• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Calculations for Enoch's Calendar, Which is God's Calendar, Forever

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian

Show me an extant copy from prior to the 1st century. (takes time for a book to be accepted as authoritative you know.)

Then prove that this is the same book that Jude quoted. All you have is one verse quoted by him.
 
Upvote 0

Noxot

anarchist personalist
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2007
8,192
2,452
38
dallas, texas
Visit site
✟253,899.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

what spiritual people say that enoch is not from God? btw you can corrupt your view of Jesus Christ by reading any book of the NT and OT. let me remind everyone once again that there were many religious people that read the OT in the days of Jesus and they did not know God who was right in front of them.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The OT gives an accurate view of Jesus Christ because it is inspired scripture. The book of Enoch is likely to corrupt true doctrinal truth.

.
In the OT, "the Son of Man in heaven", who was with God and who was God, is not found named as that, anywhere. He is there, but Enoch reveals Him so that when He came, the rest is understood.
Take for instance the fact that to the Son of Man in heaven every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that He is LORD, to the glory of God. Paul read Enoch and knew that the Son of Man to whom every knee would bow and every tongue would confess is the LORD Jesus Christ: the passage in Isaiah does not say to Jesus Christ as the Son of Man in heaven every knee will bow and every tongue confess, but YHWH says it, in Isaiah.

Enoch had already revealed that the Son of Man in heaven is God to whom every knee shall bow and every tongue will confess, and so Paul writes from Enoch that Jesus Christ is that One: not as a new revelation, which Paul could not bring or else he would be a false prophet and teacher, but as understanding what is already written, and now revealed.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Show me an extant copy from prior to the 1st century. (takes time for a book to be accepted as authoritative you know.)

Then prove that this is the same book that Jude quoted. All you have is one verse quoted by him.
Most of the opening passage of Enoch is quoted by Jude, the womb brother of Jesus [Jesus' earthly family loved and studied Enoch: Mary also quoted from it].
There is enough of the fragments in the DSS manuscript copies to prove the Ethiopian manuscripts are uncorrupted over time, and that Jude indeed quoted from Enoch the prophet, the seventh from Adam -as Jude said.

BTW: this is not to prove Enoch, but rather, to show those interested that the calendar can be calculated according to what the angel Uriel revealed to Enoch as God's calendar "unto eternity", and that it does not change -so anyone with interest can discover the times and seasons and years, to the number exactly, of them.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Originally Posted by Habakk

The OT gives an accurate view of Jesus Christ because it is inspired scripture. The book of Enoch is likely to corrupt true doctrinal truth.



quote yeshuasavedme: In the OT, "the Son of Man in heaven", who was with God and who was God, is not found named as that, anywhere. He is there, but Enoch reveals Him so that when He came, the rest is understood.
Take for instance the fact that to the Son of Man in heaven every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that He is LORD, to the glory of God. Paul read Enoch and knew that the Son of Man to whom every knee would bow and every tongue would confess is the LORD Jesus Christ: the passage in Isaiah does not say to Jesus Christ as the Son of Man in heaven every knee will bow and every tongue confess, but YHWH says it, in Isaiah.

Enoch had already revealed that the Son of Man in heaven is God to whom every knee shall bow and every tongue will confess, and so Paul writes from Enoch that Jesus Christ is that One: not as a new revelation, which Paul could not bring or else he would be a false prophet and teacher, but as understanding what is already written, and now revealed.
Also, in the OT, the Son of Man is not said to have all judgment committed to Him by the Father. Only Enoch states that fact -which Jesus confirms.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
i'm not good with math... someone tell me how many enoch years have passed since Jesus was born =(


I am not either, but the links I pasted from have calculations on them...
Except I do not think either of them begin with Rosh Hashanah, which begins the years counted from creation.

BTW: it seems that the extra day added to our calendars is made up by taking a little off each day through the year, but if one calculates from sunset to sunset, beginning at the time Enoch wrote of for the portals the sun enters through and the stars lead the seasons, by, and then counts the days of the week skipping a count for the head of the seasons, but adding it to the end of the year, then they will have it exactly.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Habakk

Prayer Team †
Jun 10, 2011
12,015
3,741
Teesside
✟51,450.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

That’s not true as there was the thought amongst some groups of that time period of similar ideas concerning the devar/memra or logos. Philo the jewish philosopher was one of them.
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican


Your understanding is that of evening beginning at sunset but...you are mistaken, as was I before I saw the meaning.

