Best creationist theories ever!

[Mistermystery]

What is in your opinion the best creationist theories/ideas/whatever you may call them? Ranging from "God created the world in 6 days" to "Danging Greenland theory" to "water-vapor-canopies", basically any are alowed. We (I) want to hear from you (you) what you think is the best and why.

 

[MartinM]

I forget the fellow's name, but someone who used to post here proposed a metallic hydrogen canopy. That was always good for a laugh. Ikester, or something like that, maybe.

 

[Illuminatus]

dad's theory about how the earth's core is a giant diamond surrounded by liquid gold never fails to crack me up.

 

[Tenka]

I do not speak of those who are now known as the ignored.

Does someone know where the dancing greenland theory can be found or can the sum it up?
If I go looking for it I'll waste hours of my time that I really need to be writing an essay with, I don't mind so much if others waste their time.

 

[Lilandra]

don't they know that ice is white?

Seriously, I would have to vote for the "Merge then Split" Theory of EDITed name out. All hail the King Ad Hoc

What is in your opinion the best creationist theories/ideas/whatever you may call them? Ranging from "God created the world in 6 days" to "Danging Greenland theory" to "water-vapor-canopies", basically any are alowed. We (I) want to hear from you (you) what you think is the best and why.

 

[nvxplorer]

Evolution is racist, therefore it is false.

 

[Guywiththehead]

There was someone on WinAce's site who said that God created the dinosaurs, killed them off, and slammed them into the opposite side of the Earth, causing it to orbit the Sun.

I wish I had the quote, it was hilarious.

 

[Mistermystery]

I do not speak of those who are now known as the ignored.

Does someone know where the dancing greenland theory can be found or can the sum it up?
If I go looking for it I'll waste hours of my time that I really need to be writing an essay with, I don't mind so much if others waste their time.

Google never let's one down, scroll up a page or 2:

http://www.christianforums.com/t103172&page=8

 

[Mistermystery]

don't they know that ice is white?

Seriously, I would have to vote for the "Merge then Split" Theory of EDITed name out. All hail the King Ad Hoc

I have never heard that one. explain.

 

[Grengor]

Neo-darwinistic fascist racial theories is bad and my wife is African American so since she rejects it it means shes not from monkeys(?)...so Evolution is false

 

[Lilandra]

in this thread:
http://www.christianforums.com/t2325023-dad-split-universe-evidenced.html

basically any argument for an ancient Earth is discounted by The Fall. Supposedly before the Fall the light of the stars was a spiritual light thus it didn't conform to the properties light does now. That is why Adam and Eve he says could see the stars in a 6,000 year old Earth.

When Eve bit the apple a split occured to where everything became physical rather than spiritual. Some sort of merge between spiritual and physical is coming.

Basically, any argument he can't refute he takes poetic liscense with Genesis and then claims that no one can refute him.

I have never heard that one. explain.

 

[Micaiah]

For whacky theories you can't beat the one about people evolving from a primordial soup of chemicals, or the universe spontaneously evolving from a big bang.

 

[Yusuf Evans]

I'm going with the Big Bang Theory. It may fall in line with scientific studies, but I do believe that's how the universe was began, according to the will of the Lord.

 

[Dannager]

or the universe spontaneously evolving from a big bang.

The words "spontaneously" and "evolving" pretty much never belong next to each other.

 

[dlamberth]

I vote for split/merge theology of which there is never, ever any evidence presented.



.

 

[Micaiah]

The words "spontaneously" and "evolving" pretty much never belong next to each other.

There will always be a fair degree of spontaneity in a 'theory' that suggests the world we see today evolved from nothing,

 

[Electric Sceptic]

I'd have to put my vote into the argument that water on Mars proves the flood - see, that's where god sent all the water after the flood (and why we can't find the required amount of water to flood the Earth on the Earth any more).

 

[Caphi]

There will always be a fair degree of spontaneity in a 'theory' that suggests the world we see today evolved from nothing,

I suppose you have an alternative more palatable to your tastes?

 

[Guywiththehead]

For whacky theories you can't beat the one about people evolving from a primordial soup of chemicals, or the universe spontaneously evolving from a big bang.

That's so much whackier than the whole silly Flood myth, the magically changing rates of decay, the magically changing speed of light, all animals being vegetarians before the Fall, the ridiculous speeds of evolution after the Flood in order for all the "kinds" to produce the amount of species in existance in a few thousand years, a God who sacrifices Himself to Himself to prevent him from having to punish us for something that Adam and Eve did when they didn't have the mental ability to not do, which he could've prevented if He wanted to. . .

 

[neverforsaken]

i do not like bananas therefore i could not have evolved from a monkey.