Well, you are the one who should give me the evidence that it does not the opposite, all the givens we have at 70 AD are some fragments, so you should prove to me that these fragments belong to the NT (I mean the 70 AD fragments), but 200 years gap is too long,
I really don't see why you argue day and night over this issue. How can you make any use of "time lag" as an argument and then expect christians to turn to the Quran as a correction, despite the lack of historical support for its accuracy compared to the bible? Your whole point seems like a humongously invalid argument. Accepting an account that is 650 years later to me is illogical and incredible, particularly for people who claim to believe God is capable of preserving his word. Your argument is that God is incapable of preserving his word, particularly for someone whom God glorified more than Muhammad. Why do you believe that God is capable or inept? You can't believe a contradiction and then expect me to buy it.
Upvote
0