Revelation 16 speaks of the seven bowls of wraths and broadly describes the effect of each bowl poured out. Giving it a cursory reading makes it easy to imagine the horrible things described, such as people receiving sores, the sea turning to blood and the kingdom being thrown into darkness, but can these things really be literal?
Take for example, the sea and the rivers and the springs all turning to blood. If this were to literally happen, where would people get water to drink? And assuming there is no water to be found, how long will humanity survive after this plague is poured out? Long enough to survive the next three plagues?
Speaking of the next three plagues, the sixth bowl in particular is said to dry up the water in the river Euphrates so that armies from the east can cross, but when the fourth bowl was poured out all rivers were turned to blood. So assuming that these bowls are poured out in order, there shouldn't be any water in the river to dry at all, since it was all turned to blood. Why does it say water?
Furthermore, knowing that it can take several months to organize armies for battle, it seems unlikely that humanity could survive these months having only blood to drink.
Point being, I'd love to hear what everyone's thoughts are on this entire chapter and the pouring out of the bowls of wrath. If you believe them to be symbolic, have you given it enough study to share your thoughts on the symbolism? And if you believe these descriptions to be literal, can you explain the blood thing to me please, as well as the conundrum of the water drying up from a river of blood.
Revelation 16 speaks of the seven bowls of wraths and broadly describes the effect of each bowl poured out. Giving it a cursory reading makes it easy to imagine the horrible things described, such as people receiving sores, the sea turning to blood and the kingdom being thrown into darkness, but can these things really be literal?
Take for example, the sea and the rivers and the springs all turning to blood. If this were to literally happen, where would people get water to drink? And assuming there is no water to be found, how long will humanity survive after this plague is poured out? Long enough to survive the next three plagues?
Speaking of the next three plagues, the sixth bowl in particular is said to dry up the water in the river Euphrates so that armies from the east can cross, but when the fourth bowl was poured out all rivers were turned to blood. So assuming that these bowls are poured out in order, there shouldn't be any water in the river to dry at all, since it was all turned to blood. Why does it say water?
Furthermore, knowing that it can take several months to organize armies for battle, it seems unlikely that humanity could survive these months having only blood to drink.
Point being, I'd love to hear what everyone's thoughts are on this entire chapter and the pouring out of the bowls of wrath. If you believe them to be symbolic, have you given it enough study to share your thoughts on the symbolism? And if you believe these descriptions to be literal, can you explain the blood thing to me please, as well as the conundrum of the water drying up from a river of blood.
Here’s something from the expositors Bible that might help explain some of your questions:
REVELATION 16
NOTHING can more clearly prove that the Revelation of St John is not written upon chronological principles than the scenes to which we are introduced in the fifteenth and sixteenth chapters of the book. We have already been taken to the end. We have seen in chap. 14 the Son of man upon the throne of judgment, the harvest of the righteous, and the vintage of the wicked. Yet we are now met by another series of visions setting before us judgments that must take place before the final issue. This is not chronology; it is apocalyptic vision, which again and again turns round the kaleidoscope of the future, and delights to behold under different aspects the same great principles of the Almighty s government, leading always to the same glorious results.
One other preliminary observation may be made. The third series of judgments does not really begin till we reach chap. 16. Chap. 15 is introductory, and we are thus reminded that the series of the Trumpets had a similar introduction in Rev 8:1-6. It is the manner of St. John, who thus in his Gospel introduces his account of our Lord’s conversation with Nicodemus in chap. iii. by the last three verses of chap. 2, which ought to be connected with the third chapter; and who also introduces his narrative regarding the woman of Samaria by the first three verses of chap. 4.
To introduce chap. 16 is the object of chap. 15.
"And I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvellous, angels having seven plagues, which are the last, for in them is finished the wrath of God (Rev 15:1)."
The plagues about to be spoken of are "the last," and in them the final judgments of God upon evil are contained. What they are, and who are the special objects of them, will afterwards appear. Meanwhile, another vision is presented to our view:
And I saw as it were a glassy sea mingled with fire; and them that come victorious out of the beast, and out of his image, and out of the number of his name, standing upon the glassy sea, having harps of God. And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvelous are Thy works, O Lord God the Almighty; righteous and true are Thy ways, Thou King of the nations. Who shall not fear, O Lord, and glorify Thy name? for Thou only art holy: for all the nations shall come and worship before Thee; for Thy righteous acts have been made manifest (Rev 15:2-4)."
It can hardly be doubted that the glassy sea spoken of in these words is the same as that already met with at Rev 4:6. Yet again, as in the case of the hundred and forty and four thousand of Rev 14:1, the definite article is wanting; and, in all probability, for the same reason. The aspect in which the object is viewed, though not the object itself, is different. The glassy sea is here mingled with fire, a point of which no mention was made in chap. 4. The difference may be explained if we remember that the "fire" spoken of can only be that of the judgments by which the Almighty vindicates His cause, or of the trials by which He purifies His people. As these, therefore, now stand upon the sea, delivered from every adversary, we are reminded of the troubles which by Divine grace they have been enabled to surmount. It was otherwise in chap. 4. No persons were there connected with the sea, and it stretched away, clear as crystal, before Him all whose dealings with His people are "right." The sea itself is in both cases the same, but in the latter it is beheld from the Divine point of view, in the former from the human.
The vision as a whole takes us back to the exodus of Israel from Egypt, and hence the mention ofthe song of Moses, the servant of God.The enemies of the Church have their type in Pharaoh and his host as they pursue Israel across the sands which had been laid bare for the passage of the chosen people; the waters, driven back for a time, return to their ancient bed; the hostile force, with its chariots and its chosen captains, "goes down into the depths like a stone;" and Israel raises its song of victory, "I will sing unto the Lord, for He hath triumphed gloriously, the horse and his rider hath He thrown into the sea."*(*Exo 15:1)
C