Even-ing BEGINS when the sun is directly EVEN with the earth...with as much light before it as behind it. Before it reaches that apex it is morning and remains morning until 12:00 after which it is the beginning of evening which ends when the sun sets. As written, "the evening and the morning were the first day." Knowing that...when did the day start?

Notice that night is not included in those six days. It isn't written that the evening, morning and night were the first day...just the evening and morning.

Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
...
Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
One day is the period of darkness and the period of light, taken from the beginning of the darkness period because God began the creation with the darkness, first, then said; "let there be light", and there was light.....the evening is the darkness, the light is the day.
The sunset begins the darkness called Night and the dawning begins the light called Day.

In Enoch there are 18 parts to one day of evening and morning =day and night periods.
But the parts are shortened and lengthened in each day [but for two in the year], for each, as the sun goes around the earth in its path in the heavens, rising through the six portals, back and forth, in the year [which heavens also circle the earth, from the beginning of creation as we read in Enoch and in the Tenach and NT].
In the shortest night in one Day, the night equals 6 parts and the day 12. In the shortest day in one Day, the day equals 6 parts and the night 12.

 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican



Please read God's Word and His name is not Enoch...God didn't begin with darkness. Once the earth became void then darkness was upon the face of the deep. God began this age with light.
Genesis 1:3-5 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day
What was the first day? EVENING AND THE MORNING...the LIGHT is called Day and there is no light in the darkness so the darkness was not "the first day."
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,651
29,244
Pacific Northwest
✟817,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
There's also the question of when the Epistle of St. Jude was written. It was part of the Antilegomena in the ancient Church, among the writings considered disputed. Jude is quite possibly a fairly late text anyway. There's no universally accepted consensus on when Jude was written, which could be at the very tail end of the first century through the first half of the 2nd century. By the end of the 2nd century it was widely embraced, through some held reservations about it, Eusebius mentions it still being disputed (antilegomena) when he wrote in the 4th century. However, Jude has its place in the earliest known biblical codices: Sinaiticus, Vaticanus (presumably, as the text is damaged and missing after Hebrews), and Alexandrinus.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
...What was the first day? EVENING AND THE MORNING...the LIGHT is called Day and there is no light in the darkness so the darkness was not "the first day."
In Genesis, the evening and the morning [the night time and the day time] =one/echad day.
The word "first" is not in Genesis as to the numbering of the first day, but the naming of the Echad/one [as in unit] Day as being made of the darkness and the light periods. The moon governs the night and the sun governs the day, but together, they are one unit, one echad, called "Day".
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That’s not true as there was the thought amongst some groups of that time period of similar ideas concerning the devar/memra or logos. Philo the jewish philosopher was one of them.


Philo???? You want to get wisdom and doctrine from Philo???? -you put foot in mouth!
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican



Do you not think it very, very dangerous to place your understanding over that of God? Please see these words, His words.

Genesis 1:3-5 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day

What was the first day? EVENING AND THE MORNING were the first day and no night is mentioned as being day. GOD CALLEDLIGHT Day and the night is NOT LIGHT....there is no light in the darkness so the darkness was not "the first day."


Now, go ahead and argue some more with Him but know...the following may apply to those that do this.....

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
 
Reactions: Habakk
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
779
✟105,205.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
After this post, I will not respond to this argument of yours anymore.
Use a concordance and please note that the Hebrew language is not "first" in Genesis for "one day", but "echad", which is "one" as in a unit. Your English translation is not inspired as the Hebrew is, and it makes a doctrine for you which is not biblical at all.

The evening and the morning were one/echad "Day", together, and so it has been ever since, and the one/echad day of creation was followed by five more of them, all evenings and mornings, and we can count them in succession, but the evening/darkness and morning/light/day, together "echad", were called/named "Day".
 
Upvote 0