• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

catlover

Guest


The purpose of marriage is a partnership between a man and a woman. I have to disagree with the idea that marriage is only fo rthe purpose of having children...elderly people marry after the death of a spouse. Obviuosly they cannot have children.
 
Upvote 0

Lotar

Swift Eagle Justice
Feb 27, 2003
8,163
445
44
Southern California
✟27,144.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
The purpose of marriage is a partnership between a man and a woman. I have to disagree with the idea that marriage is only fo rthe purpose of having children...elderly people marry after the death of a spouse. Obviuosly they cannot have children.
I never said the only purpose for marriage was to have children. To be accurate, I never even mentioned children in my explaination of the purpose of marriage.

Marriage is not a partnership, it is a union where two become one.
 
Upvote 0

rainbowbright

Veteran
Sep 4, 2005
1,456
95
46
exactly opposite of where I'd rather be
✟24,548.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Excuse me, but WHO here ever said this? Could you please quote whoever it was instead of generalizing?
what I meant by this, is people are trying to to mold the Bible to fit modern secular society. i can't go back and figure out who said this because it seems that almost everyone here agrees so there is not just one inparticular person.
To repeat to what Lotar and Twincrier (who seems to have a very Orthodox view on this) have been saying, if you don't want to take responsibility of being a parent, then don't have sex.
 
Reactions: TwinCrier
Upvote 0
W

WalkingforHim

Guest
I believe the pill was created so people could have sex outside of marriage and not get pregnant.

It certainly helps those who do that do it without getting pregnant. Now personally, I don't see non-married people taking precautions against out of wedlock births to be a bad thing. We don't need more single parents, and there are currently more kids in orphanges now than will ever be adopted, so we don't need any more kids being given up for adoption.

Though they are plenty of married people who use BC as well. And many women take the pill for hormonal reasons completely seperated from sex.
 
Upvote 0

Ino

Regular Member
Nov 25, 2006
268
22
Oxford
✟23,024.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Well that quote certainly explains an opinion or two.
 
Upvote 0

elsbeth

Out of my mind...back in 5 Minutes.
Oct 26, 2006
922
68
AZ
Visit site
✟23,929.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Tough subject. On one hand, women have been giving birth without birth control for thousands of years and never felt like slaves; in fact, many women wish they could get pregnant (hopefully they are married women).
C'mon! I'm sure in the "thousands of years" you mention that MANY women felt basically like slaves- either to their families or to their biology or both. One of my Grandmothers had 9 children, my mother-in-law had 6. They weren't the happiest women I've known. Women used to wear out early because of a pregnancy all the time. They died in childbirth more too. Too many pregnancies too close isn't healthy.
I got married late- had 2 kids in 3 yrs with the last one at 38. I was worn out physically (2 C-sections besides the pregnancies) and I just didn't want any more children. We would have had a tremendously hard time financially with the cost of the doctors and hospital to have another. My husband had a vasectomy THANK THE LORD.
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
69
✟279,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe the pill was created so people could have sex outside of marriage and not get pregnant.

...uhmmm also so people who ARE married can have sex and not get pregnant.
tulc(not having more kids, concentrating on grandkids now!)
 
Upvote 0

TwinCrier

Double Blessed and spreading the gospel
Oct 11, 2002
6,069
617
55
Indiana
Visit site
✟32,278.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
...Oh, I trust God to decide when I have offspring, just like I trust God to decide when I contract the flu. That doesn't prevent me from getting vaccinated, though....

This is always brought up regarding bc. Do we leave everything else in God's hands? I don't think so. Do we take antibiotics and other medicines? Do we get flu shots and other vaccinations? Get mammograms? X-rays? Cat scans?...
You arfalling into the world's way of thinking that pregnancy is some medical problem or disease (unless you planned and wanted it of course) instead of the normal, natural funtion of the body. Reproduction isn't an illness that must be separated for sexual relations. I actually heard someone say on on of those talk shows that there are two kinds of sex, love making and baby making. What a terrible way to disect it.
 
Upvote 0
C

catlover

Guest

Getting pregnant over and over again, IS dangerous to a woman's body.

Childbirth is not without risk either...also some women experience permanent incontinence after the birth of a child and the inability to control their bowels.



http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/baby-bladder-bowels.php#e

http://www.prevention.com/article/0,5778,s1-1-93-178-2738-1,00.html
So for you to claim reproduction is harmless without any risk is false.
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
69
✟279,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Reproduction isn't an illness that must be separated for sexual relations.

Nor is it a consequence of sexual relations any more. Why should that be considered a sin?
tulc(was told he isn't REALLY pro-life because he believes in BC)
 
Upvote 0

TwinCrier

Double Blessed and spreading the gospel
Oct 11, 2002
6,069
617
55
Indiana
Visit site
✟32,278.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That's fantastic.

You're right, God will not force His blessings on us, even though He know what is best where as we don't. We have a free will to chose the second best. Or even the worst. There are commands to "be fruitful and multiply" and I know many see that as directed to someone besides them, but that fact remains, throughout the bible it is all pro-procreation, not pro sterility and barrenness.

 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.