• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

bowl judgments step by step

Status
Not open for further replies.

gwynedd1

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2006
2,631
77
57
✟25,593.00
Faith
Christian
The bowl Judgments:

We will see that John's vision accurately depicted the wrath that came upon Judea.


Revelation 16

3The second angel poured out his bowl (G)into the sea, and it became blood like that of a dead man; and every living [a]thing in the sea died.

Josephus Wars of the Jews Book 3 chapter 9 section 3

And much lamentation there was when the ships were dashed against one another, and a terrible noise when they were broken to pieces; and some of the multitude that were in them were covered with waves, and so perished, and a great many were embarrassed with shipwrecks. But some of them thought that to die by their own swords was lighter than by the sea, and so they killed themselves before they were drowned; although the greatest part of them were carried by the waves, and dashed to pieces against the abrupt parts of the rocks, insomuch that the sea was bloody a long way, and the maritime parts were full of dead bodies; for the Romans came upon those that were carried to the shore, and destroyed them; and the number of the bodies that were thus thrown out of the sea was four thousand and two hundred. The Romans also took the city without opposition, and utterly demolished it.

Revelation 16

9Men were scorched with fierce heat; and they (U)blasphemed the name of God who has the power over these plagues, and they (V)did not repent so as to (W)give Him glory. 10Then the fifth angel poured out his bowl on the (X)throne of the beast, and his kingdom became (Y)darkened; and they gnawed their tongues because of pain,

Josephus Wars of the Jews Book 3 Chapter 4 section 1

By this means he provoked the Romans to treat the country according to the law of war; nor did the Romans, out of the anger they bore at this attempt, leave off, either by night or by day, burning the places in the plain, and stealing away the cattle that were in the country, and killing whatsoever appeared capable of fighting perpetually, and leading the weaker people as slaves into captivity; so that Galilee was all over filled with fire and blood; nor was it exempted from any kind of misery or calamity, for the only refuge they had was this, that when they were pursued, they could retire to the cities which had walls built them by Josephus.

Revelation 16

12The sixth angel poured out his bowl on the (AD)great river, the Euphrates; and (AE)its water was dried up, so that (AF)the way would be prepared for the kings (AG)from the east.

13And I saw coming out of the mouth of the (AH)dragon and out of the mouth of the (AI)beast and out of the mouth of the (AJ)false prophet, three (AK)unclean spirits like (AL)frogs;

Tacitus Histories book 5

Early in this year Titus Caesar, who had been selected by his father to complete the subjugation of Judaea, and who had gained distinction as a soldier while both were still subjects, began to rise in power and reputation, as armies and provinces emulated each other in their attachment to him. The young man himself, anxious to be thought superior to his station, was ever displaying his gracefulness and his energy in war. By his courtesy and affability he called forth a willing obedience, and he often mixed with the common soldiers, while working or marching, without impairing his dignity as general.He found in Judaea three legions, the 5th, the 10th, and the 15th, all old troops of Vespasian's. To these he added the 12th from Syria, and some men belonging to the 18th and 3rd, whom he had withdrawn from Alexandria. This force was accompanied by twenty cohorts of allied troops and eight squadrons of cavalry, by the two kings Agrippa and Sohemus, by the auxiliary forces of king Antiochus, by a strong contingent of Arabs, who hated the Jews with the usual hatred of neighbours, and, lastly, by many persons brought from the capital and from Italy by private hopes of securing the yet unengaged affections of the Prince. With this force Titus entered the enemy's territory, preserving strict order on his march, reconnoitring every spot, and always ready to give battle. At last he encamped near Jerusalem.

