Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, it is. That's why the Bible tells Christians not to be unequally yoked with non-Christians.
If somebody claiming to be a Christian has the same morals and values as an atheist, then they need to take a good hard look at their claim to Christianity.
As for raising children, how can an atheist raise a child in the fear and admonition of the Lord, when they don't believe in God in the first place?
I wasn't aware that the Lock Ness Monster gave us commands to follow in how we live our lives and how we live out our faith.
How is that in any way a prequesite? Whatever happened to Love?
Hi Mike,Yes, it is. That's why the Bible tells Christians not to be unequally yoked with non-Christians.
If somebody claiming to be a Christian has the same morals and values as an atheist, then they need to take a good hard look at their claim to Christianity.
As for raising children, how can an atheist raise a child in the fear and admonition of the Lord, when they don't believe in God in the first place?
I wasn't aware that the Lock Ness Monster gave us commands to follow in how we live our lives and how we live out our faith.
So Christian/atheist couples cannot be successfully married? There are more than enough examples to show that that is not the case.
Ah, the old "not a real Christian" argument.
An atheist can be as moral as a Christian
Leave it up to the Christian parent to teach the Christian beliefs, and let the atheist parents teach the atheist beliefs.
Directions and foundations for living a good and proper life can be found in myriad places besides the Bible.
So, in answer to your question, "Whatever happened to love," I answer emphatically, "love without God isn't love at all."
Funny, here I assumed we had been married (in a Church no less) over 12 yrs ago.True love is based on substance. Initial attraction is a whole other matter. Marriage must be based on substance. Therefore, if a Christian meets someone who has no regard for God, they would see that their relationship cannot feasibly develop into anything that would lead to marriage. You see WOTN, despite how Hollyweird likes to portray "love," it doesn't happen in a split second. Godly love is, as I said, based on substance.
So, in answer to your question, "Whatever happened to love," I answer emphatically, "love without God isn't love at all."
God bless
We hold the same values and morals in that we dont believe in stealing, lying, keeping one's promise to another, my husband cant stand swearing or cursing, he does slip, however Im the one who has the mouth and yet Im the Christian. Go figure
When I start judging others over something he is the one to remind me that Jesus hung out with all sorts of people and I dont have the right to judge.
He may not believe it, but he does believe in the historical Jesus and I guess seeing that, its enough for me.
Jesus had God within (a part of God) so maybe in my silly thinking I sorta think that we all therefore follow God whether we believe we do or not.
As for Children believing...
The nice thing at least about my husband is that he is open minded enough to have them go to Church as he wants them to devolop their own beliefs.
If they believe in God than to him that is wonderful, if not then that is great also, but it will be because of education both ways....
I guess it depends on what your standard for success is.
No, the old "not everybody who claims to be a Christian is a Christian" Biblical teaching.
Who's morals?
I see. So then, there's a descrepancy between the two, after all.
But being that we're talking about Christians, we're talking about the directions and foundations taught in the Bible.
That's extremely insulting to every non-Christian couple in love. It's an absurd claim laced with conceit and unsupported by real world facts.
As an atheist, he doesn't honor the Sabbath or keep it holy. He can't say that he has no gods before the Lord.
Funny, here I assumed we had been married (in a Church no less) over 12 yrs ago.
But as a relationship with an AThiest would never develop into anything that would lead to marriage it just cant be so....
Actually, every single atheist is supremely successful at that second part. I hold no god above or before your God. I rank no god higher than your God.
Precisely. And if a Christian and an atheist have the same standards for a successful marriage, then they can achieve it. If they have differing standards, I wouldn't expect them to want to get married in the first place.
So, for example, a Christian follows all of the necessary dictates of Christianity, but believes in evolution... is this person a true Christian?
Where is the line? Who draws it? Who defines a true Christian?
Those who are more "devout" than you might consider you to be a false Christian.
The couple's.
I never said their weren't differences. I said the differences do not result in inequality. 2+2 is different than 2x2 is different than 2^2, but they are all equal to 4.
And nothing is preventing those directions and foundations from being practiced or imparted to children.
And nothing is preventing a non-believer from respecting and being open to the beliefs of a spouse.
And how does an atheist do this?
I would think that an atheist's conscience should prevent him from teaching something he believes to be a lie.
He doesn't. He let's his spouse do it.
Teaching it himself, yes.
Allowing it to be taught by his spouse out of respect for that person's beliefs and out of respect for his child's ability to make her own choice in beliefs is something that is easily done.
How does a Christian woman submit to a man who won't follow through on his responsibilities?
But if they have the same values, as I'm constantly being told that they do, why does he have a problem with teaching it?
So then, the father in this case knowingly allows his child to be taught that something is true, that he believes to be a lie?
Well, that there may be our problem; I don't feel that a woman needs to submit to a man.
Because he doesn't believe it.
Parents lie to their children all the time, Christian, atheist, or otherwise.
You child will learn about evolution (unless you are so irresponsible as to prevent them from becoming properly educated)
If she's a Christian woman and she wants to be obedient to God, then she does need to submit to her husband, just as her husband needs to submit to her.
Then they don't have the same values.
I find that extremely unlikely.I don't. To my knowledge, nobody I know does.
Well, if they learn that definition, which is in no way representative of how evolution happens, you should keep them from learning such falsehoods. You'd have done well to educate yourself as well; you would have learned that nobody within the scientific community proposes that your description of evolution is accurate. Is that what you tell your children evolution is? If so, then you are indeed lying to them. However, if you are stopping them from learning the actual scientific explanation of evolutionary biology, then you are in fact hindering their education and propogating ignorance. Would you be proud (in a non-sinful way) if your child became a doctor, helping the sick and injured? That is impossible for them unless they gain a proper education in biology, of which evolution is a key concept. And learning evolution is in no way incompatible with the Christian faith.Yes, how dare we be so irresponsible as to keep our children from learning that one day a fish woke up and he was a monkey and then the monkey woke up and was a man.