Big Bang pwns Evolution

[AV1611VET]

Think about it.

Since evolution is rife with holes (missing links), then as the universe expands, those holes get bigger and bigger, and kinds (genera) grow farther and farther apart.

It's basic physics.

 

[Occams Barber]

Think about it.

Since evolution is rife with holes (missing links), then as the universe expands, those holes get bigger and bigger, and kinds (genera) grow farther and farther apart.

It's basic physics.

I think you're on to something here. I can already see the Evolutionists running for their foxholes to escape your intellectual barrage.

We could call it the Swiss Cheese Theory of Universal Expansion.
OB

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Big Bang pwns Evolution

That reminds of one of my usernames I used back in the days of online gaming "I PWNS U" ehehe....
"Diablo", "Team Fortress Classic", "Starcraft" etc

TFC [early 2000]was my all time favorite......just go in and frag, frag and more frag....

 

[The Barbarian]

Think about it.

Since evolution is rife with holes (missing links)

let's test you belief. Name me any two major groups, said to be evolutionarily connect, that lack a transitional form between them.

What do you have?

 

[AV1611VET]

TFC [early 2000]was my all time favorite......just go in and frag, frag and more frag....

Looks like the Desert Storm equivalent of DOOM.

 

[expos4ever]

You know, they can do wonderful things with psychotropics these days

 

[AV1611VET]

let's test you belief. Name me any two major groups, said to be evolutionarily connect, that lack a transitional form between them.

What do you have?

Well, let's go with Australopithecus afarensis → Homo habilis.

(I can't believe I'm getting sucked into this. Don't argue evolution with an evolutionist folks, or he'll drag you down to his level and beat you to death with experience. But I'll bite. )

 

[AV1611VET]

You know, they can do wonderful things with psychotropics these days

I've been to the Psycho Tropics!

Great place to visit; but I wouldn't want to live there!

 

[The Barbarian]

Well, let's go with Australopithecus afarensis → Homo habilis.

so you're going with individual species instead of major groups. Well, that's not a new tactic. But even there...

This temporal interval reaches forward in time from the latest known occurrences of ‘generalized’ Australopithecus species (A. afarensis in eastern Africa, A. africanus in southern Africa) to the earliest known records of two, perhaps three, species commonly attributed to the genus Homo (H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. erectus). Between them lies a million years of rare, isolated or fragmentary fossils that constitute the hard evidence for the origin of Homo. That this time period also contains some of the earliest undisputed evidence for stone-tool manufacture is of no small consequence for scenarios about the origin of characteristics thought to be critical human adaptations, including proclivities for meat consumption, hunting, mobility, cooking, prosocial behaviour, etc., usually in novel ‘open’ habitats of the Early Pleistocene
http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/371/1698/20150248

Australopithecus garhi is rather like the earlier Australopithecus afarensis, but the humoral/femoral ratio is like that of H. habilis, rather than A. afarensis.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/284/5414/629

(I can't believe I'm getting sucked into this.

Most creationists are too cautious to get pulled into a discussion of the evidence. Would you like to see how early Homo and late australopithecines show transitional changes?

Don't argue evolution with an evolutionist folks, or he'll drag you down to his level

That is, down to discussing the evidence. Scientists will get you every time.

 

[AV1611VET]

*

What?

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Well, let's go with Australopithecus afarensis → Homo habilis.

(I can't believe I'm getting sucked into this. Don't argue evolution with an evolutionist folks, or he'll drag you down to his level and beat you to death with experience. But I'll bite. )

Nah, you got it backwards...yer on their home turf here.... they're trying to drag you UP to their level, science or no science

 

[Tom 1]

I think you're on to something here. I can already see the Evolutionists running for their foxholes to escape your intellectual barrage.

We could call it the Swiss Cheese Theory of Universal Expansion.
OB

Actually it's called the 'Rab C Nesbitt syndrome'. It starts with buying a string vest, then wearing it for several decades while you gradually put on weight.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Think about it.

Since evolution is rife with holes (missing links), then as the universe expands, those holes get bigger and bigger, and kinds (genera) grow farther and farther apart.

It's basic physics.

Speaking of holes, this kewl movie commented on my avatar

"Every time I see one of those, I expect to spot some guy in red with horns and a pitchfork"

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078869/
1979
Storyline
An Earth exploratory ship, the USS Palomino, discovers a black hole with a lost ship, the USS Cygnus, just outside its event horizon.
Deciding to solve the mystery of the Cygnus are: the Palomino's Captain, Dan Holland; his First Officer, Lieutenant Charlie Pizer; journalist Harry Booth; scientist and ESP-sensitive Dr. Kate McCrae, whose father was the Cygnus's First Officer; Dr. Alex Durant, the expedition's civilian leader; and the robot known as V.I.N.CENT. The Palomino attempts a dangerous fly-by of the darkened ship.

 

[AV1611VET]

Speaking of holes, this kewl movie commented on my avatar

Looks like I'm gonna have to check that movie out!

 

[The Barbarian]

Well, that didn't take long.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Looks like I'm gonna have to check that movie out!

I saw it when it came out on the big screen.
The soundtrack is especially awesome, and the special effects for that period of time [1979] are fairly good. The actors were, imho, very good....

 

[Justatruthseeker]

let's test you belief. Name me any two major groups, said to be evolutionarily connect, that lack a transitional form between them.

What do you have?

Every single one on every single tree that are connected with “missing” common ancestors, I.e every single one....

 

[The Barbarian]

Barbarian suggests;
Let's test youR belief. Name me any two major groups, said to be evolutionarily connect, that lack a transitional form between them.

What do you have?

Every single one on every single tree that are connected with “missing” common ancestors, I.e every single one....

You can't find even one? No one else can, either. Notice someone tried to do a switch and go from "major group" to "species", and there still was one. Turns out, there's a transitional from A. afarensis to H. habilis.

If you want to try, by all means, do. But be honest with yourself.

 

[AV1611VET]

You can't find even one? No one else can, either. Notice someone tried to do a switch and go from "major group" to "species", and there still was one. Turns out, there's a transitional from A. afarensis to H. habilis.

Um ... you wanted two major groups ... I gave you two major groups:

Australopithecus and Homo are two different genuses, with more missing links between them than I have posts.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Um ... you wanted two major groups ... I gave you two major groups:

Australopithecus and Homo are two different genuses, with more missing links between them than I have posts.

Don't ask - don't tell.......
R.I.P. John Candy......

Francis/Psycho: "Also, I don't like anyone touching me. Now if any of you homos touch me, I'll kill ya"