---
I will briefly interject that this is a work describing actions about the Parthia which competed for the region. This was an action that went poorly for Rome as I recall However the context of the Kings of the East is quite clear. We have three Kings of the East involved in the Judean war stationed about the river Euphrates. This better identifies who these were in Tacitus Histories. A perfect fit for one of the bowl judgments.
---

BOOK XIII. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus, The Works of Tacitus, vol. 2 - Annals (Books 4-6, 11-16) [120 AD]

Whilst these and the like discourses employed the public, Nero, to supply the Legions in the East, ordered recruits to be raised through the neighbouring provinces, and the Legions themselves to be posted near to Armenia; as also that the ancient Kings, Agrippa and Antiochus should make ready their forces, such as might enable them to invade the territories of the Parthians; and that bridges should be forthwith made upon the Euphrates. To Aristobulus he moreover committed the lesser Armenia, and the region of Sophenes to Sohemus, with the ensigns of Royalty and title of Kings. There arose likewise to Vologeses a competitor for his Crown, even his own son Vardanes. Hence the Parthians withdrew from Armenia, yet so as if they meant to return, and only postponed the war.


Revelation 16

17Then the seventh angel poured out his bowl upon (AX)the air, and a (AY)loud voice came out of the (AZ)temple from the throne, saying, "(BA)It is done."18And there were flashes of (BB)lightning and sounds and peals of thunder; and there was (BC)a great earthquake, such as there had not been since man came to be upon the earth(land), so great an earthquake was it, and so mighty.

Tacitus book 5 Histories

the temple illuminated by a sudden radiance from the clouds. The doors of the inner shrine were suddenly thrown open, and a voice of more than mortal tone was heard to cry that the Gods were departing. At the same instant there was a mighty stir as of departure



Revelation 16

19(BE)The great city was split into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell (BF)Babylon the great was (BG)remembered before God, to give her (BH)the cup of the wine of His fierce wrath.

Josephus Wars of the Jews Book 5 Chapter 1

4. And now there were three treacherous factions in the city, the one parted from the other. Eleazar and his party, that kept the sacred first-fruits, came against John in their cups.


Revelation 16

21And (BJ)huge hailstones, about [c]one hundred pounds each(a talent), came down from heaven upon men; and men (BK)blasphemed God because of the (BL)plague of the hail, because its plague was extremely severe.

Josephus Wars of the Jews book 5 chapter 6

Now the stones that were cast were of the weight of a talent, and were carried two furlongs and further. The blow they gave was no way to be sustained, not only by those that stood first in the way, but by those that were beyond them for a great space. As for the Jews, they at first watched the coming of the stone, for it was of a white color, and could therefore not only be perceived by the great noise it made, but could be seen also before it came by its brightness; accordingly the watchmen that sat upon the towers gave them notice when the engine was let go, and the stone came from it, and cried out aloud, in their own country language, THE STONE COMETH (15) so those that were in its way stood off, and threw themselves down upon the ground; by which means, and by their thus guarding themselves, the stone fell down and did them no harm. But the Romans contrived how to prevent that by blacking the stone, who then could aim at them with success, when the stone was not discerned beforehand, as it had been till then; and so they destroyed many of them at one blow. Yet did not the Jews, under all this distress, permit the Romans to raise their banks in quiet; but they shrewdly and boldly exerted themselves, and repelled them both by night and by day.
 
Last edited:
B

Bible2

Guest
The first step is the first vial (or bowl) of
Revelation 16:2, which (like Revelation 13:14-18)
has never happened.

The second step is the second vial (or bowl) of
Revelation 16:3, which (like Revelation 8:8-9) has
never happened. Josephus' "Wars of the Jews", book 3,
chapter 9, section 3, doesn't refer to the death of
every living soul in the sea, but only to the death
of some people in just one little part of the sea.

The third step is the third vial (or bowl) of
Revelation 16:4-7, which (like Revelation 8:10-11)
has never happened.

The fourth step is the fourth vial (or bowl) of
Revelation 16:8-9, which has never happened.
Josephus' "Wars of the Jews", book 3, chapter 4,
section 1, doesn't refer to the sun scorching men
with fire and great heat, but only to the Romans
burning places in Galilee.

The fifth step is the fifth vial (or bowl) of
Revelation 16:10-11, which (like Revelation 8:12) has
never happened.

