• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Calling all Calvinists

Status
Not open for further replies.

Loveaboveall

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2007
678
10
✟23,379.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can someone explain to me this verse in light of the discussion?

Hebrews 10:26-27 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
 
Upvote 0

ghs1994

Senior Member
Jul 1, 2005
890
65
Ohio
✟23,881.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can someone explain to me this verse in light of the discussion?

Hebrews 10:26-27 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

I believe those who have received the truth, they have heard and come to a comprehensible knowledge of what is true.

They show they do not believe, but reject that truth by living a life based upon that rejection of truth. They have set their life up in opposition to the truth of God's Word. They live their way.

The person the author of Hebrews describes is one who knows the truth, but refuses to accept it. Same thing applies in Hebrews 6:4-6 as well. Remember, it says "received the knowledge of truth", not received salvation. The author is not referring to born again Christians, but gives stern warning to Christians about those who have not believed.

Man is responsible.
 
Upvote 0

Yeshualover

New Member
Aug 3, 2007
4
0
65
Ontario Canada
✟22,614.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
## Certainly :)

God's calling is effectual, and His grace invincible & irresistible, even so - the episode shows that the man did not answer the call of God on that occasion; it says nothing of the rest of his life.

Irresistible grace is irresistible, because man never finally gets the better of it - the all-ruling Sovereignty of God always has the last word :). This is entirely compatible with human refusals that precede our surrender to His grace. Once God has decreed to save a man, that man's salvation in Christ is absolutely certain - no matter how great his rebellion in the mean time. All struggling against God's Will to save, merely becomes another means by which God shows His grace to that person: because all our steps, without exception, are open to, & known by, Him.

Does that clarify ? ##
Amen, I love reformed theology.

Do you understand and fully agree with TULIP?
 
Upvote 0

Yeshualover

New Member
Aug 3, 2007
4
0
65
Ontario Canada
✟22,614.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Can someone explain to me this verse in light of the discussion?

Hebrews 10:26-27 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
Loveaboveall,

Please notice it says willfully, that is habitually, those who are chosen to be his children will over time (time is in His hands) lose the love of the world. We have all been there and are still there to some degree, but thanks be to Yahweh He will cause his saints to persevere. Press on, this short little life is not worth it compared to that which is to come.
 
Upvote 0

TALEdaily

Member
Aug 4, 2007
5
2
38
Magnolia, AR
✟15,137.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
There are many statements to bring to the discussion, but (for now) I'll leave it at this:

Why do Calvinists talk about "Perseverance of the Saints," like WE have been victorious? Wouldn't it be more appropriate, in discussing the sovereignty of God, to say preservation of the saints?

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

GrinningDwarf

Just a humble servant
Mar 30, 2005
2,732
276
60
✟26,811.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
There are many statements to bring to the discussion, but (for now) I'll leave it at this:

Why do Calvinists talk about "Perseverance of the Saints," like WE have been victorious? Wouldn't it be more appropriate, in discussing the sovereignty of God, to say preservation of the saints?

God Bless!

You're correct. Actually, many Calvinists think the traditional wording of the TULIP acronym is somewhat poorly worded. For instance, many think that Total Depravity would more accurately be called Radical Corruption. 'Total Depravity' seems to many to mean that all people are as evil as they possibly could be, which is not the case and something that Calvinists don't claim. As RC Sproul says, even Hitler didn't kill his mother! So a better phrase would be 'Radical Corruption', which better indicates the Calvinist idea that sin corrupts everything that fallen man does.

But then that changes the acronym to RULEP...which kinda messes things up in that regard! :D
 
Upvote 0

cajunhillbilly

Regular Member
Jul 4, 2004
870
37
72
Dallas, TX
✟24,022.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Politics
US-Republican
Actually I had a friend that attended Westminster Seminary in Phillie. They had an exchange program with a Catholic Augustinian Seminary. He said there was not much difference between the two in terms of what they taught on predistination, etc.
 
