so if it is not possible to be in the darkness why the encouragment to stay in the Spirit?
Oh it IS possible to "be in darkness", VERY possible; the difference between our beliefs, is that I understand "being-in-the-darkness" is UNSAVED. John3:19 Jesus says (some) men loved DARKNESS and hated the Light. Look at 1Jn1:6:
"If we say we have fellowship with Him and yet WALK IN THE DARKNESS, we lie and do not practice the truth." Can you say that "such a darkness-walker" is SAVED? Can you?
Let's look at 2Pet2:20 (yours is an interesting "take"; I haven't talked with anyone before that said "they remained saved, though tangled/overcome"). You say "believers" --- I agree; there are THREE groups here, the FALSE TEACHERS and the FALSE PROPHETS, who NEVER cease from sin (14) and are SLAVES TO CORRUPTION (19); then there are the TRULY ESCAPED (ontos-apopheugo, vs 18; I understand this is the more credible Greek than "oligos-apopheugo",
barely escaped.) You say, "[real good experiential ]". Excellent. "Epignosis" IS "experiential", cannot refer to "unsaved". Each of these words is used in ch1, to indicate TRUE-SAVED (same faith as Peter); apopheugo-escaped corruption through the epignosis-true-saved knowledge of the Kurios-Lord and Soter-Savior Jesus Christ. Word for word the same. Now, in ch2, they are "again entangled in the defilements and overcome"; can we assert they REMAIN SAVED? No. They WERE "dogs-n-pigs" (by virtue of the vomit/mire in which they dwelt), they RETURNED TO (epistrepho eis/epi) the vomit/mire
and became dogs/pigs AGAIN. It says, "they are WORSE than BEFORE they KNEW (epiginosko) the way of righteousness." Worse than BEFORE they became believers. (How can a SAVED one be WORSE than BEFORE he was saved?) But verse 21 says they KNEW the way of righteousness, and
epistrepho-ek-TURNED-AWAY-from-it! Epistrepho does convey a "spiritual turning/returning". The idea of "they never lost salvation" falls just as surely as the idea of "they were never really SAVED". Context says
"they WERE saved, they became entangled and are now worse than BEFORE they were saved; they are dogs/pigs AGAIN, they have become UNSAVED. Again. Worse than they WERE, 'cause they KNEW the truth and REJECTED it...
2 peter 3:9The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness, but is longsuffering to us-ward[christians..believers..ro 8:1] not willing[determined] that any[eph 1:4] should perish, but that all should come to repentance[changing of ones mind].
The "determined" is actually
more forceful in the Greek. God wills, meaning DESIRES our salvation in verses like Jn6:40 ("thelema"); but DECREE (boulema) is much rarer; what God DESIRES,
MAY happen; what God DECREES,
HAPPENS. In 2Pet3:9 it says: "God does not DECREE (boulemai) any to perish, but MAKES-ROOM (choreo) for ALL to repent.
Now, if you're going to quote Galatians (and I'm very glad you did!), please help me to understand 3:1-3, 5:1-7. Here we have those who RECEIVED the Gospel and BELIEVED; Paul says in 5:7, "you WERE running well"; would Paul have used "RUNNING-WELL" to anyone who was NEVER SAVED? No. Paul says, "who bewitched you into RETURNING to WORKS? Having BEGUN with the Spirit, are you now ENDING with the FLESH? You who seek to be justified by works AGAIN,
you are SEVERED from Christ, you are FALLEN FROM GRACE!" How can "fallen-from-grace", not mean "fallen-from-grace"? You cannot contend "they were never saved" (running well!), you cannot contend they are now STILL SAVED (fallen/severed!) How does this passage stand in a OSAS belief? How?