The sixth step is the sixth vial (or bowl) of
Revelation 16:12-16, which (like Revelation 19:19-21)
has never happened. Tacitus' "Histories", book 5,
and his "Annals", book 13, don't say that the
Euphrates was dried up so that the kings east of
the Euphrates might cross and gather at Armageddon
(Har Megiddo: Mount Megiddo in northern Israel); or
that three unclean spirits like frogs came out of the
mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false
prophet; or that these spirits of devils, working
miracles, went forth to the kings of the whole world
to gather them to Armageddon in an attempt to fight
Jesus at his return (Revelation 19:19-21). Tacitus'
"Histories", book 5, only says that Titus put
together some forces to fight the Jews in Jerusalem;
and Tacitus' "Annals", book 13, only says that Nero
readied some forces near the Euphrates and ordered
that bridges be built across it so that they might
attack the Parthians to the east.

The seventh step is the seventh vial (or bowl) of
Revelation 16:17-21, which (like Revelation 6:12-17)
has never happened. Tacitus' "Histories", book 5,
and Josephus' "Wars of the Jews", book 5, chapters
1 and 6, don't say that there came a great voice out
of the temple in heaven (cf. Revelation 14:17, 11:19),
from the throne of God, saying, "It is done"; or that
there were voices, thunders, lightnings, and an
earthquake larger than has ever happened in the
history of mankind, so that the great city was broken
up into three parts, and the cities of the nations
fell, and great Babylon suffered God's wrath, and
every island fled away, and the mountains weren't
found; or that there fell huge hailstones out of
heaven; or that people blasphemed God because the
plague of the hailstones was so terrible. Tacitus'
"Histories", book 5, only purports that a voice came
out of the earthly temple saying that "the Gods" were
departing; and Josephus' "Wars of the Jews", book 5,
chapter 1, only refers to three political factions
within Jerusalem; and chapter 6 only refers to the
Romans lobbing some large (not hail) stones into
Jerusalem.

Preterism can't return and say that futurists are
foolish to await a literal fulfillment of Revelation
16, after preterism has ransacked ancient newspapers
as it were to try to latch onto the slightest scraps
that it can find of purported literal fulfillments of
mere scattered bits and pieces of Revelation 16.
 
Upvote 0

HisdaughterJen

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2007
16,026
446
this side of eternity
✟18,732.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It's weird, Gwynedd1, your assumption places the beast as the Jews and God's wrath as the Romans. You're stuck in 70AD. Isaiah 47 helps to negate your conclusions.

In the near future, the beast is the WORLDWIDE system of the devil under the leadership of a "mouthpiece" and when he gets wounded, then a false prophet. The wrath of God, in the form of bowl judgments, will be exactly as described...sores, salt waters to blood, fresh waters to blood, intense scorching sun, darkness, the Euphrates drying up to allows for the kings to gather to Armageddon, followed by heaven opening and Christ's physical return.

Mystery Babylon is what remains of the Roman Empire. (Isaiah 47, Rev 17/18, Zech 1 & 2) She is the "Daughter of the Babylonians", the "land of the North", proud "queen" described in those passages.
 
Upvote 0

gwynedd1

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2006
2,631
77
57
✟25,593.00
Faith
Christian
It's weird, Gwynedd1, your assumption places the beast as the Jews and God's wrath as the Romans. You're stuck in 70AD. Isaiah 47 helps to negate your conclusions.

In the near future, the beast is the WORLDWIDE system of the devil under the leadership of a "mouthpiece" and when he gets wounded, then a false prophet. The wrath of God, in the form of bowl judgments, will be exactly as described...sores, salt waters to blood, fresh waters to blood, intense scorching sun, darkness, the Euphrates drying up to allows for the kings to gather to Armageddon, followed by heaven opening and Christ's physical return.

Mystery Babylon is what remains of the Roman Empire. (Isaiah 47, Rev 17/18, Zech 1 & 2) She is the "Daughter of the Babylonians", the "land of the North", proud "queen" described in those passages.


