Genez said:
In the drawing, men are making certain decisions about matters only God knows to test for. We are not made aware of God's hand in the matter. We may sense something supernatural, but it's never defined at that time of drawing. The Father draws each man *unconsciously*.
The conscious state we finally enter into is what we call faith. That's when we can SEE the one who was drawing us.
Faith can be denied. But at that point men are conscious of what it is they are denying. Not so with the drawing. The drawing reveals who you are. Faith reveals what you are willing to become. It's not of yourself.
You can not stop being who you are. The drawing deals with who you really are. Faith, is God's offering you to become something you are not after you are drawn.
It seems to me that "drawing", is God's calling; and "faith",
is our answer.
...if we answer...
It all depends on which salvation you speak.
You act like there is only one aspect and salvation.
Was it the salvation we all receive when we believe? Our salvation from the Lake of Fire?
It's "black-n-white" to me. There are traits that occur together, never separately:
Unbelief.
Unrepentance (willful sin).
Disobedience.
Rebellion.
Other traits
also occur together, never separately:
Belief.
Repentance.
Justification.
Sanctification.
regeneration.
Obedience.
Godliness.
Maturity (in time).
Thus, when James speaks of a position that is "wandered away from the faith", with the fruits of "uncovered sins", it is the
same position as those who have never believed. For one who walks in sin,
by definition does not believe; else he would walk in Christ rather than in sin.
Or? The post-salvation experience called the Salvation of the soul?
How can "salvation from the Lake of Fire", be different from "salvation of the soul"? Souls are raised in Rev20; those in the First Resurrection, to reign with Jesus; those in the second resurrection, to be cast into Gehenna.
1 Peter 1:8-10 (New International Version)
"Though you have not seen him, you love him; and even though you do not see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and glorious joy, for you are receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls.
Concerning this salvation, the prophets, who spoke of the grace that was to come to you, [note! it was not to them] searched intently and with the greatest care."
The fact that someone believes in Christ? It means the Father was able to draw him to a completion of his drawing him. That completion can not be undone. For? It was done!
Can you support (with Scripture) the idea of "cannot be undone"?
It was the Father's work!
Per John6, it
is the work of God (29), that
WE work (28).
It is HIS work, that WE do.
It can no more be undone, than the work of Christ on the cross can be undone.
Well --- if it's "done by willful belief", why can it not be "undone by willful unbelief"?
What can be lost by the believer is the opportunity that follows belief in Christ. One we are now all given. To grow in grace and truth.. And, with that growth? Glorify Jesus Christ AFTER we are saved.
Tell me something; if someone truly believes (savingly) in Christ,
how can he or she not grow?
Christ is either in someone, as Lord and Master --- thus
the person grows; of He is NOT in someone,
and he/she does not grow. How can it be else? Can Christ be "SORTA in someone"?
...can a woman be PARTLY pregnant?
Gospel means good news.Sorry to say. Your message? Its bad news. It can not be good news.
Good news for those who abide in Christ; the only question,
is "does what I say, reflect Scripture?"
It's up to those who disagree to prove otherwise...
Your message begins salvation by grace. But? Your version of that salvation? Now traps us into a salvation by works. Working for what? For an original salvation which was by grace?
Never "works", Gene; but completely "abiding in Him".
Look at how clear Rom11 is; it is arrogant to think we
cannot fall; we can be cut off for unbelief, and those who fell can be restored if they do not continue in unbelief...
That's like putting up a sign on the counter...
"Free lunch. Only $10.00."
The following passage either says what it does, or it its been written wrong.
John 10:27-29 (New International Version)
"My sheep listen to my voice...
This must be "qualified", by verse 9; if anyone enters through Jesus, he is saved, goes in and out and finds pasture.
This can ONLY mean "becomes His sheep, through belief/receiving Jesus".
I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish...
WHO shall "never perish"? Those who
"believe/enter".
