- May 29, 2012
- 41,108
- 24,136
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So I suppose the IRS targetting Conservatives as well as Christians and Jews didn't happen, oh that's right it did happen...
So much for it being a conspiracy theory huh...
1. When did that happen?
2. When did Bachman draw attention to it?
I don't claim to speak for Bennet but he's right that Bachman has said some nutty things before. See: HPV vaccines cause otherwise healthy women to suffer from mental retardation, Mexican Drug Cartels teaming up with Iranian paramilitary, Swine Flu outbreaks having a causal relationship with Democratic administrations, etc.
Specifically Christian and Jewish organizations.The targetting went on from at least 2010 and is still going on.
Except that has no bearing on Bachman being a nutter.I didn't say she did, I'm saying that calling people a bunch of nuts for not trusting the government is laughable, considering the IRS scandal, the Benghazi Scandal, and the DoJ targeting AP and Fox News.
Are you for real? No one denies that vaccinations cant have health problems associated with them. Bachmans contention was that the vaccine caused mental retardation. Note that none of those side effects listed in the CBS article are mental retardation.Oh really? I actually did some checking and it's funny, while you thought what Bachman was nutty, you need to learn that just cause something sounds nutty, doesn't mean it isn't true.
Health risks from HPV vaccine:
Side effects for the HPV vaccines include pain and redness or swelling at the injection site. In addition, other mild reactions can include dizziness, nausea and headache, the CDC reported. Fainting is also a side effect, but it is important to note that it can occur because of any vaccine or injection. There was also an increase of blood clots of the lungs reported compared to young women around the same age who had received other vaccines, but 90 percent had a known risk factor for blood clots, including taking oral contraceptives, otherwise known as birth control pills.
In total, 23 million doses were administered as of June 2006. Out of 12,424 cases of adverse events by that date, only 6 percent were serious and 32 deaths were reported. However, none of the deaths had a discernible pattern that would suggest that the vaccine was the cause of death.
Side effect fears stop parents from getting HPV vaccine for daughters - CBS News
New Biohazard Found in HPV Vaccine Gardasil
She most certainly was.So Bachmann wasn't exactly off her rocker on the first example you gave...
Except probably not.Mexican Drug Cartel working with Iran:
The Iranian plot the US government says aimed to murder Saudi Arabia's ambassador to Washington allegedly fell down because a member of the Mexican Zeta drug cartel hired to carry out the job for $1.5m was actually a US informant.
The informant told the Drugs Enforcement Agency (DEA) in May that he had been contacted by alleged Iranian agent Manssor Arbabsiar. They held several meetings in Mexico which were taped. Methods discussed reportedly included a targeted assassination and a bomb.
Iran's alleged Mexican hitman was US drugs informant | World news | The Guardian
The report found that the “Southwest border has now become the greatest threat of terrorist infiltration into the United States.” It specifically cited a “growing influence” from Iranian and Hezbollah terror forces in Latin America.
The Mexican government disagreed with that assessment.
“The Government of Mexico, as it has done in the past, reiterates that no such relationship or presence exists,” Ricardo Alday, a spokesman for Mexico’s ambassador to the United States, wrote in a letter to TheDC.
Alday pointed to the U.S. State Department’s Country Reports on Terrorism to support Mexico’s argument. “n each and every one of its Country Reports on Terrorism, the US Department of State has unmistakably established that there is no such relationship.”
Alday quoted the latest such State Department report, issued on July 31 of this year.
“No known international terrorist organization had an operational presence in Mexico and no terrorist group targeted U.S. citizens in or from Mexican territory,” the State Department report reads. “There was no evidence of ties between Mexican criminal organizations and terrorist groups, nor that the criminal organizations had political or territorial control, aside from seeking to protect and expand the impunity with which they conduct their criminal activity.”
"I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence."The third thing you brought up was probably something she meant figuratively and I would need the context of the statements you are referring to in order to do a detailed search on it.
Specifically Christian and Jewish organizations.
Except that has no bearing on Bachman being a nutter.
Are you for real? No one denies that vaccinations cant have health problems associated with them. Bachmans contention was that the vaccine caused mental retardation. Note that none of those side effects listed in the CBS article are mental retardation.
