• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Mumei

Senior Member
May 26, 2007
840
94
39
Indianapolis
✟24,194.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Mumei,

I just finished reading that article you posted about anal sex. Specifically, the article indicates numerous injuries, diseases, and infections homosexuals recieve due to anal sex. After several lengthy and medically detailed paragraphs, which appear to me to be nothing more than a thinly veiled gay-bashing article, the author then goes on to say
"Consensual penile-anal intercourse can be performed safely provided there is adequate lubrication. Few anorectal problems and no evidence of anal-sphincter dysfunction are found in heterosexual women who have anal-receptive intercourse."

Does anyone take this guy seriously? I lol'ed irl @ this article. It's a shame that people can't read between the lines when it comes to crap like this.
Yes, I pointed that out. Jim Burroway at BTB went and researched the sources used for that paper. It's pretty bad. He used Agnew's paper which talked about the insertion of foreign objects (e.g. not penile-anal intercourse, but other foreign objects) to suggest that this has to do with homosexuals. Another study he cited said that STD's are "strongly correlated to sexual lifestyle," and presented statistics. He neglected to mention that they were for a single STD clinic from male patients in Copenhagen, over a seven month period. Only 365 patients were covered. By the most conservative estimates, there are 3 million gays and lesbians in the United States, and by the more reasonable ones, there are 12 million to 18 million. I somehow doubt 365 patients from a single town from a single STD clinic in Denmark are representative of homosexuals, especially when there is no reason to believe that all of these men were, in fact, homosexuals. When he talks about the "trauma" that can result from anal-penile sex, he draws from resources that talk about sexual assault, not sex. What's more, he's often talking about heterosexual injuries, but pretending that the papers that he references are exclusively dealing with homosexuals.

He also had a paper referenced in his bibliography about "Delayed death from 'fisting'." It would have been nice if we had been told that that particular case was from a heterosexual woman dying after engaging in the practice with her husband.

Absolutely amazing.
 
Upvote 0