Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Revisit that post.
I repeat: my reply is still the same.
You argue from a point of ignorance, and you seem to revel in it. You revel in your refusal to learn that which you argue against.
That's not a good attitude.
Why engage in an exercise of futility?
Yeah, why do I talk to you?
Wait, wait, wait - before this thread gets derailed, I am interested.
Somehow, turning a bed lamp is a change that is not an "Evolution", but the instinct to utilize the lamp for survival is Evolution - because more that use artificial light survive than those that don't...
I think this is interesting; as I said "there is a selection pressure for Evolutionists to make Evolution interesting" (because the ones that can't make it interesting are forgotten) - somehow instinct develops about which is a valid way to determine "Evolution" (as here, is the instinct as to how to say Evolution - which would be, if it survived, a more popular way of saying it, depending on how interesting it was made).
I think you are on the verge of making sense, that choices about instinct made over a lifetime, influence the epigenome of a given species, never to abandon their kind, but to make more of it (that kind); it's sort of a way of saying "learning is not uniformly universal".
Hi there,
So this is simple: words can be repeated in different pitches - correct?
If I took a sample of the pitches used to pronounce the word "Evolution" - I could work out a consensus about which species and where, was most likely to be believed "evolved"?
Further, I could take a survey over time as to who was evolved and I could determine who is most likely to understand a certain pitch being evolved??
This is a scientifically verifiable proposition, is it not?
Thoughts?
Economists speak nonsense. It's a requirement in all their degree courses.
Yes. Words can be spoken in different ways. They can be spoken quickly or slowly, high pitched or low pitched.
However, that does not alter the concepts that the words are used to describe. It doesn't matter howq a person says the word "evolution", it will still mean the same thing.
I have two lamps on my desk. Does this mean I am more evolved?Wait, wait, wait - before this thread gets derailed, I am interested.
Somehow, turning a bed lamp is a change that is not an "Evolution", but the instinct to utilize the lamp for survival is Evolution - because more that use artificial light survive than those that don't...
I think this is interesting; as I said "there is a selection pressure for Evolutionists to make Evolution interesting" (because the ones that can't make it interesting are forgotten) - somehow instinct develops about which is a valid way to determine "Evolution" (as here, is the instinct as to how to say Evolution - which would be, if it survived, a more popular way of saying it, depending on how interesting it was made).
I think you are on the verge of making sense, that choices about instinct made over a lifetime, influence the epigenome of a given species, never to abandon their kind, but to make more of it (that kind); it's sort of a way of saying "learning is not uniformly universal".
I just mean, typically when you say the end of a word with an upper pitch, it means you are questioning it.
So if a lot of people, were ending the word "Evolution" in a lower pitch, it would mean that more people (at least believed) they understood Evolution (enough not to question it).
So a lot of people believing in Evolution, would establish whether they were actually evolved, by creating measurable evidence between what they believed and what they did (how they sounded).
It's not a hard concept, its just about the saturation level of a particular belief.
Ah ok, so you're asking if the intonation a person uses when saying the word 'evolution' might indicate whether or not they are really convinced by the ToE?
but the instinct to utilize the lamp for survival is Evolution
Yes, that, or conversely, whether being convinced, meant that they expressed Evolution more greatly...
You really need to stop now.I just mean, typically when you say the end of a word with an upper pitch, it means you are questioning it.
So if a lot of people, were ending the word "Evolution" in a lower pitch, it would mean that more people (at least believed) they understood Evolution (enough not to question it).
So a lot of people believing in Evolution, would establish whether they were actually evolved, by creating measurable evidence between what they believed and what they did (how they sounded).
It's not a hard concept, its just about the saturation level of a particular belief.
You really need to stop now.I just mean, typically when you say the end of a word with an upper pitch, it means you are questioning it.
So if a lot of people, were ending the word "Evolution" in a lower pitch, it would mean that more people (at least believed) they understood Evolution (enough not to question it).
So a lot of people believing in Evolution, would establish whether they were actually evolved, by creating measurable evidence between what they believed and what they did (how they sounded).
It's not a hard concept, its just about the saturation level of a particular belief.
I just mean, typically when you say the end of a word with an upper pitch, it means you are questioning it.
So if a lot of people, were ending the word "Evolution" in a lower pitch, it would mean that more people (at least believed) they understood Evolution (enough not to question it).
So a lot of people believing in Evolution, would establish whether they were actually evolved, by creating measurable evidence between what they believed and what they did (how they sounded).
It's not a hard concept, its just about the saturation level of a particular belief.
I just mean, typically when you say the end of a word with an upper pitch, it means you are questioning it.
So if a lot of people, were ending the word "Evolution" in a lower pitch, it would mean that more people (at least believed) they understood Evolution (enough not to question it).
So a lot of people believing in Evolution, would establish whether they were actually evolved, by creating measurable evidence between what they believed and what they did (how they sounded).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?