S
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, I am wondering if he pulled this belief out of 1 Corinthians 6:18 (NKJV) Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.I follow The Bible's teachings, NOT Lewis' teachings.
Lewis writes in Mere Christianity, "Finally, though I have had to speak at some length about sex, I want to make it as clear as I possibly can that the center of Christian morality is not here. If anyone thinks that Christians regard unchastity as the supreme vice, he is quite wrong. The sins of the flesh are bad, but they are the least bad of all sins. All the worst pleasures are purely spiritual. The pleasure of putting other people in the wrong, of bossing and patronizing and spoiling sport, and backbiting; the pleasures of power, of hatred. For there are two things inside me [ ] they are the animal self and the diabolical self; and the diabolical self is the worst of the two. That is why a cold self-righteous prig who goes regularly to church may be far nearer to hell than a prostitute. But of course it is better to be neither."
Does anyone agree with Lewis? If so, please provide some support.
Dear EphraimanestiMY BROTHER,
SIN IS SIN, and i don't believe that God has a ranking whereby some sins are "better" than others.
That being said, i don't believe that this is what Mr. Lewis is trying to communicate. It seems to me that what he is saying is that the sins of the flesh--consisting primarily of the misuse or abuse of our God-given physical drives ["our animal self"]--are the easiest to deal with and overcome because they are the more obvious and therefore easier to recognize, surrender to God, and work towards erraticating. Those sins of the spirit which he mentions, on the other hand, are deeply entrenched in our hearts--planted there by the Evil One--and thus are harder to recognize and thus harder to erraticate--much harder the the obvious physical sins.
Physical sins tend to be black and white and without justification or excuse. The spiritual sins, however, because of their more indistinct and nebulous nature, lend themselves to rationalizations, justifications, denial, etc., which allows them to cling to us very tenaciously. This is one primary reason, i think, as to why the Law could never bring about righteousness before God: the Law dealt ONLY with the physical aspects of sin, leaving the spiritual sins alive and well in the heart. Jesus, on the other hand, by FULFILLING the Law, dealt with the heart as well as the body, teaching, for example, that looking lustfully at a woman WAS THE SAME AS actually commiting adultery, or being angry WAS THE SAME AS commiting murder. Thus, through the Grace of our Lord, we can now be cleansed of BOTH the physical and the spiritual sins and stand righteous before our God. ALL GLORY TO HIM!
A BOND-SLAVE OF CHRIST,
ephraim
deleted.im not sure how one can argue that one sin is less than another sin when we are all sinful, and so many sins walk hand in hand. forget our stereotypes for a second, is it immpossible for a prostitute to be cold of heart or the church going prig to be an adulterer? far from it i imagine, but im guessing its the one who the lord lets see thier sins for what they are that is the one nearest to the narrow gate.
edit : i thought ive read that sins against your self are the least (personnally i wouldnt put suicide in this category as of the pain and blame it places on to others, or buying pornography, but tbh ive no idea)
Why then are there lists of sins in The Bible, where The Bible says that if you commit these particular sins , without repenting of them, you will not inherit The Kingdom of Heaven ?I suppose the problem is from our perspective is that we like to pile up our sins in little piles and see whos pile is the highest. God however looks at it from above and doesn't really see how big the pile is he just sees the pile of sin. For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God
J20
It was my understanding that it was those types of sinners, not Christians, who will not inherit the kingdom.Why then are there lists of sins in The Bible, where The Bible says that if you commit these particular sins , without repenting of them, you will not inherit The Kingdom of Heaven ?What will happen to Christians if they die having not confessed sin in their life ? Will they go to heaven or hell ?
Dear FrauleinElsaOkay, I've given this some considerable thought and have come to this conclusion. What C.S. Lewis wrote in his book which I'm currently reading right now as a matter of fact, is his interpretation. It's his point of view and only what he thinks. He wasn't God and wasn't trying to be. He was merely talking about the issues in the way that he understood them. I believe he was sincere in his efforts to make the topics he wrote about easier to understand. That's my take on it. Ultimately, his views are the views that he held and nothing more.
Yes, I have a feeling that is the case. If so, I am disappointed that Lewis would state his personal belief like it is some undisputed matter of fact.Okay, I've given this some considerable thought and have come to this conclusion. What C.S. Lewis wrote in his book which I'm currently reading right now as a matter of fact, is his interpretation. It's his point of view and only what he thinks. He wasn't God and wasn't trying to be. He was merely talking about the issues in the way that he understood them. I believe he was sincere in his efforts to make the topics he wrote about easier to understand. That's my take on it. Ultimately, his views are the views that he held and nothing more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?