Biblical impossibility of evolution

[dad]

Dad, When do you think the present day science became the present day science? a thousand years ago or
10 thousands years ago? or perhaps even a million? any ideas?

I think it was around 4400 years ago. A little over a century after the flood.

 

[dad]

OK, so you acknowledge that you are on the anti knowledge, darkness and lie side of the equation... got it!

No. But I am on one side.

No dad, in science we don't "prove" anything. Since you, on the other hand, are in the "Prove" business, why don't you prove that the future and past exist/ed different? I already know the answer, as we all do... You Can't. All you can do is scoff at your betters.

I am in the trust God business. And I don't even do well at that. But when so called science spouts off claims that fly in the face directly to what God revealed to man, I have enough backbone and intelligence to ask for real solid evidence. They have failed. It is certain that they are dark deceivers now.

Imagine a lot of money wasted on nothing. Imagine, instead what could be accomplished if you creationists used yoru efforts to do some good in the world..like clothing, sheltering and feeding the poor. Just imagine what could be accomplished?

Imagine setting the captives free. God is in the 'let my people go' business you know, careful.

HAHAHAHAHAA! No, dad... no one ever challenges you on anything in this forum... do they?? You must me having short term memory problems. Or maybe because you have declared yourself to be "Undefeated," you have deluded yourself into believing you aren't even challenged on your broken science/ theology... Ever wonder why someone would even use "Undefeated" as a tagline under their name in the first place? Overcompensating for something, perhaps? Or maybe this is the only way you can convince yourself you are indeed never wrong?

Seems you are obsessed with a lighthearted little comment tag. Strange. Maybe because it is absolutely true, that even a little word can so disturb you.

There is no proof or evidence of what forces and laws existed in our past. That basic fact kills science's ability to support ANY claim they make that deals in the far past.

No denying that. No escaping it. A bit like a division of German tanks in the dessert, cut off on all sides. No escape. No ammo. All that remains is to wait em out, and laugh when the inevitable white flag comes.

 

[Split Rock]

I am in the trust God business. And I don't even do well at that.

Well, dad... this is the second time recently that I have to agree with you on something! A new record?

But when so called science spouts off claims that fly in the face directly to what God revealed to man,

I think you mean "what God revealed to me, his One true Prophet on Earth." Strange that he only reveals these things (like Split/Merge dadology) to you dad... isn't it?

I have enough backbone and intelligence to ask for real solid evidence. They have failed. It is certain that they are dark deceivers now.

If you want to see what a "dark deceiver" looks like, just look in the mirror. You are the one selling nonsense as Christianity.

Seems you are obsessed with a lighthearted little comment tag. Strange. Maybe because it is absolutely true, that even a little word can so disturb you.

Disturbed? LOL. Rather it is a source of constant amusement for me! But, perhaps there is some small hope for you if you at least consider it "light hearted."

 

[Tuddrussell]

the 4400 sucked, even though I watched every episode. Heroes was better, even though I only saw the first few minutes of one episode once.

 

[dad]

Strange that he only reveals these things (like Split/Merge dadology) to you dad... isn't it?

Science is a fairly modern thing. It is in these times that men really start to look for treasures new and old in the book of the King. Sure enough, it was there all along. Elementary.

If you want to see what a "dark deceiver" looks like, just look in the mirror. You are the one selling nonsense as Christianity.

Easy to expose as false. You cannot make a bible case against the different future or far past. I make one for them. Step in the ring, rather than hiding in the bleachers heckling, and see how you do

Disturbed? LOL.

OK, try to keep it together then, and stop obsessing over single words in a poster's descriptive area. Oh, and while you are are at it, try to work on calling posters God or prophets, and such insanity. It would make for a more intellectual discussion. Theres more, but hey...baby steps.

 

[dad]

Why then? I would have thought a different state would be needed to get the population of the earth up to some kind of level where people could start repopulating the earth, surly it would need people to start changing their colour and their features in order to spread across the world? with todays state people will not do that over night it would take generations and I haven't even mentioned the animals that would need to change and spread.

Where are you getting your information from? is it written anywhere?

The bible.

There we have the timeframe that any changes would have to take place in. We also have details of major planetary events that require something other than present laws. The water in the flood falling down from the sky, even, I was told, would generate heat by the friction, so that supposedly life would get steamed. But certainly a rapid continental movement, spirits living on earth, trees growing in weeks, long lifespans, etc just can't happen in the present state.