Hi, Vy
Bland, I've always seen AQ claim these quickly if they are associated.
To my understanding, they never claimed 9/11, nor the previous attempt on the WTC. You might very well know something I don't, though. In attacks on Israelis, the various Palestinian groups generally vie for the "honor" of guilt; and many times they are proved bogus. Al Qaeda isn't like them, though: The Pals try as much as possible to portray themselves as a local "liberation" group, whereas Al Qaeda is trying to portray itself as the voice of Islam worldwide -- it enhances their image.
While I still think a middle eastern tie is the most likely, bear in mind this isn't the first time we've had domestic terrorists. We've had some very high profile right wing terrorists (McVeigh for example)
Not a good example. McVeigh was incensed over a single issue: The injustice of the audacious slaughter of women and children by federal agents at Waco -- agents directed from the Oklahoma City office. He did not have any larger agenda, so far as I know; and I read here and there that even he had somehow linked up with foreign contacts with M.E. connections.
and some from the left as well (the failed bridge bombers that attended an occupy rally).
I never read about that one. The word "failed" might indicate lack of coordination with a larger group.
The poor execution and power of the bombs points to someone new or very hastily throwing bombs together, yet the plan itself seemed well organized. That seems to indicate to me a small cell or group that are not professionals. This means either a middle eastern cell that was thrown together in relative haste, or a group of amateurs from here at home. Many here will come up with grand plans but fail in the execution.
I haven't seen many details on the nature of the bombs yet. Al Qaeda is not an organization like U.N.C.L.E. or CHAOS. They are connected by deeply-held Salafist convictions, more than anything else. In some cases (Don't ask for citations, because I can't remember them), they simply funded and otherwise helped sympathetic groups. The case of the "shoe bomber" comes to mind:
"Born to a father who was a career criminal, Reid converted to Islam as a young man in prison after years as a petty criminal. Later he became radicalized and went to Pakistan and Afghanistan, where he trained and became a member of
al-Qaeda...
"He spent 1999 and 2000 in Pakistan and trained at a terrorist camp in Afghanistan, according to several informants...
"Reid and
Saajid Badat, another British man preparing as a terrorist, returned to Pakistan in November 2001, and reportedly travelled overland to Afghanistan. They were given "shoe bombs", casual footwear adapted to be covertly smuggled onto aircraft before being used to destroy them. Later
forensic analysis of both bombs showed that they contained the same
plastic explosive and that the respective lengths of
detonator cord had come from the same batch: the cut mark on Badat's cord exactly matches that on Reid's..."
--
Richard Reid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That article describes Reid as a "member" of Al Qaeda; but his only connections with them were: (1) attendance at a training camp, (2) indoctrination, and (3) a pair of shoes and a mission. It is doubtful that he knew any of the "heavies" in the organization, or that he took part in any strategic planning meetings. He was a poorly-trained, highly expendible patsy on a long-shot mission.
The bomber cell in Boston (I assume more than one were involved) may not have been any more "connected" than Riuchard Reid; and they were very successful in their mission -- especially if their mission had the message I suspect it had. Try this out for size:
1. Last month, Obama made a visit to Israel (and side trips to Ramallah and Amman, which, in Al Qaeda eyes, are the same as Israel), and cozied up to "the enemy". Message of this blast? DON'T GET COZY WITH THEM. The April 15 date, Israeli Independence Day, would be enough to get that message across.
2. John Kerry is Obama's point man in re-starting the "Middle East Peace Process". The probable message? DON'T GET TOO SERIOUS ABOUT "PEACE". WE KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE.
Thing is we don't know yet. We can only speculate until more details come out.
Police work is all about speculation. It's up to the courts, to decide the facts.
Thanks for the serious conversation.
Shalom shalom
