Republicans or conservatives seem to have a lockhold on electing Presidents. A Democrat can be elected only after enormous failures by Republican administrations, or when the conservative vote splits. See my previous thread on that subject.
The Dominant Party in American Politics
Have the Democrats lost the popular vote more than twice since 2000?
On Presidential elections since 2000, the first one, 2000, is an odd case because we never really finished counting the votes. Wikipedia says that GW Bush would have won anyway but we can never be sure. We do know that the Republicans won in 2004 and in 2024. What about 2016? Hillary Clinton received 48.3% of the popular vote in 2016. The Democratic candidate received more votes than Donald Trump, so it is a tragedy and an injustice that Trump, the Republican was elevated to office. Nevertheless, H. Clinton’s 48.3% of the popular vote is not a majority, it is less than half the vote. So the Democrats have lost the popular vote in at least three Presidential elections since 2000.
http://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_candidates,_2016
It is clear to me that Barack Obama was elected as a majority President in 2008 and 2012 primarily because the Bush Administration entered two wars, Afghanistan and Iraq, and botched both of them.
As for 2000, the margin in Florida was really tight, so there is a possibility that Gore would have won if the recount had been allowed to finish. What's not in doubt is that he won the popular vote, and would have even if every single vote involved in the recount went for Bush.
Yeah, that's not true. Many lawyers work on contingency, and legal aid is a thing. Lawyer rates also can vary pretty widely based on geographic location. It is true that lawyers charge a good amount for their time, but law is also a very specialized skill that requires years of training and is constantly changing. Becoming a practicing attorney and maintaining a practice is a very expensive proposition.The working class cannot afford a lawyer, no matter how badly you need one. That’s the problem with how much money lawyers make.
Upvote
0