Hi HisdaughterJen,

I am curious how you arrive at that conclusion that this states the Beast is the Jews?

I will tell you plainly the beast is Rome and Jerusalem was the harlot.

Did Rome and the harlot work together to persecute Christians? Yes.

Did Rome destroy the harlot? Yes.
Did God use pagan nations to judge Israel? Yes.
Was Rome severely punished? Yes, it was nearly torn apart in civil war.


Does anything deviate from the Babylonian model? Not one thing.
 
Upvote 0

gwynedd1

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2006
2,631
77
57
✟25,593.00
Faith
Christian
Let me know what I should look for?

So the first angel went and poured out his bowl (D)on the earth; and it became a loathsome and malignant (E)sore on the people (F)who had the mark of the beast and who worshiped his image.

Seeing as this has not happened yet and we must take Revelation absolutely literally how will I see the pimples on the earth?


Let me know when you see God walking around as well.

Micah 1

3For behold, the LORD is (H)coming forth from His place
He will come down and (I)tread on the high places of the earth.
4(J)The mountains will melt under Him
And the valleys will be split,​
 
Upvote 0

HisdaughterJen

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2007
16,026
446
this side of eternity
✟18,732.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hi HisdaughterJen,

I am curious how you arrive at that conclusion that this states the Beast is the Jews?

Because, Gwynedd1, it is the beast and his kingdom that fall under the various bowls of wrath, not the Jews as you have concluded in the op.


I will tell you plainly the beast is Rome and Jerusalem was the harlot.


That's not what you said in the op.


Did Rome and the harlot work together to persecute Christians? Yes.

Did Rome destroy the harlot? Yes.
Did God use pagan nations to judge Israel? Yes.
Was Rome severely punished? Yes, it was nearly torn apart in civil war.


Does anything deviate from the Babylonian model? Not one thing.


And what does Isaiah 47 say about who the proud queen/daughter of Babylon aka Mystery Babylon of Rev 17 and 18 is?
 
Upvote 0

gwynedd1

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2006
2,631
77
57
✟25,593.00
Faith
Christian
Because, Gwynedd1, it is the beast and his kingdom that fall under the various bowls of wrath, not the Jews as you have concluded in the op.
Hi HisdaughterJen,

Can you see why I might be confused?

Revelation 16
6for they poured out (N)the blood of saints and prophets, and You have given them (O)blood to drink. They deserve it."
Matthew 23
37"(AP)Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who (AQ)kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, (AR)the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling.​

That's not what you said in the op.

I said Revelation 16 was a judgment on Judea in the op. I have not changed the position.


And what does Isaiah 47 say about who the proud queen/daughter of Babylon aka Mystery Babylon of Rev 17 and 18 is?

We have been through this. Do you have any other evidence besides this? Lots of kingdoms where identified as female.

Ezekiel 30
"Indeed, those who support (F)Egypt will fall
And the pride of her power will come down;

Jerusalem was compared to a Harlot in Ezekiel 16.
 
Upvote 0

HisdaughterJen

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2007
16,026
446
this side of eternity
✟18,732.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hi HisdaughterJen,

Can you see why I might be confused?

Revelation 16
6for they poured out (N)the blood of saints and prophets, and You have given them (O)blood to drink. They deserve it."
Matthew 23
37"(AP)Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who (AQ)kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, (AR)the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling.
I said Revelation 16 was a judgment on Judea in the op. I have not changed the position.

I agree that Jerusalem was described in Matt 23 in the same way that Mystery babylon is described in Rev 17/18.

But Jerusalem got hers in 70 AD.

Rev 16 is describing the outpouring of the bowls of wrath on the earth and the the kingdom of the beast and it isn't Judea. That would make Judea the beast.

The kingdom of the beast is currently forming but hasn't formed yet....and won't until the beast/10 kings agree to give power to the beast.


We have been through this. Do you have any other evidence besides this? Lots of kingdoms where identified as female.

