Big Bang proved God?

[HitchSlap]

Destroy this Dr. Carroll:

any proof is not the proof to Trump or Putin, but proof to God of Theism (because He is Verity). Therefore, the God of Theism must be proven to the God of Theism.

I have no idea what your point is.

 

[HitchSlap]

Posting media with banned CF words might get you a warning.
FYI

 

[Tinker Grey]

Dr. Carroll smashes WLC on Kalaam/TAG

Skip to 12:20

One of my favorites.

 

[joinfree]

Dr. Carroll smashes WLC on Kalaam/TAG

Skip to 12:20

Looking more closely at Dr. Carroll no-boundary model, one sees the violation of the invariance of the Standard Instruments of Metrology. Namely, the clocks in Big Bang are not working standart-ly, they are ruined. Therefore, there must be God of Theism. Look: the Big Bang in no-boundary proposal remains a special place. There are no specials in Nature.

 

[joinfree]

Posting media with banned CF words might get you a warning.
FYI

But God loves this joke.

 

[HitchSlap]

But God loves this joke.

You make god cry.

 

[joinfree]

I have no idea what your point is.

How can we tell, that a proof is true or false? To ask God of Theism in prayer.
Therefore, the proofs and God are not separated. The God is proven.

 

[bhsmte]

How can we tell, that a proof is true or false? To ask God of Theism in prayer.
Therefore, the proofs and God are not separated. The God is proven.

In your mind sure. Beyond that, good luck.

 

[joinfree]

In your mind sure. Beyond that, good luck.

The God is proven, therefore, He is outside the mind too.

 

[bhsmte]

The God is proven, therefore, He is outside the mind too.

Opinion. A comforting one I am sure, but opinion.

 

[joinfree]

Opinion. A comforting one I am sure, but opinion.

Any opinion is nonsense in atheism. We just have two different Gods: idol of atheism, and the God of Theism. There is sense in Theism, there is nonsense in Atheism.

 

[bhsmte]

Any opinion is nonsense in atheism. We just have two different Gods.

What God?

 

[joinfree]

What God?

All words are nonsense in atheism. Just the idol of atheism is the god of nonsense.

 

[durangodawood]

Weak humor.

But it does point out the main problem with the kalam argument: the claims that underlie the main premises are made in appalling ignorance.

 

[HitchSlap]

How can we tell, that a proof is true or false? To ask God of Theism in prayer.
Therefore, the proofs and God are not separated. The God is proven.

Yeah... this didn't help.

 

[bhsmte]

All words are nonsense in atheism. Just the idol of atheism is the god of nonsense.

I'm quite sure you need to believe that, but what God?

 

[Speedwell]

Hmm although I find the OPs comments to be non-sequiturs, but you seem to be creating a false dichotomy between rationality and faith.

You seem to be creating a false dichotomy between belief in your theology and fideism.

 

[RevCharlesG]

Whatever works for you.

when bringing up "truth" you have to be clear. is truth relative or absolute????

 

[joinfree]

Yeah... this didn't help.

1) write 100 times on the blackboard "God of Theism exists." By this way you get the energy and momentum to go through the proof of God:
A) God is omniscient, so He is the perfect specialist to ask His opinion. His opinion is always true and right.
B) Ask Him, does He exist or not. He will certainly answer "Yes, the God of Theism is existent." Proof ends.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Looking more closely at Dr. Carroll no-boundary model, one sees the violation of the invariance of the Standard Instruments of Metrology. Namely, the clocks in Big Bang are not working standart-ly, they are ruined. Therefore, there must be God of Theism. Look: the Big Bang in no-boundary proposal remains a special place. There are no specials in Nature.

Gibberish, I'm afraid. The 'Standard Instruments of Metrology' (e.g. clocks, rulers) are not universally invariant even under Special Relativity. But whether they are invariant or not says nothing about a god or gods.