Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What are you talking about?But as you ask, it doesn't work because no dinosaur fossils are found above the detritus left by the meteor, if AV's nonsense is factual we would.
Serious doubt has been cast upon the crater. It's also not just within the YEC world view.Yes.
But even if it weren’t, it’s far from the only crater on earth and not the biggest, so that doesn’t much help you.
And let me guess.
Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego died in the fire, I take it?
Incidentally Nebuchadnezzar said:
Daniel 3:25 He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.
Do you think Jesus was on the Ark with Noah?
Serious doubt has been cast upon the crater.
It's also not just within the YEC world view.
As to it not being the only crater...the articles make me wonder about the other craters.
The whole point of the argument is, is that it is a model that may or may not provide a method for the fountains of the deep erupting.
the dead sea scroll show it was writted prior to the Maccabean era.The book of Daniel is a work of fiction dating from the time of the Maccabean rebellion (about 164 BCE). It was written almost 400 years after the death of Nebuchadnezzar.
How did the Dead Sea Scrolls show that? Genuinely curious.the dead sea scroll show it was writted prior to the Maccabean era.
According to Book of Daniel - Wikipedia , 'All eight manuscripts [of the Book of Daniel] were copied between 125 BC (4QDanc) and about 50 AD (4QDanb), showing that Daniel was being read at Qumran only about 40 years after its composition.' These dates of copying do not show that the book 'was written prior to the Maccabean era'.the dead sea scroll show it was written prior to the Maccabean era.
FYI, Jesus believed in the book of Daniel ...According to Book of Daniel - Wikipedia , 'All eight manuscripts [of the Book of Daniel] were copied between 125 BC (4QDanc) and about 50 AD (4QDanb), showing that Daniel was being read at Qumran only about 40 years after its composition.' These dates of copying do not show that the book 'was written prior to the Maccabean era'.
What are you talking about?
What meteor?
The scrolls were copies indicating daniel was written before the Maccabean.According to Book of Daniel - Wikipedia , 'All eight manuscripts [of the Book of Daniel] were copied between 125 BC (4QDanc) and about 50 AD (4QDanb), showing that Daniel was being read at Qumran only about 40 years after its composition.' These dates of copying do not show that the book 'was written prior to the Maccabean era'.
But that's not what the Bible teaches. The language of the account clearly shows it was a world wide flood.
because they formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through water.
Eight persons survived. Why? the flood was world wide.
That's what they told their subordinates at Enron.But they do change the way the narrative is interpreted.
Genesis 7:19 - 20 said:And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
Affirmative. No, they didn't. If they did, why are the facts so different?
I'd rather think of the entire U.S. west coast as being beckoned out of the ocean.
Genesis 1:9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
Which would be the whole earth, would it not?Eight persons survived the flood in the area it affected.
Except the olive tree where the dove got the branch from. That wasn’t covered ... NVM.... magic.Which would be the whole earth, would it not?
Genesis 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Would those "high hills that were under the whole heaven" also include the San Juan hills of Cuba?
Which would be the whole earth, would it not?
Genesis 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Would those "high hills that were under the whole heaven" also include the San Juan hills of Cuba?
Leaf ... olive leaf.Except the olive tree where the dove got the branch from.
Nope, I sure don't.So do you think that every mountain on earth is no more than 22.5 feet higher than the highest hill?
Cool school.Then neither will I over your arguments.
The original Hebrew uses the word eretz, which means land, and can refer to the local land. Besides, there are many parts of scripture that are not meant to be taken literally - surely you must agree that allegories, metaphors, and parables exist in the Bible.
Eight persons survived the flood in the area it affected.
Okay, you think the numbers listed in Genesis are critically important? Answer me this then:
A cubit is the length of the forearm from the elbow to the longest finger (around 1.5 feet).
According to these verses, after covering "the high hills", the waters only had to rise 15 cubits (22.5 feet) further to cover the mountains.
Presuming a global flood, Mount Everest (29,029 feet) would have been covered. But "The Mountains of Ararat" are also mentioned in the Genesis narrative. Obviously, as these are considered mountains, they were higher than "the high hills". The tallest mountain in the Ararat region is the Greater Ararat, which is 16,854 feet tall. 29,029 - 16,854 = 12,175, which is a bit more than 22.5.
True. They would have been post Babel stories.Folk memory. Stories change over time with multiple retellings.
Which would be the whole earth, would it not?
Genesis 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Would those "high hills that were under the whole heaven" also include the San Juan hills of Cuba?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?