- Mar 16, 2019
- 7,400
- 1,329
- 48
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
The same pill that is supposed to prevent the formation of a zygote does this?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not always, sometimes zygotes are formed and the hormonal birth control causes changes in the lining of the uterus, and thus acts as an abortifacient.
Correct, because it doesn't stop the formation of a zygote 100% of the time.The same pill that is supposed to prevent the formation of a zygote does this?
Correct, because it doesn't stop the formation of a zygote 100% of the time.
According to a recent report, 26% of pregnancies end by miscarriage. Most of these occur early in gestation, before the woman knows she's pregnant. But 10% of women with recognized pregnancies also miscarry. There are about 3.5+ million live births in the US annually. It's hard to know with certainty, but it's likely there'd be several hundred thousand more live births if miscarriage wasn't as common.Miscarriages are natural (although they don't happen everytime anyway), artificial birth control pills are not.
We live in a fallen creation and human will (interference) is also a factor on this earth. Yes, God is sovereign, and we may never know the true extent of his will and why he allows certain things to happen until the scriptures are fulfilled (the new heaven and earth are established after the old earth passes away).This raises an interesting question. It's true that most miscarriages are due to natural physiologic factors. (Usually chromosomal abnormalities.) But isn't God sovereign over nature? And is it not an article of faith that God has a plan for everyone's life? The obvious question is why would God's plan allow so many of the unborn to die? It's very possible that embryonic deaths from miscarriage exceed those from induced abortion.
these words could some day haunt you but,What is the name of it? I want to do some research on the efficacy of various contraception methods because added together, it obviously is not 99%.
Do you truly Grasp Who, GOD Almighty is?God told Joshua to kill everyone in Jericho.
In my experience, the claim "God works in mysterious ways" just means it doesn't really make sense, but believe anyway.Do you truly Grasp Who, GOD Almighty is?
He's the Absolute Sovereign of Creation,
"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
If very early miscarriages are included live births are outnumber by miscarriages in some estimates.Where are the statistics on percentage of miscarriages vs. Abortion in the U.S.?
It's more like 70%. The number of abortions is minuscule compared to the number of miscarriages. Live birth is the exception, not the rule. So if one was truly concerned about the unborn, they'd be donating massive amounts of money towards efforts to prevent miscarriages. The fact that such monies are not being donated, and efforts not being made, might cause one to suspect that the lives of the unborn are not as much of a priority as advertised.According to a recent report, 26% of pregnancies end by miscarriage. (...) The obvious question is why would God's plan allow so many of the unborn to die? It's very possible that embryonic deaths from miscarriage exceed those from induced abortion.
You are correct. It’s always seemed to me that much of religious conservatives’ antipathy to abortion is driven by what I call the “Eve” mindset. Which is the misogynistic notion that women are inherently disobedient and cannot be trusted to make good decisions on their own.It's more like 70%. The number of abortions is minuscule compared to the number of miscarriages. Live birth is the exception, not the rule. So if one was truly concerned about the unborn, they'd be donating massive amounts of money towards efforts to prevent miscarriages. The fact that such monies are not being donated, and efforts not being made, might cause one to suspect that the lives of the unborn are not as much of a priority as advertised.
The conclusion I have come to is that the enforcement of conservative sexual ethics is the real goal of the pro-life movement or is at minimum co-equal with stopping abortion. I base this on their rejection of policies that would have prevented massive amounts of abortions, such as the provision of long term birth control in Colorado that reduced unwanted teen pregnancies by 50%, and the denial that the abortion rate has been going down for decades. At this point the movement is near pure sadomoralism.You are correct. It’s always seemed to me that much of religious conservatives’ antipathy to abortion is driven by what I call the “Eve” mindset. Which is the misogynistic notion that women are inherently disobedient and cannot be trusted to make good decisions on their own.
The definitive answer is abortion opponents are completely unwilling to face the grim reality about girls and women needing abortions and support them. Anyone who truly cares about these people would have answered all of my "What is your plan?" questions. Instead all they do is dodge them. This thread will go nowhere until every abortion rights opponent tells me a detailed plan for how the federal and state governments should make sure every pregnant American citizen who is considering an elective abortion will get the help that she needs before and after childbirth. Until all of those problems are solved, the constitutional right to have an abortion will trump God's Word that abortion is murder in the minds of very desperate people who are stuck with unwanted pregnancies.
They also ignored the fact that their own wording it extremely biased one way , i.e. "needing" to kill baby , is quite different from having a way to save safely both mother and child.
Moses was saved as a newborn by being floated in a reed basket /or some kind/, and amazingly was even rescued by ROYALTY, by the Creator's Own Choice,
and his mother was chosen to nurse him .... a miracle .. Saving Lives is The Creator's Joy and Plan.
You completely ignore the fact that there are adoption centers and child protective services that ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT ALLOW ANY CHILD IN THE UNITED STATES TO GO WITHOUT PROPER CARE. I’ve stated this repeatedly and you keep on ignoring it. Furthermore hospitals BY LAW cannot turn away anyone giving child birth. It’s illegal for them to do so. These measures have been in place for almost an entire century now it’s nothing new.
Are you imagining that school teachers moonlight at abortion clinics?A Question to ask Public School Teachers is why kill off fulture Students and chance not having them to teach.
Then I would expect said Scripture to be testable in some way, yet, for the most part, it is not, and those few things in it that can be tested fail when actually put to the test.What if it makes sense, that the Creator works in mysterious/unknown/ ways , and is simply explained in Scripture ?
Believe anyway ? No. Only believe. One Way. This is the work the Creator requires: belief.
The rest of the population stands already condemned, even if alive on earth and prospering, because of unbelief.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?