Say, have you ever considered that you might get better reactions from people if you didn't accuse them of being stupid, hateful and lying in every second sentence?
Have you ever considered that it might be better to explain yourself if you feel you are misunderstood rather than assert that people are "playing dumb"?
It seems to be very important for you that the fundamental concept etc etc... you repeated it often enough.
There have been several attempts here by several posters who did make clear that they would debate that as a concept... attempts which you seem to have misunderstood - grossly.
And now I try again: I accept your definition of your concept.
Now what is your point? And I would like to have an answer... not a puzzle, a riddle or a counterquestion.
Tell me then what you suspect to be the point, since you cannot get my point from the message I told you to get it from.
Do some some serious suspecting.
Don't see offense again, get some good text on reading comprehension.
Here, I will help you, or that is also offensive to you?
Since you are asking me what is my point, use the search function to look for all instances of the word point, in particular as used by Pachomius, and then try to make out what is the point of Pachomius by reading all the words before and after the word point, okay?
All the words before and after point until the light dawns on you what is the point of Pachomius.
And tell me whether what you get to be my point is correct or not.
If I say no, then bring forth all the words before and after the word point as are needed by a person with reading comprehension, to convince Pachomius that it should be his point because any guy with reading comprehension will get that to be his point from the words before and after his use of the word point.
Pachomius
Upvote
0