Ezekiel 30
"Indeed, those who support (F)Egypt will fall
And the pride of her power will come down;

Jerusalem was compared to a Harlot in Ezekiel 16.

No, it's not about being identified as female.

This kingdom is identified as a "daughter of the Babylonians" both here and in Zech 2.
What kingdom came after the Babylonians (hence, DAUGHTER of the Babylonians) in whose hand Israel was given?
It wasn't Egypt. It wasn't Assyria. It obviously wasn't Babylon. It was Rome.

Isa 47:5"Sit in silence, go into darkness, Daughter of the Babylonians; no more will you be called queen of kingdoms.

Isa 47:6I was angry with my people and desecrated my inheritance; I gave them into your hand, and you showed them no mercy. Even on the aged you laid a very heavy yoke.





Zec 2:6"Come! Come! Flee from the land of the north," declares the Lord, "for I have scattered you to the four winds of heaven," declares the Lord.

Zec 2:7"Come, O Zion! Escape, you who live in the Daughter of Babylon!"




These passages compare to Rev 17 & 18.
 
Upvote 0

gwynedd1

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2006
2,631
77
57
✟25,593.00
Faith
Christian
I agree that Jerusalem was described in Matt 23 in the same way that Mystery babylon is described in Rev 17/18.

But Jerusalem got hers in 70 AD.

Hi HisdaughterJen,


As you can see I believe Revelation describes this. John was the one Gospel that did not have an Olivet discourse and Revelation parallels those in the synoptic Gospels.

Rev 16 is describing the outpouring of the bowls of wrath on the earth and the the kingdom of the beast and it isn't Judea. That would make Judea the beast.

You will have to explain how this is the Beast receiving this judgment. It makes no sense for the Beast to suffer these judgments and then have within its power the means to destroy the harlot.


Revelation 17
16"And the (AW)ten horns which you saw, and the beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her (AX)desolate and (AY)naked, and will (AZ)eat her flesh and will (BA)burn her up with fire.
17"For (BB)God has put it in their hearts to execute His purpose by (BC)having a common purpose, and by giving their kingdom to the beast, until the (BD)words of God will be fulfilled.

The kingdom of the beast is currently forming but hasn't formed yet....and won't until the beast/10 kings agree to give power to the beast.


The ten kings were likely kings of the east that allied with Rome only for the siege of Jerusalem as indicated by Tacitus.


No, it's not about being identified as female.

This kingdom is identified as a "daughter of the Babylonians" both here and in Zech 2.
What kingdom came after the Babylonians (hence, DAUGHTER of the Babylonians) in whose hand Israel was given?
It wasn't Egypt. It wasn't Assyria. It obviously wasn't Babylon. It was Rome.

Isa 47:5"Sit in silence, go into darkness, Daughter of the Babylonians; no more will you be called queen of kingdoms.

Isa 47:6I was angry with my people and desecrated my inheritance; I gave them into your hand, and you showed them no mercy. Even on the aged you laid a very heavy yoke.


Zec 2:6"Come! Come! Flee from the land of the north," declares the Lord, "for I have scattered you to the four winds of heaven," declares the Lord.

Zec 2:7"Come, O Zion! Escape, you who live in the Daughter of Babylon!"




These passages compare to Rev 17 & 18.

The daughter of Babylon was what remained of Babylon after Persia(Isaiah 13:17-22). Zechariah was calling them from exile(Ezra, Nehemiah). Israel next fell under Greece, not Rome.
 
Upvote 0

HisdaughterJen

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2007
16,026
446
this side of eternity
✟18,732.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hi HisdaughterJen,


As you can see I believe Revelation describes this. John was the one Gospel that did not have an Olivet discourse and Revelation parallels those in the synoptic Gospels.



You will have to explain how this is the Beast receiving this judgment. It makes no sense for the Beast to suffer these judgments and then have within its power the means to destroy the harlot.

Because the beast/10 kings destroy the harlot before God destroys the beast/10 kings when Jesus physically comes.

Rev 17:12"The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast.
Rev 17:13They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast.
Rev 17:14They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings-and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers."
...

