Hi there,
I just wanted to qualify against wisdom established by the difficulty of making oaths for nothing (in Proverbs specified as related to honour) that bipolar - which as yet remains completely and entirely ambiguous to me (regardless of otherwise, being anything) is as I understood it: without a baseline, remaining permanently unstable.
This is assumed to be in contradiction to the notion that a formula can be arrived at for equilibrium of a double pendulum (evolutionarily) - in my estimation at least minimally related to emotional configuration of the mind - as though nothing more than a physical artifact that is or is not contextualized in a neutral context (as only such regardless of time).
That being the case, the baseline of all time being absent neutrally, and as at least partially related to bipolar defined as structured tissue - can only mean that over time more context is lost than not... regardless of how structured or produced.
Stability therefore (as was thought wise) necessarily (inversely) implies some risk of bipolar stress.
I just wanted to qualify against wisdom established by the difficulty of making oaths for nothing (in Proverbs specified as related to honour) that bipolar - which as yet remains completely and entirely ambiguous to me (regardless of otherwise, being anything) is as I understood it: without a baseline, remaining permanently unstable.
This is assumed to be in contradiction to the notion that a formula can be arrived at for equilibrium of a double pendulum (evolutionarily) - in my estimation at least minimally related to emotional configuration of the mind - as though nothing more than a physical artifact that is or is not contextualized in a neutral context (as only such regardless of time).
That being the case, the baseline of all time being absent neutrally, and as at least partially related to bipolar defined as structured tissue - can only mean that over time more context is lost than not... regardless of how structured or produced.
Stability therefore (as was thought wise) necessarily (inversely) implies some risk of bipolar stress.
