• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Can the Democrats Nominate Someone who Isn’t a Lawyer?

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,143
8,377
✟425,083.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Arcang: “And it's worth pointing out that in the last 24 years, the Democrats have only lost the popular vote twice.”

Your starting point is a bit arbitrary. If you go back 32 years, Bill Clinton received 43.0% of the popular vote in 1992 and 49.2% of the popular vote in 1996. That doesn’t show a Democratic majority, it shows the opposite.

As I have said before, at least since 1968, and possibly earlier, Republicans or conservatives seem to have a lockhold on electing Presidents. A Democrat can be elected only after enormous failures by Republican administrations, or when the conservative vote splits. See my previous thread on that subject.

The Dominant Party in American Politics

Have the Democrats lost the popular vote more than twice since 2000?

On Presidential elections since 2000, the first one, 2000, is an odd case because we never really finished counting the votes. Wikipedia says that GW Bush would have won anyway but we can never be sure. We do know that the Republicans won in 2004 and in 2024. What about 2016? Hillary Clinton received 48.3% of the popular vote in 2016. The Democratic candidate received more votes than Donald Trump, so it is a tragedy and an injustice that Trump, the Republican was elevated to office. Nevertheless, H. Clinton’s 48.3% of the popular vote is not a majority, it is less than half the vote. So the Democrats have lost the popular vote in at least three Presidential elections since 2000.

http://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_candidates,_2016

It is clear to me that Barack Obama was elected as a majority President in 2008 and 2012 primarily because the Bush Administration entered two wars, Afghanistan and Iraq, and botched both of them.
I never claimed that they won a majority. I simply pointed out that the largest amount of people have voted for them in all but two elections in this century, which seems to go counter to your claim that they have somehow alienated themselves from the average person by nominating lawyers. You seem to be forgetting that the elections are between three or four people, not two, so winning an outright majority isn't needed to win the popular vote.

As for 2000, the margin in Florida was really tight, so there is a possibility that Gore would have won if the recount had been allowed to finish. What's not in doubt is that he won the popular vote, and would have even if every single vote involved in the recount went for Bush.
The working class cannot afford a lawyer, no matter how badly you need one. That’s the problem with how much money lawyers make.
Yeah, that's not true. Many lawyers work on contingency, and legal aid is a thing. Lawyer rates also can vary pretty widely based on geographic location. It is true that lawyers charge a good amount for their time, but law is also a very specialized skill that requires years of training and is constantly changing. Becoming a practicing attorney and maintaining a practice is a very expensive proposition.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,566
1,388
73
Sebring, FL
✟905,017.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
It's not surprising competent public officials would be lawyers, for several reasons. Being a lawyer requires above average intelligence, since it is a field of largely pure abstraction, and lends itself to familiarity with how laws and legal precedent are made.

FireDragon, you say that law is a field of “pure abstraction.” My experience is that lawyers instinctively argue abstractions that make no sense to anyone who isn’t a lawyer, while ignoring obvious facts. Years ago, I was a juror in a criminal case, a burglary of a boat dealer that happened in the evening, after dark. The lawyers spent hours arguing about the legal definition of a building. The problem that bothered the jurors was something completely different. Since this happened outdoors about 10 PM, by what light did the witnesses, all police officers, see what they saw? Maybe there were floodlights all over the place, and they were on, but that is what the jury needs to know.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,566
1,388
73
Sebring, FL
✟905,017.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I never claimed that they won a majority. I simply pointed out that the largest amount of people have voted for them in all but two elections in this century, which seems to go counter to your claim that they have somehow alienated themselves from the average person by nominating lawyers. You seem to be forgetting that the elections are between three or four people, not two, so winning an outright majority isn't needed to win the popular vote.

As for 2000, the margin in Florida was really tight, so there is a possibility that Gore would have won if the recount had been allowed to finish. What's not in doubt is that he won the popular vote, and would have even if every single vote involved in the recount went for Bush.

Yeah, that's not true. Many lawyers work on contingency, and legal aid is a thing. Lawyer rates also can vary pretty widely based on geographic location. It is true that lawyers charge a good amount for their time, but law is also a very specialized skill that requires years of training and is constantly changing. Becoming a practicing attorney and maintaining a practice is a very expensive proposition.

Arcang: “ Lawyer rates also can vary pretty widely based on geographic location.”

Did you know that state Bar Associations set minimum fee schedules? Bar Associations have the powers of a government agency, so they can fine lawyers who don’t charge enough money.

Arcang: “Becoming a practicing attorney and maintaining a practice is a very expensive proposition.”

Lawyers make a lot of money because they have access to the courts, not because they know what they are doing. Yes, law school costs a lot of money. Why? Because law professors make a lot of money. Why do law professors make a lot of money? Because lawyers make a lot of money. It all goes in a circle.

Arcang: “Many lawyers work on contingency, and legal aid is a thing.”

