Calvinism and its Secret Universalism

[dóxatotheó]

“But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. All the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left. “Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’ Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? When did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ The King will answer and say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.’ “Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.’ Then they themselves also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?’ Then He will answer them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”
— Matthew 25:31-46

That isn't partially thats judgement im talking about partially on accordance to Gods love which i quoted the verse Deuteronomy 10 for

 

[dóxatotheó]

If God loves everyone equally, then there’s no need for hell.

False than hell would be based upon humans actions and what it really means to be Chosen in Christ. I believe in free will you know and God love for everyone doesnt change but doesn't mean he wouldnt cast anyone in the lake of fire. Hell is separation from God which I believe happens because persons don't follow Christ which is human choice. Also, that is a strawman.
Also answer my question does God love all babies he create?

 

[Hammster]

That isn't partially thats judgement im talking about partially on accordance to Gods love which i quoted the verse Deuteronomy 10 for

It’s partiality. Some are saved. Some aren’t.

 

[Hammster]

False than hell would be based upon humans actions and what it really means to be Chosen in Christ. I believe in free will you know and God love for everyone doesnt change but doesn't mean he wouldnt cast anyone in the lake of fire. Hell is separation from God which I believe happens because persons don't follow Christ which is human choice.

That doesn’t sound loving at all.

 

[dóxatotheó]

It’s partiality. Some are saved. Some aren’t.

My views on partially ain't on accordance to yours also why does man have to be condemned if they didn't have a choice to choose Christ over the Father times doesn't change so that means God caused them to go to hell not themselves.

 

[dóxatotheó]

That doesn’t sound loving at all.

Humans free will changes God omnibenevolence?
also question yet been answered does God love all babies he create?

 

[renniks]

First off, that doesn’t contradict the Bible. Second, you might want to look at the verses in context where it talks about God not being partial. They don’t state what you think.

God is love. It's not optional for him to love everyone.

 

[dóxatotheó]

God is love. It's not optional for him to love everyone.

Too reinstate what you mean is that God is always love and nothing else correct?

 

[Hammster]

My views on partially ain't on accordance to yours also why does man have to be condemned if they didn't have a choice to choose Christ over the Father times doesn't change so that means God caused them to go to hell not themselves.

People are condemned because of sin. People are saved despite sin. So if God saves some and doesn’t save others, He’s being partial towards those He set His love on.

 

[Hammster]

Humans free will changes God omnibenevolence?
also question yet been answered does God love all babies he create?

Why are you asking me about God’s Omni-benevolence? That’s your term.

 

[Hammster]

God is love. It's not optional for him to love everyone.

And yet, there are people in hell.

 

[dóxatotheó]

People are condemned because of sin. People are saved despite sin. So if God saves some and doesn’t save others, He’s being partial towards those He set His love on

People are condemned because of sin. People are saved because they believe in Christ despite sin. So your insinuating God love changes according to actions even though hes omniscient?

 

[dóxatotheó]

Why are you asking me about God’s Omni-benevolence? That’s your term

means all loving and perfect God is Love literally according to the bible. Secondly, answer my question does God love all babies

 

[Hammster]

So your insinuating God love changes according to actions even though hes omniscient?

Let me remind you of how this started.

P1) God Loves All and desires all to be saved

Your first premise is wrong.

Do you really think that I think that God's love changes?

 

[Hammster]

means all loving and perfect God is Love literally according to the bible. Secondly, answer my question does God love all babies

I know what it means. What I’m saying is that it’s your term, not mine. Nor is it biblical.

 

[dóxatotheó]

Do you really think that I think that God's love changes?

Never insinuated that I said from the very beginning what my views were you just aint answered my questions while i answered yours.

 

[Hammster]

Never insinuated that I said from the very beginning what my views were you just aint answered my questions while i answered yours.

I can’t comprehend that sentence.

 

[dóxatotheó]

Nor is it biblical.

1 John 2:7-8

What I’m saying is that it’s your term, not mine.

Why won't you answer my question?

 

[dóxatotheó]

I can’t comprehend that sentence.

I said I never stated that until you explained your views more often. Its because you never answered my questions while i answered yours.

 

[Hammster]

1 John 2:7-8

What do you think that prices?

Why won't you answer my question?

Because you keep tacking it on the end of posts without explaining how it’s relevant to the posts.