The more I am digging into this the more interesting it is getting. First, there aren't very many good identifiers. Instead there are associations. An "identifier" would be a specific spot we could point to today and have sources that could show with certainty that's definitely the spot. "Associations" are references that show two or more things had the same name or were in proximity to eachother, perhaps with a distance given in cubits or such, but for which there is no identifier that can definitively connect it with a location on today's map.
I'm suprised that this is so difficult. Even if the Romans leveled Israel I thought Jerusalem particularly had been thoroughly escavated and its history analyzed inch by inch for centuries. But one of the first helpful sites I found was Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, who writing about a century and a half ago seemed to have the exact same problem as me. There are maps, but when you look into the sources from which those maps are given all sorts of presumptions are made without any definite identifiers. So it appears that archeologists really have their work cut out for them.
Here is a link to Schwarz.
A Descriptive Geography and Brief History of Palestine, by Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850.
Hi James,
I don't know if this helps at all but in the Book of Isaiah there is an interesting passage in chapter 5. You may want to read it and see if you get any insight.
Here is something on Hananeels Tower called the Hippicus tower
It gives a location so perhaps the others can be determined from that.
Yes, that is one of the associations Rabbi Schwarz mentioned. And it demonstrates the difficulty I'm having. The site says that it can definitely be determined that Hiccipus is the same as Hannanel but doesn't say anything about why or site any sources. Probably they are going by Rabbi Schwarz? Schwarz points to Josephus and has some rabbinic sources from the Talmud. He also was a cartographer but I haven't found any maps that provide sufficient detail of the gates and landmarks mentioned by Zechariah.
I would also suggest reading the book of Nehemiah where they are come back from exile and rebuilding the walls and gates. Much info there.
Yes, indeed. But again Nehemiah provides associations without identifiers. Schwarz says he counts counterclockwise. Maybe that's so. I'm looking into it.
I'm not sure how helpful this is but here are some of Wesleys notes on this passage:
From the Encyclopedia Britannica
found here it gives a bit on the gates, scroll slowly down to the end of the page )640) on the right and look at the notes.
It says that the Benjamin Gate was at the East end of the North wall , which doesn't really contradict Wesley, but makes it more precise.
Hope that helps a bit! Let us know what you figure out!
Yes, it is said that the Benjamin Gate was along the North Wall on the East boundary on a number of web sites and they may be taking that on Wesley's authority. But where did Wesley get his authority? I can believe them, since that is the best I can do if I can't find anything else.
From there I go to eschatology. Ezekiel says the Benjamin Gate was not on the North Wall, but on the East Wall. He looks forward to a newly built Jerusalem. John also describes yet a different configuration. I think John is providing the heavenly description while Ezekiel is giving the earthly city.
Zechariah is describing a very great earthquake. The city of Jerusalem rises at that time while the surrounding areas are flattened into a plain. At that time Messiah returns setting foot on the Mt. of Olives. He can explain to us where the Kings Wine Presses were . I haven't found anything other than more speculation on that (though I can certainly see the allegory). There will also be laborers at that time. Perhaps they will assist in the building of the city and temple. But it has occurred to me it is possible that no such work will be required beyond cultivation at that time. Ezekiel provides the description at length.
The fact that reliable identifiers are lacking seems moot when considering that the whole landscape will be transformed by a massive earthquake and Ezekiel provides the next result. It seems that new wine bursts out of the old wine skins. But I'm still surprised that it has been difficult to find a series of maps showing ...
- Israel territory/tribes at time of David
- Jerusalem perimeter, wall and gate locations time of David
- Temple location time of David
- Gates of temple location time of David
- All of the above Nehemiah period
- All of the above Hasmonian period
- Other landmarks mentioned by prophets
If I had that I would be able to have sufficient references to overlay a projection of the future layout based on what the prophets indicate. I can jump ahead without it. Zechariah says Jerusalem is not moved from its place as it rises up. Then Ezekiel provides the dimensions. But in saying that I find a clue. That is there must be a constant that serves as a point of reference.
So to my OP I would like to like to also ask what any of you forum participants think would be a good point of reference. Maybe it is the Benjamin Gate or, or perhaps the Tower of Hannanel, as you suggested. If I had just two of the gates I could get the rest through Ezekiel?