Colter
Member
How familiar are you with the study of epistemology? Any decent epistemological system has to have some justifying principle, something to make statements true beyond just stating the statements out loud. On the surface, claims of subjective, personal experience are no better than claims I've made up because they have the same amount of impersonal justification.
The only difference is in action: the person claiming the subjective experience will probably act as if the experience was true while the person who made one up will not act upon it.
Action, however, is not a justification of the truth value of the claim itself, but the result of belief, regardless of the truth content.
The reasons we do not accept your personal experience as valid evidence is:
a) It is no different from someone who we know is insane, yet acts upon their beliefs and assumptions
b) We can study the psychological/neurological/social mechanics behind religious experience and find out that what people consider "spiritual" experience is very much more physical than they believe.
Do you think religious people are insane?
Upvote
0