Ryoko Ozaki said:
Tariki, feel free to add your own ideas to help people understand Buddhism better. It would be nice if we could hopefully make people understand it enough so that they don't critique it without knowledge of it.
Ryoko,
Thanks for the invitation............
I think its important to understand that "Buddhism" is a Western word given to a whole range of practices that have been followed in the heartlands of the faith for 2500 years. The West just loves its "isms" and its "ologies", not to mention its "ainities".............Just like Christianity, with its Catholocism, Eastern Orthodox and the various and seemingly unending Protestant "flavours".........the Buddhadharma too has its varities..........Theravada, as practiced in Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand.................Mahayana, which embraces virtually all the other brands (to keep it simple).
Theravada sees the Buddha as a teacher, not a saviour........he taught the way to the end of suffering, leaving behind his teachings - the Dharma - and, in effect, the message......."Buddha's can only point the way, each has to walk the path themselves." The ideal in Theravada is the Arahat, a person who has followed and practiced the teaching to its final conclusion, to the heartwood of the Dharma...........the end of suffering. The ideal in Mahayana is the Bodhisattva, who seeks enlightenment not for themselves alone, but for all..............leading to the verse from the Bodhicayavatara so loved by the Dalai Lama........"so long as the earth endures, so long as space endures, so too may I endure, ending the sufferings of the world." In Mahayana, the Buddha becomes in effect a "cosmic principle" - rather than just a human teacher.
One of the great Buddhist scriptures is the Lotus Sutra, which contains the parable of the Dharma rain...........dharma - natural truth that needs no revelation - falls like rain, equally on all, and each will respond according to their individuality. This points to the word used in Theravada when referring to the dharma itself........"ehipassiko".............or.."come and see, for oneself"
One of the keys to understanding the Dharma is the way the Buddha himself referred to his teachings.........likening them to a raft.........."for crossing over, not for holding onto" One of the most significant references to this is a Sutta in the Majjhima Nikaya - a Theravada text - where, after the Buddha has taught his deepest truths and assured himself that those who have heard have understood correctly, he says.........."purified and bright as this view is, if you adhere to it, cherish it, treasure it, and treat it as a possession, would you then understand the Dharma that has been taught as similar to a raft, being for the purpose of crossing over, not for the purpose of grasping?"
Another cornerstone to understanding the dharma is the famous sutta in the Anguttara Nikaya.............the Kalama sutta....."Do not be satisfied with hearsay or with tradition or with legendary lore or with what has come down in scriptures or with conjecture or with logical inference or with weighing the evidence or with liking for a view after pondering over it or with someone else's ability or with the thought: ' The master is my teacher.' When you know in yourselves: 'These things are wholesome, blameless, commended by the wise, and being adopted and put into effect they lead to welfare and happiness,' then you should practice and abide in them."
This is NOT a "freethinkers" charter! "Do not be satisfied" are key words........and also the words........"commended by the wise". Well, who are the wise? Perhaps each much make their choice!!
And finally, I think myself that questions and answers go together. Buddhism - to use the Western term - begins with a fact, the fact of suffering.............a human reality that is undeniable. Therefore it should remain totally existential in its thinking..............once it drifts into mind games for the sake of mind games, it ceases to be itself (not unknown in Buddhist circles, unfortunately).........."I teach this and this alone, suffering and the ending of suffering"
Anyway, enough for now. Perhaps enough ammunition here for our Christian friends to aim at............
P.S. Just popped back.............I would just add that it is the "anatta" teaching - no-self - that provides the keystone to forestall any Christian criticism of "Buddhist pride" and reliance upon "self", rather than "submission" to "God's Truth" as "revealed".
(From a Buddhist standpoint, to truly "understand" the "no-self" teaching is to be enlightened)