She most certainly was.
"I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence."
Hmm yes, she thinks its JUST a coincidence.
Oh and she was also wrong. Ford was the last President in charge during a swine flu epidemic prior to the one under Obama.
In case you havent noticed Im waiting for a citation.As to how far back when they started doing this, not sure, but we do know that they were targetted in 2011 up to today.
Wait what?Actually it does...
It can cause an increase in blood clots, in case you were unaware, blood clots in the brain are what causes strokes... Strokes cause brain damage which can cause a loss in a person's ability to function permanently...
I am not the one spinning this particular gem.So no matter how you try to spin it, what Bachman said was accurate...
So are you suggesting that a stroke is the same thing as mental retardation?So are you suggesting strokes can't cause brain damage?
Perhaps not, but when they quote OUR OWN State Department, which has no such reason to lie, I tend to listen.Do you honestly think that Mexico would want to admit that their cartels (which many goverment officials in Mexico are on the dole of said cartels) that those cartels now are associating themselves with Iran?
Bachmann is such an intellectual lightweight that it almost isnt worth the effort to talk about her time on the House Intelligence committee.Seriously considering the committees in the House that Bachman was a member of when she made those statements, if I had to pick between which of you actually knew what they were talking about, I'd have to pick Bachman over you.
I mean seriously, she got intelligence briefings and you did not, so chances are she actually knows what she's talking about, and you don't.
Except 1. it was a fact that she made up and 2. she was obviously trying to draw a causal relationship between swine flu and Democratic presidents. Its the basic Glenn Beck Just Asking Questions tactic.Okay? So she's taking a swipe at Obama in a way comparing him to Jimmy Carter.
Do you even know yourself what youre talking about anymore?Words can have more than one meaning and sometimes things can be a play on words... Does the term porkulace (also been called spendulous)mean anything to you?
She's a tax attorney not an expert on Intelligence.She's a tax attorney not a historian...
Did Sen. Dole take the test himself? I ask becuase I'm wondering what is the ultimate source of that plot graph.
And if he is, and he represents the spirit of early-to-mid-century conservatism, and in turn represents the spirit of conservatism before that, then appealing to your scale (which is a great one) means you're appealing to something that lacks validity: it doesn't really measure old-school conservatism defined according to the Burkean temperament of reluctance but willingness to change as opposed to unreluctant rigidity to change because of a willingness to return to much older principles from another time.
So Dole is a moderate populist according to your scale; this means that all old-school conservates are moderate populists to some significant degree, which is why the argument breaks down by using the scale.
I do find that interestint that our liberal friends find it within their purview to tell us what we as conservatives should believe. I suspect it's because to them, winning and holding power is the preeminent goal and if principles have to be abandoned to do so, then so be it. Thus they believe conservatives should do the same, abandon our principles in order to winSo basically, you're trying to define conservative for us. Nice.
Also: unreluctant - Definition of unreluctant - Online Dictionary from Datasegment.com
So, when liberals refuse to drop their principles for "unity" they're showing backone, right? When conservatives refuse, it's because we're no longer true conservatives?
I do find that interestint that our liberal friends find it within their purview to tell us what we as conservatives should believe. I suspect it's because to them, winning and holding power is the preeminent goal and if principles have to be abandoned to do so, then so be it. Thus they believe conservatives should do the same, abandon our principles in order to win
It was organizations with political-sounding names that applied for 501(c)(4) exemptions that were targeted not generic conservatives or Christians. It was meant as triage for the overwhelming flood of such applications and outside inquiries about those applications.The targetting went on from at least 2010 and is still going on.
Which ones do you think?
It was organizations with political-sounding names that applied for 501(c)(4) exemptions that were targeted not generic conservatives or Christians. It was meant as triage for the overwhelming flood of such applications and outside inquiries about those applications.
I do find that interestint that our liberal friends find it within their purview to tell us what we as conservatives should believe. I suspect it's because to them, winning and holding power is the preeminent goal and if principles have to be abandoned to do so, then so be it. Thus they believe conservatives should do the same, abandon our principles in order to win