The evidence you ask for is the genetic and molecular evidence of common descent, in the fossil record, and morphology. Particularly when this is combined with geology. (E.g. species that evolved during different geological epochs when the land masses were arranged differently.) There's plenty of such evidence, but you just ignore it and claim it isn't there.
Note that genetic and molecular evidence in particular is produced in the laboratory, with laboratory testing including computer analysis.
There is none so blind as they who refuse to see.
You say "There's plenty of such evidence, but you just ignore it and claim it isn't there."
That is a misrepresentation (I hope not intentional). If you were to go back and re-read post #134 very carefully you would see I neither ignore what we have seen NOR do I "claim it is not there". I simply see it as being something different based on actuality and sound reasoning (though our conclusions would disagree). So go back and re-read this post and maybe you and I (and others) can discuss the issues you have one at a time.
Upvote
0