Contingency only applies to certain situations like accidents and injuries. Legal aid only applies to certain situations. Some lawyers advertise that they give free advice. In my experience free legal advice is worthless.

I’ve never been through a divorce, but everyone tells me that it is maddeningly expensive due to legal fees. A Methodist minister described divorce to me: “You both move into apartments and the lawyer gets the house.”

My experience suggests that lawyers are an immense drag on the economy. Years ago, I was an employee of a small company that started with over three million dollars in capital. They wound up going under and legal fees are certainly one of the reasons. First there is the General Counsel. Among other things, they draw up incorporation papers. Then there are Securities Attorneys. The company sold stock on NASDAQ, which involves huge fees to Securities Attorneys. Then there are Patent Attorneys. When the company ran into trouble, there are Bankruptcy Attorneys. Much of the company’s money went to pay attorneys, and that is without ever being involved in a lawsuit.

 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,784
21,022
Orlando, Florida
✟1,565,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
FireDragon, you say that law is a field of “pure abstraction.” My experience is that lawyers instinctively argue abstractions that make no sense to anyone who isn’t a lawyer, while ignoring obvious facts. Years ago, I was a juror in a criminal case, a burglary of a boat dealer that happened in the evening, after dark. The lawyers spent hours arguing about the legal definition of a building. The problem that bothered the jurors was something completely different. Since this happened outdoors about 10 PM, by what light did the witnesses, all police officers, see what they saw? Maybe there were floodlights all over the place, and they were on, but that is what the jury needs to know.

It's a defense lawyer's job to try to present the best defense for their clients. Indeed, it is their ethical duty to do so.

Lawyers often get a bad rap, but they are frequently misunderstood.
 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,143
8,377
✟425,083.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Arcang: “ Lawyer rates also can vary pretty widely based on geographic location.”

Did you know that state Bar Associations set minimum fee schedules? Bar Associations have the powers of a government agency, so they can fine lawyers who don’t charge enough money.
Uh, that practice has been illegal for 50 years. It's price fixing which is against federal anti trust law.
Arcang: “Becoming a practicing attorney and maintaining a practice is a very expensive proposition.”

Lawyers make a lot of money because they have access to the courts, not because they know what they are doing.
Lawyers have access to the courts because they prove that they process a certain knowledge of the law. And if skill didn't come into it, then all lawyers would make around the same amount of money, but in reality the hourly rates are all over the place.
Yes, law school costs a lot of money. Why? Because law professors make a lot of money.
Honestly, law professors as a whole don't make a ton. It's stable work which is appealing, but most law professors make less per hour then if they were in private practice. The real reason law school is expensive is because there is a high demand for it.
Why do law professors make a lot of money? Because lawyers make a lot of money. It all goes in a circle.
Many lawyers do go into the field because they can make money, but it's simple supply and demand. The same thing is true for other specialized fields with high demand, like medicine.
Arcang: “Many lawyers work on contingency, and legal aid is a thing.”

Contingency only applies to certain situations like accidents and injuries.
Contingency applies only in civil cases, but the majority of work done by lawyers is civil.
Legal aid only applies to certain situations.
Agreed, but you made it seem like it was impossible to get legal aid if you didn't have a lot of money and that's not true.
Some lawyers advertise that they give free advice. In my experience free legal advice is worthless.

I’ve never been through a divorce, but everyone tells me that it is maddeningly expensive due to legal fees. A Methodist minister described divorce to me: “You both move into apartments and the lawyer gets the house.”
A divorce is always going to be expensive because litigation costs money. Even if no lawyers are involved it's still pricy. That's true of all litigation.
My experience suggests that lawyers are an immense drag on the economy. Years ago, I was an employee of a small company that started with over three million dollars in capital. They wound up going under and legal fees are certainly one of the reasons. First there is the General Counsel. Among other things, they draw up incorporation papers.
General counsels have many duties, but just to use your example, the business couldn't exist without being incorporated, which is a very specific process that is different in every state. There are also things like compliance work, contracts, labor issues etc...
Then there are Securities Attorneys. The company sold stock on NASDAQ, which involves huge fees to Securities Attorneys.
Yes, because they have to make sure that securities laws are being followed. Violating them has large consequences for companies.
Then there are Patent Attorneys.
Yes, who navigate patent law and ensure that the IP of the company can be protected and not stolen.
When the company ran into trouble, there are Bankruptcy Attorneys. Much of the company’s money went to pay attorneys, and that is without ever being involved in a lawsuit.
Technically speaking bankruptcy is a lawsuit, but I get what you are saying. But you seem to think lawyers are only important when it comes to litigating in court, but having good lawyers prevents that from even happening, which is to everybody's benefit. Most lawyers don't even litigate, but they prevent litigation from becoming necessary by ensuring that the law is not violated.
 
Upvote 0