Upvote 0

DUDLEY61

Member
Aug 27, 2007
7
6
✟22,657.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
I am a former roman catholic and only a Protestant a little over a year. I have been a convert to the Presbyterian fold only since last February but I am now an avowed Calvinist Presbyterian. I wrote the following to many Presbyterian friends today and I am sharing it with all of you.
Dudley

October 5th 2007

To all my friends in the Presbyterian fold,

The following are the reasons I became a Presbyterian Calvinist Protestant. They are based on James Tucketts letter "Foundation of faith part 1"

I believe the Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Orthodox Presbyterian teachings is the only Christian theology that truly helps people to see their sinfulness and the need for salvation.

i also believe that the Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Orthodox Presbyterian teachings is the only Christian theology that truly helps people see that God is sovereign and has a wonderful plan for their lives.

The Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Orthodox Presbyterian teachings is the only Christian theology that truly helps people see that Jesus Christ died for their sins; that He paid the full price for their salvation.

The Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Orthodox Presbyterian teachings is the only Christian theology that truly helps people see the trustworthiness of God's irresistible grace . . . to lead them to the good works for which they were created; to convict them of their sin; to strengthen them when they become weak or weary.

The Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Orthodox Presbyterian teachings is the only Christian theology that truly helps people see they are eternally secure in Christ.

I agree with James Tuckett that "According to the grace of God which was given to me, as a wise master builder I have laid the foundation, and another builds on it. But let each one take heed how he builds on it. For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ."

I Cor. 3: 10-11

The celebration of the Lords Supper according to the Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Orthodox Presbyterian teachings is the only sacramental celebration of the "communion" of true Christians. I now believe The Presbyterian teaching of The Lord's Supper is the most biblically and theologically correct. As a Presbyterian I now believe that it was instituted by Jesus the same night he was betrayed, to be only a symbolic remembrance of the sacrifice of himself in his death and for our spiritual nourishment, and growth in him, and as a bond and pledge of our communion with him, and with each other.


The Roman catholic teaching of transubstantiation I now believe is the most inaccurate and theologically unsound form of the Lords Supper. I now experience the presence of the Lord when I receive the Lords Supper as a Protestant Presbyterian that was never present for me when I was a Roman catholic. Further the worship of the bread wafer placed in an Elaborate Gold Monstrance is the most abominable practice any church which says it is Christian can do. It is not only a distortion of the true meaning of the sacrament and ordinance of the Lords Supper it is in itself idolatry and an insult to the sacrifice Of Our Savior on Calvary.

The roman sacrifice of the mass as a continuing sacrifice of Christ's sacrifice on Calvary is also awful and should not be imitated by Protestants as is the case in the Anglican, Episcopal and Lutheran churches today. The Protestant Reformation and its cause and true teachings are best defended by Presbyterians in our way and teaching of the Lords Supper.

Jim Tuckett quoted Albert Einstein "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result." I think that is the best definition of the Roman mass and Lords Supper as celebrated by Rome and the church of Rome. Unfortunately many Protestants do not understand that in the way I do as a former roman catholic who is now a Presbyterian Protestant.

When I first converted to the Presbyterian Protestant fold I thought I missed the weekly and regular celebration of the Eucharist as I knew it as a Roam catholic. However my thinking there has changed also. I am now more inline with many Presbyterians who cling to the administration once a month of the Lords Supper. I have no problem with more frequent celebration as long as we do not confuse its true meaning as taught by Calvin.

I believe that the Presbyterian order of worship is biblically correct and its simplicity reveals the truth of the Gospel of Christ. The reading of the Scriptures, preaching, and hearing the Word of God, teaching one another in psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, and singing to the Lord; as well as the administration once a month of the Lords Supper and also the administration of Baptism are all parts of religious worship of God as it should be. It is as I have witnessed done with understanding, faith, reverence, and solemn humiliation in a holy and religious manner. I have attended worship services at all denominations I am most comfortable with the Presbyterian order of worship.

As Reformed Presbyterian Protestants we must be vigilant and on our guard to any teaching which give an element of other than Christ as our savior and mediator. I renounce Other Mediators Between God and Man, as Presbyterian Protestant I now go directly to God and his Son, Jesus Christ. Christ only is the head of his church. No other man is or can be the head of Christ's church. Our governmental structure of presbytery and elders is also the most biblically correct and must be upheld and defended.

God bless,
Dudley
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.