Rev 17:16The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire.
Rev 17:17For God has put it into their hearts to accomplish his purpose by agreeing to give the beast their power to rule, until God's words are fulfilled.


Revelation 17
16"And the (AW)ten horns which you saw, and the beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her (AX)desolate and (AY)naked, and will (AZ)eat her flesh and will (BA)burn her up with fire.
17"For (BB)God has put it in their hearts to execute His purpose by (BC)having a common purpose, and by giving their kingdom to the beast, until the (BD)words of God will be fulfilled.

The ten kings were likely kings of the east that allied with Rome only for the siege of Jerusalem as indicated by Tacitus.

I wouldn't know about that.

Revelation is pretty clear that the beast will be global and destroyed by Christ upon His physical return.



The daughter of Babylon was what remained of Babylon after Persia(Isaiah 13:17-22). Zechariah was calling them from exile(Ezra, Nehemiah). Israel next fell under Greece, not Rome.

No, it was Rome who sent them to the four winds, not Greece. Greece didn't tear down the temple and kill and scatter Israel to the four winds.

Remember, the daughter of Babylon is an entity who did the same things as Babylon. It's not Greece, it's Rome.
 
Upvote 0

gwynedd1

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2006
2,631
77
57
✟25,593.00
Faith
Christian
Because the beast/10 kings destroy the harlot before God destroys the beast/10 kings when Jesus physically comes.

Hi HisdaughterJen,

There is nothing to indicate that the bowl judgments have anything to do with judgment on the Beast. Yet there is clearly one for Judea.

.

I wouldn't know about that.

Revelation is pretty clear that the beast will be global and destroyed by Christ upon His physical return.

Its not clear to me its a global even because again the Olivet discourses in the Gospels all localize this to Judea. There is nothing indicating global accept for the nations of which Rome approximates quite well in a vision. I cannot think of a power that represents all the nations better to this day.



No, it was Rome who sent them to the four winds, not Greece. Greece didn't tear down the temple and kill and scatter Israel to the four winds.

Remember, the daughter of Babylon is an entity who did the same things as Babylon. It's not Greece, it's Rome.

The chapter you quote from speaks of Babylon. At the time of Isaiah's writing Babylon had not fallen. I can't think of anything more speculative then assuming Rome is the daughter of Babylon.
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
Revelation 16:2 refers to literal sores which will
come upon the people who will have received the mark
of the Antichrist and worshipped his image
(cf. Revelation 13:14b-18).

---

In its context, Micah 1:3-4 could refer symbolically
to God bringing about the destruction of sinful
Samaria (Micah 1:5-6), the northern kingdom of Israel,
back in 722 BC.

By itself, Micah 1:3-4 is similar to Zechariah 14:3-5,
which shows Jesus literally landing on the Mount of
Olives (cf. Acts 1:11-12) and splitting it in two at
his second coming, not to bring destruction, but to
provide a way of escape for the Jews in Jerusalem from
the battle which will be going on there between the
nations of the world and the returned Jesus (Zechariah
14:2-3, cf. Revelation 19:19-21), before he restores
Jerusalem and sets up his millennial kingdom on the
earth (Zechariah 14:8-21, Micah 4:1-4).

---

Revelation 16:6 is referring to those people of all
nations who will hate and kill Christians during the
coming tribulation (Matthew 24:9), especially during
the 42-month Luciferian world-reign of the Antichrist
(Revelation 13:4-10, 14:12-13, 20:4).

After the legal end of the Antichrist's 42-month
reign (Revelation 11:15), God will literally turn the
rivers and springs of the earth to blood as a
punishment for these killings (Revelation 16:4-7, cf.
6:9-11).

---

The kingdom of the beast (the Antichrist) will receive
the vial judgments of Revelation 16, for the first
vial judgment will be specifically against those who
will have "the mark of the beast, and upon them which
worshipped his image" (Revelation 16:2), and the fifth
vial judgment will be specifically against "the seat
of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness"
(Revelation 16:10).

