"Babies disprove Darwin"

[Wiccan_Child]

Oh Lawd...

"While Darwin was formulating his Theory of Evolution, he purposely overlooked the babies of mammals and birds because these babies are unfit to survive and Darwin's theory could not possibly explain this. So Darwin ignored babies - he never wrote about them. But it was absurd and wrong to ignore a crucial portion of the life of most species of mammals and birds just because it does not fit with the theory.


The fact that most birds and mammals have helpless and fragile babies totally contradicts Darwinism. If Darwinian evolution actually worked, the result would have been that all higher life forms would have babies that were "fit" and self-reliant rather than fragile and helpless. The worldwide presence of infantile fragility is such a devastating blow to the Theory of Evolution that it actually renders Darwinism totally invalid because it contradicts the very essence of the theory."


http://darwinconspiracy.com/index.php

 

[Hespera]

that is funny

 

[Split Rock]

Oh Lawd...

"While Darwin was formulating his Theory of Evolution, he purposely overlooked the babies of mammals and birds because these babies are unfit to survive and Darwin's theory could not possibly explain this. So Darwin ignored babies - he never wrote about them. But it was absurd and wrong to ignore a crucial portion of the life of most species of mammals and birds just because it does not fit with the theory.


The fact that most birds and mammals have helpless and fragile babies totally contradicts Darwinism. If Darwinian evolution actually worked, the result would have been that all higher life forms would have babies that were "fit" and self-reliant rather than fragile and helpless. The worldwide presence of infantile fragility is such a devastating blow to the Theory of Evolution that it actually renders Darwinism totally invalid because it contradicts the very essence of the theory."


http://darwinconspiracy.com/index.php

LOL! Good stuff!

Of course, one question that came to me after reading this nonsense, is this: If these babies are all unfit to survive, then How Come They Do Survive?? hmmmmmmmmmmm....

 

[Athrond]

Being stupid for jesus...

 

[keith99]

Actually babies are a 'transitional form' that the creationists manage to overlook. They excercise primitive mind cntrol, forcing more physically developed adults to take care of them.

In a few million years those life forms with 'helpless' babies will have perfected this and rule the universe, while those with less helpless babes will be reduced to slavery!

For those who don't get it my post is a farce, but funnier and not as stupid as the creationist idea that this thread is based on.

 

[sbvera13]

unfit to survive[/I], then How Come They Do Survive?? hmmmmmmmmmmm....

Aha!

 

[Wiccan_Child]

Actually babies are a 'transitional form' that the creationists manage to overlook. They excercise primitive mind cntrol, forcing more physically developed adults to take care of them.

In a few million years those life forms with 'helpless' babies will have perfected this and rule the universe, while those with less helpless babes will be reduced to slavery!

 

[Cabal]

These transitional forms then evolve into:

 

[shernren]

But babies are cute.

And Darwin ignored them.

He can't possibly be right about anything whatsoever.

 

[birdan]

Obviously Clausius overlooked babies also, when he formulated his laws of thermodynamics. A fertilized egg developing into a baby is an obvious violation of the 2LOT. ( for Poe's sake).

 

[Hespera]

Obviously Clausius overlooked babies also, when he formulated his laws of thermodynamics. A fertilized egg developing into a baby is an obvious violation of the 2LOT. ( for Poe's sake).

If anyone wondered whether being a creationist requires a low IQ then just look at how hard it is for them to grasp ANYTHING about 2LOT. I mean good grief. Observe how energy acts to organize matter thru which it flows.
Observe it in a million demonstrations every doggone day of your life,but, still pretend its not there. THAT is dumb, and determined to stay so.

 

[BananaSlug]

It seems that they really will spout anything to keep the followers (and money) rolling in!

 

[Ebguy]

Seriously it HAS to be a parody or something. No one could be that stupid. I doubt you could even read the Origin of Species if you WERE that stupid. It has to be a troll or someone doing it for laughs.

 

[MoonLancer]

Seriously it HAS to be a parody or something. No one could be that stupid. I doubt you could even read the Origin of Species if you WERE that stupid. It has to be a troll or someone doing it for laughs.

that's what i thought when i first came to this forum. you will begin to realize that reality has some far reaching overlap and that the real thing can be mistaken as a parody and viceversa. in other words, poe's law.

 

[Hespera]

that's what i thought when i first came to this forum. you will begin to realize that reality has some far reaching overlap and that the real thing can be mistaken as a parody and viceversa. in other words, poe's law.

well see i did not actually know it was possible to parody creationism

 

[MoonLancer]

its pretty hard sometimes.

 

[Wiccan_Child]

Seriously it HAS to be a parody or something. No one could be that stupid. I doubt you could even read the Origin of Species if you WERE that stupid. It has to be a troll or someone doing it for laughs.

You'd be surprised how stupid some people can be. Especially Creationists .

well see i did not actually know it was possible to parody creationism

Qv., please.