• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟240,710.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I can envisage experiments that would convince a blind person that there is such a thing as vision - proof that some people, "the sighted" can gather correct information from the environment without using touch, smell, taste or hearing.

Is there any comparable way of convincing a "spiritually blind" person of the existence of a spiritual dimension?
If there were such a place as the spiritual dimension, I believe it would be possible. That’s why most of those who claim knowledge of the spiritual dimension, cannot agree on what this spiritual dimension really is; what they believe varies from religion to religion. That would be like sighted people who cannot agree on what they are looking at in the physical world trying to explain to the blind what they see

K
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟190,302.00
Faith
Seeker
I had a friend that was blind. There is quite a bit they can do for themselves, still you have to do a lot for them to take care of them.
Not sure how that´s taking away from what I said.
Anyway:
1. If the criterium is *needing others to take care of them* we are all handicapped.
2. I´d argue that most of the problems that blind persons are facing are due to the fact that they live in a society that´s designed by seeing persons for seeing persons.

But, just so not to derail the thread, what does that mean for the OP question?
Is the assistence we can give to blind persons depending on their concession that there is vision?
And why is it that blind people usually are ready to accept that others can see, while the "spiritually blind" aren´t? Arguably the reason is that blind persons notice that their condition comes with problems that those who claim that they have vision can solve better than them, while the "spiritually seeing" simply claim that the "spiritually blind" have problems. Furthermore, the help which the "spiritually seeing" can offer to the "spiritually blind" seems to be restricted to telling them that they are blind.

ETA:
Besides, it is quite easy for a seeing person to demonstrate to a blind person that he has an ability the blind person doesn´t have. Interestingly, this seems impossible when it comes to "spiritual vision".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Freodin
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟200,004.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Because science still ignores 99% of the universe (plasma) and instead has chosen to believe that 96% of it is Fairie Dust. If I ignored carbon while trying to describe a diamond I am sure I would need all sorts of Fairie Dust in my attempt to explain it.
 
Upvote 0

BarryDesborough

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,150
17
France
✟1,473.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Because science still ignores 99% of the universe (plasma) and instead has chosen to believe that 96% of it is Fairie Dust. If I ignored carbon while trying to describe a diamond I am sure I would need all sorts of Fairie Dust in my attempt to explain it.
It is clear that the spiritual dimension is not real in the same sense that light and vision are real. Light and vision is easily provable to a blind person, but the spiritual dimension is not provable to someone who does not perceive it.
 
Upvote 0

Coelo

Newbie
Jun 8, 2013
462
7
✟663.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Private
1. If the criterium is *needing others to take care of them* we are all handicapped.
In the real world you are not taking care of yourself if you have to collect a disability check. I do know of one blind person that had a sort of job at McDonalds but it was really very part time and they still leaned heavy on tax payers to support them. Perhaps someone like Stevie Wonder can make enough money to support himself. But he still needs people to take care of him. Another blind person I know was going to the university and trying to get a degree. That is still a long way off from getting a job and supporting himself. If you can afford to pay people to take care of you, then that is different from not being able to pay people to take care of you. The concept of the butcher, the baker & the candlestick maker is not a group of handicapped people. It is a community working together. Each doing what they are best at and trading with others.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
31,360
15,802
Seattle
✟1,288,268.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
And if the other person could neither see, feel, taste, or hear your evidence? Please, convince me that space which is composed of nothing is not only bent, but expanding at an accelerating rate? Are you asking me to believe that something bends nothing, then nothing tells that something what direction to take?


No, that is not the topic of this thread. I would ask that you stop trying to derail it. Now, can you tell us how you would provide evidence to someone who is spiritually blind or no?
 
Upvote 0

Coelo

Newbie
Jun 8, 2013
462
7
✟663.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Private
It is clear that the spiritual dimension is not real in the same sense that light and vision are real.
Yet we read that we are to walk in the light and that "God is light and in Him is no darkness". So even though we talk about a spiritual dimension we talk about light and darkness. Yet sometimes blind people can see a little bit. Just as perhaps people are not in total darkness in a spiritual sense.
 
Upvote 0

BarryDesborough

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,150
17
France
✟1,473.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Yet we read that we are to walk in the light and that "God is light and in Him is no darkness". So even though we talk about a spiritual dimension we talk about light and darkness. Yet sometimes blind people can see a little bit. Just as perhaps people are not in total darkness in a spiritual sense.
Way to miss the point. We can demonstrate to a blind person that light and vision exist. We cannot perform a comparable demonstration of the existence of the spiritual.

My implied point is that it is meaningless to call someone "spiritually blind".
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Yet we read that we are to walk in the light and that "God is light and in Him is no darkness". So even though we talk about a spiritual dimension we talk about light and darkness.

The problem is that it is all talk. When it comes down to demonstrating these claims we are left with nothing.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Way to miss the point. We can demonstrate to a blind person that light and vision exist. We cannot perform a comparable demonstration of the existence of the spiritual.

Actually....
Phillips Brooks and Helen Keller

In one of her letters, Helen told Bishop Brooks that she had always known about God, even before she had any words. Even before she could call God anything, she knew God was there. She didn't know what it was. God had no name for her -- nothing had a name for her. She had no concept of a name. But in her darkness and isolation, she knew she was not alone. Someone was with her. She felt God's love. And when she received the gift of language and heard about God, she said she already knew.
My implied point is that it is meaningless to call someone "spiritually blind".
Whereas Helen Keller may have been physically blind, she was never "spiritually blind".
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟190,302.00
Faith
Seeker
In the real world you are not taking care of yourself if you have to collect a disability check. I do know of one blind person that had a sort of job at McDonalds but it was really very part time and they still leaned heavy on tax payers to support them. Perhaps someone like Stevie Wonder can make enough money to support himself. But he still needs people to take care of him. Another blind person I know was going to the university and trying to get a degree. That is still a long way off from getting a job and supporting himself. If you can afford to pay people to take care of you, then that is different from not being able to pay people to take care of you. The concept of the butcher, the baker & the candlestick maker is not a group of handicapped people. It is a community working together. Each doing what they are best at and trading with others.
What do you want from me?
Why do you take the least relevant part of my post in regards to the thread topic, and start a semantics fight?
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Indeed, oh the irony. You are given mountains of evidence and you run away from it.

You handed me mountains of supernatural sky math, and not a single spec of actual controlled empirical evidence to support any of it.
 
Upvote 0

Coelo

Newbie
Jun 8, 2013
462
7
✟663.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Private
The problem is that it is all talk. When it comes down to demonstrating these claims we are left with nothing.
Jesus says: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." It is up to you to ask, seek and knock. If your not asking, seeking and knocking, then do not be surprised if it is not open to you. As you admit your full of talk but when it comes to a demonstration your show up with nothing. You have only judged yourself. You have once again proven the Bible to be true.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Jesus says: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." It is up to you to ask, seek and knock. If your not asking, seeking and knocking, then do not be surprised if it is not open to you.

I did that for the first 22 years of my life. I found nothing.

You claim to have found it. So show us.
 
Upvote 0