It does make sense for the beast (the Antichrist and
his kingdom) to suffer the first five vial judgments
and still have within its power the means to destroy
the harlot of Babylon (Revelation 17:16), for her
destruction will come in the seventh vial judgment
from God (Revelation 16:19), and God will have gotten
the ten kings of the Antichrist to do God's will
(Revelation 17:17).

The harlot of Babylon represents mankind's corrupt
civilization. That's why when she is destroyed no one
on the earth will buy merchandise from the merchants
(Revelation 18:11), and why she is responsible for
all the killings of Christians throughout the earth
(Revelation 18:24), and why she symbolically reigns
over all the kings of the earth (Revelation 17:18),
and why her destruction will be at the same time that
the cities of the nations fall (Revelation 16:19).

So when the ten kings of the Antichrist will destroy
the harlot of Babylon, they will be destroying the
cities of the nations at the behest of Satan himself
(Isaiah 14:17,12), who, knowing his defeat is about to
come (Revelation 20:1-3) at the second coming
(Revelation 19:11-20:3) which will immediately follow
the seventh vial judgment, will resort to a literal
"scorched earth" tactic: he will want to leave nothing
for Jesus to rule over during the millennium but ruins,
smoking piles of rubble strewn across the globe.

But this will be no loss for Jesus, for the
destruction of civilization will have been a judgment
from him (Zephaniah 3:6), simply performed by Satan
through the ten kings of the Antichrist (Revelation
17:16-17). And after his second comong, Jesus will
be able to restore the earth and create a paradisiacal
civilization on it during the millennium (Isaiah 51:3,
Ezekiel 36:35).

But if Jesus' motive for the destruction of
civilization will be judgment, and Satan's motive for
the destruction of civilization will be spite, what
could possibly be the motive for the ten kings of
the Antichrist to destroy civilization? They could be
deceived by Satan (Lucifer) into thinking that they
won't need the earth anymore after the great battle
at the second coming (Revelation 16:14-16, 19:19-21),
that they will be victorious over YHWH and so be able
to ascend back into the Pleroma, the heavenly paradise
of gnosticism. For gnosticism will be part of the
Luciferian doctrine of the Antichrist (1 John 4:3,
Revelation 13:4), and it teaches that YHWH is an evil
god who created the earth and the material universe
and entrapped the spirits of people within it when
they by some mishap fell out of the Pleroma.

The Antichrist will utterly revile YHWH (Revelation
13:6, Daniel 11:36) and could utterly revile YHWH's
creation the earth and the entire material universe
as (what he could call) "a foul prisonhouse for our
divine spirits, which belong in the Pleroma where they
lived for eternity in bliss before the Fall happened".
And so when the Antichrist takes over the whole earth
by the power of Lucifer (Revelation 13:4-8), he could
turn the "prisonhouse" earth into (what he could call)
an "armed base of rebellion against YHWH, so that when
he comes to quell our rebellion we can rise up as one
and overpower him once and for all, and finally escape
back to our true home".

So the ten kings of the Antichrist, as they are
destroying the cities of the earth in anticipation of
the great battle at YHWH's arrival, could see it as
simply destroying a foul prison which they will soon
be able to flee out from.

And how could they destroy the cities of the earth,
the harlot Babylon? (Revelation 16:19). They will "burn
her with fire" (Revelation 17:16). They could use the
still-vast arsenals of nuclear weapons stored by the
U.S. and Russia to utterly consume the cities of the
earth with nuclear fire. Or they could use nuclear
bombs made during the reign of the Antichrist. There
is a very powerful type of nuclear bomb call an "FFF"
bomb (Fission-Fusion-Fission) which has already been
developed and which took be taken up by the Antichrist
as "his" bomb, for "FFF" ends up being the same as
"666", when the letter "F" is converted into its
gematrial numerical value of "6". And "666" is the
gematrial number of the name of the Antichrist himself
(Revelation 13:17b-18).
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.