The question remains, "can a person
cease to believe?"
no one can snatch them out of my hand.
"snatch", is "harpazo" --- seize/remove-forcibly.
My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand."
No ONE can FORCE; what does this say against "willful unbelief"? Anything?
Its not a matter of ...
"Well? What about this verse? What about that?"
(when you refuse the explanations to what your exceptions mean, and act like nothing is said).
I'm not "acting like nothing was said"; I showed you how John6, and John10, do not necessarily support what you proposed.
Two persectives, Gene --- you've asserted one of them ("acting like nothing was said").
The other, is if one of us was to perceive a position,
then interpret all other verses into that position. That's why I cited the two passages from James; how can they not speak of "falling from salvation"? 1:14-16, 5:19-20. And identical passages can be found in so many other places....
That passage, Jesus said we will never perish = Lake of Fire.
We,
the SHEEP; but what if
we can cease being "sheep"?
Back to Rom11; God's kindness is for those who CONTINUE in faith, His severity is for those who FALL. We can be cut off if we do not continue in faith, they can be restored if they do not continue in unbelief. How could either of us deny what Paul wrote?
Either that? Or that was not truth Jesus spoke.
It was truth; but we must take the "context", which includes verse 9. And we must read the words as written, including "harpazo-sieze-force".
The fact that some do copy believers' actions, and may appear to be saved? Yet, never was? Does not say they lost their salvation. They can not lose what they never had.
Precisely that; which leads one to puzzle over "wanders away from faith they never had", and "led back to where they never were". How could that be?
These ones are usually religious and legalistic in nature. For these types need rules and regulations; not supernatural guidance, by means of the Holy Spirit.
And even with "rules and regulations", they cannot achieve the righteousness God requires. As Paul said eloquently in Rom8,
"What men could not do, weak as the flesh was, God did...."
John 6:38-40 (New International Version)
"For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.
And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.
And in context, the "given", is clearly "those who belonged to God";
they believed in the Father, thus they were given to Jesus. Jn17:6 is undeniable.
Once again, "given", equals "believe". What if someone
ceases to believe, deceived by worldly philosophies away from Christ? Col2:6-8 says exactly that...
For my Father's will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day."
Jesus said that those who become his, he will never lose. That ALL the Father gives him will be saved. From the Lake of Fire!
Will you consider the possibility that "if someone ceases to believe", he "ceases to be given"?
Jesus will lose none of the
GIVEN; but non-believers
are not "given". The verses that speak of "falling from belief", do not conflict "Jesus loses none the Father gives".
I can just picture your version of how you present Jesus, saying those words.
Picture this...
Those words I just quoted by Jesus Christ? About losing none of all the Father gives him?
What we end up with after your contradictions?
Show me how anything I've said, contradicts Scripture. Tell me how James5:19-20 (and 1:14-16) aren't speaking of "falling from salvation"; and how Heb3:6-14 (and 4:11) isn't "falling from salvation".
Is this kind of Jesus...
Jesus looks up to Heaven and says...
"That sure sounded good Father! I bet you our salvation sales for the month jumps fifty percent!"
Sadly.. That's the kind of Christ you present when you contradict his words. By what you do? That's what becomes of Christ.
You tell us that Jesus can fail to do the will of the Father. The following verse says that by what you tell us, that Jesus fails to do the Father's will.
No one comes to faith,
but by voluntary choice. Throughout Scripture we're warned to "abide in Him"; look at 1Jn2:26-28 --- if we do NOT abide in Him,
they we will shrink in shame at His return. Does that reflect a "saved position"? Can't.
John 6:38-40 (New International Version)
"For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.
And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.
For my Father's will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day."
In Christ, GeneZ
If "belief" is "given", and if "repentance" is "belief",
then what of those in Rev2?
"You have left your first-love; REPENT and do the deeds you did at FIRST, or I will remove your lampstand..."
What do you think he meant when he wrote that?